Social biases and solutions for procedural objectivity

Hypatia

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 352-373

  Lee, Carole J ^a   Schunn, Christian D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052004747     PISSN: 08875367     EISSN: 15272001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01178.x     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Anderson, Elizabeth., 2004. Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce. Hypatia 19 (1): 1-24.
2. Bertrand, Marianne, and, Sendhil Mullainathan,. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? American Economic Review 94 (4): 991-1013.
3. Biernat, Monica, and, Diane Kobrynowicz,. 1997. Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (3): 544-57.
4. Biernat, Monica, and, Jennifer E. Ma,. 2005. Stereotypes and the confirmability of trait concepts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (4): 483-95.
5. Boltanski, Luc, and, Laurent Thévenot,. 2006. On justification: Economies of worth. Trans. Catherine Porter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6. Cambrosio, Alberto, Peter Keating, Thomas Schlich, and, George Weisz,. 2006. Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine. Social Science & Medicine 63: 189-99.
7. Chaiken, Shelly, and, Yaacov Trope,. 1999. Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.
8. Cicchetti, Domenic V., 1991. The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 119-86.
9. Cole, Stephen., 1983. The hierarchy of science? American Journal of Sociology 89: 111-39.
10. Cole, Stephen,. 1992. Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
11. Colyvan, Mark., n.d. The best philosophy journals. http://homepage.mac. com/mcolyvan/journals.html (accessed March 27, 2009).
12. Fiske, Susan T., and, Shelley E. Taylor,. 1991. Social cognition. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
13. Foschi, Martha., 2000. Double standards of competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 21-42.
14. Fricker, Miranda., 2007. Epistemic injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Glenn, Norvall D., 1982. The journal article review process as a game of chance. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 5: 211-12.
16. Gross, Neil., 2002. Becoming a pragmatist philosopher: Status, self-concept, and intellectual choice. American Sociological Review 67: 52-76.
17. Gross, Neil,. 2003. Richard Rorty's pragmatism: A case study in the sociology of ideas. Theory and Society 32 (1): 93-148.
18. Hargens, Lowell L., 1988. Cognitive consensus and journal rejection rates. American Sociological Review 53: 139-51.
19. Hargens, Lowell L., and, Jerald R. Herting,. 2006. Analyzing the association between referees' recommendations and editors' decisions. Scientometrics 67 (1): 15-26.
20. Haslanger, Sally., 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210-23.
21. Huebner, Bryce., 2009. Troubles with stereotypes for Spinozan minds. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1): 63-92.
22. Lacey, Hugh., 1999. Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding. New York: Routledge.
23. Lachs, John., 2004. The future of philosophy. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (2): 5-14.
24. Lamont, Michale., 2009. How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
25. Lederman, Rena., 2006. The perils of working at home: IRB "mission creep" as context and content for an ethnography of disciplinary knowledges. American Ethnologist 33 (4): 482-91.
26. Lee, Carole J., and, Christian D. Schunn,. 2010. Philosophy journal practices and opportunities for bias. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 10 (1): 5-10.
27. Leiter, Brian., 2009. The highest quality "general" philosophy journals in English. http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2009/03/the-highest- quality-general-philosophy-journals-in-english.html (accessed March 27, 2010).
28. Lock, Stephen., 1985. A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine. London: Nuffield Provincials Hospital Trust.
29. Longino, Helen., 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Longino, Helen,. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31. Mallard, Grégoire, Michale Lamont, and, Joshua Guetzkow,. 2009. Fairness as appropriateness: Negotiating epistemological differences in peer review. Science, Technology & Human Values 34 (5): 573-606.
32. Marsh, Herbert W., and, Samuel Ball,. 1989. The peer review process used to evaluate manuscripts submitted to academic journals: Interjudgmental reliability. Journal of Experimental Education 57 (2): 151-69.
33. Merton, Robert K., 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science 159 (3810): 56-63.
34. Merton, Robert K,. 1996. The Matthew effect, II (1988). In On social structure and science, ed., Piotr Sztompka,. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Monin, Benoit, and, Dale T. Miller,. 2001. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (1): 33-43.
36. Moulton, Janice., 1983. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Discovering reality, ed., Sandra Harding, and, Merrill B. Hintikka,. Hingham: D. Reidel.
37. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson., 1990. Who knows: From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
38. Nisbett, Richard E., and, Timothy DeCamp Wilson,. 1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental models. Psychological Review 84 (3): 231-59.
39. Norton, Michael I., Joseph A. Vandello, and, John M. Darley,. 2004. Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (6): 817-31.
40. Peters, Douglas P., and, Stephen J. Ceci,. 1982. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5: 187-255.
41. Schunn, Christian D., Keven Crowley, and, Takeshi Okada,. 1998. The growth of multidisciplinarity in the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science 22 (1): 107-30.
42. Scott, William A., 1974. Interreferee agreement on some characteristics submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychologist 29 (9): 698-702.
43. Solomon, Miriam., 2006. Groupthink versus The wisdom of crowds: The social epistemology of deliberation and dissent. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1): 28-42.
44. Solomon, Stephanie R., 2008. Through a glass darkly: The hidden perspectives that challenge and redeem science's self-conception. PhD diss. Department of Philosophy, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
45. Starbuck, William H., 2005. How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science 16 (2): 180-200.
46. Steinpreis, Rhea E., Katie A. Anders, and, Dawn Ritzke,. 1999. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles 41 (7/8): 509-28.
47. Sternberg, Robert, and, Tamara Gordeeva,. 1996. The anatomy of impact: What makes an article influential? Psychological Science 7 (2): 69-75.
48. Tollefsen, Deborah Perron., 2006. Group deliberation, social cohesion, and scientific teamwork: Is there room for dissent? Episteme 3 (1): 37-51.
49. Trope, Yaacov, and, Erik P. Thompson,. 1997. Looking for truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (2): 229-41.
50. Uhlmann, Eric Luis, and, Geoffrey L. Cohen,. 2005. Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science 16 (6): 474-80.
51. Uhlmann, Eric Luis, and, Geoffrey L. Cohen,. 2007. "I think it, therefore it's true": Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104: 207-23.
52. Valian, Virginia., 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
53. Wylie, Alison., 2008. Legacies of collaboration: Transformative criticism in archaeology. Patty Jo Watson Distinguished Lecture. American Anthropological Association. San Francisco.
54. Zanna, Mark., 1992. My life as a dog (I mean editor). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18: 485-88.
55. Zuckerman, Harriet, and, Robert K. Merton,. 1971. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9 (1): 66-100.