Strong response of an invasive plant species (Centaurea solstitialis L.) to global environmental changes

Ecological Applications

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1887-1894

  Dukes, Jeffrey S ^a,b   Chiariello, Nona R ^c   Loarie, Scott R ^d   Field, Christopher B ^d  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Centaurea solstitialis (yellow starthistle); Climate change; Elevated CO 2; Grasslands; Invasive species; Nitrogen deposition; Rangelands; Weed

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; RAIN;

ACCIDENT; AMBIENT AIR; ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GRASSLAND; INVASIVE SPECIES; MESOCOSM; NITRATE; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RANGELAND; VASCULAR PLANT;

ARTICLE; CENTAUREA; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; FIRE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INTRODUCED SPECIES; POACEAE; TEMPERATURE; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; CARBON DIOXIDE; CENTAUREA; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; FIRES; INTRODUCED SPECIES; POACEAE; RAIN; TEMPERATURE;

CALIFORNIA; SAN FRANCISCO BAY; UNITED STATES;

CENTAUREA; CENTAUREA SOLSTITIALIS;

EID: 80051965493     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/11-0111.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amatangelo, K. L., J. S. Dukes, and C. B. Field. 2008. Annual grassland responses to litter manipulation. Journal of Vegetation Science 19:605-612.
2. 2] depends on differential responses of dominant invasive species and is mediated by soil water availability. New Phytologist 161:827-835. (Pubitemid 38193021)
3. Blumenthal, D., R. A. Chimner, J. M. Welker, and J. A. Morgan. 2008. Increased snow facilitates plant invasion in mixedgrass prairie. New Phytologist 179:440-448. (Pubitemid 351991421)
4. Blumenthal, D., C. E. Mitchell, P. Pysek, and V. Jarosik. 2009. Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:7899-7904.
5. Bradley, B. A., D. M. Blumenthal, D. S. Wilcove, and L. H. Ziska. 2010. Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:310-318.
6. Bradley, B. A., M. Oppenheimer, and D. S. Wilcove. 2009. Climate change and plant invasions: restoration opportunities ahead? Global Change Biology 15:1511-1521.
7. Brooks, M. L. 2003. Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:344-353. (Pubitemid 36524552)
8. 2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:18866-18870. (Pubitemid 350210788)
9. 2 concentration affect the success of invasive species? Pages 95-113 in H. A. Mooney and R. J. Hobbs, editors. Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.C.,USA.
10. Dukes, J. S. 2001. Biodiversity and invasibility in grassland microcosms. Oecologia 126:563-568. (Pubitemid 32442694)
11. 2 on an invasive species (Centaurea solstitialis) in monoculture and community settings. Plant Ecology 160:225-234. (Pubitemid 34791824)
12. Dukes, J. S. 2002b. Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecological Applications 12:602-617. (Pubitemid 36516679)
13. Dukes, J. S., N. R. Chiariello, E. E. Cleland, L. Moore, M. R. Shaw, S. Thayer, T. Tobeck, H. A. Mooney, and C. B. Field. 2005. Responses of grassland production to single and multiple global environmental changes. PLoS Biology 3:e319.
14. Dukes, J. S., and H. A. Mooney. 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:135-139. (Pubitemid 29135462)
15. Fenn, M. E., R. Haeuber, G. S. Tonnesen, J. S. Baron, S. Grossman-Clarke, D. Hope, D. A. Jaffe, S. Copeland, L. Geiser, H. M. Rueth, and J. O. Sickman. 2003. Nitrogen emissions, deposition, and monitoring in the western United States. BioScience 53:391-403. (Pubitemid 36453250)
16. Gonzalez, A. L., J. S. Kominoski, M. Danger, S. Ishida, N. Iwai, and A. Rubach. 2010. Can ecological stoichiometry help explain patterns of biological invasions? Oikos 119:779-790.
17. Gutierrez, A. P., M. J. Pitcairn, C. K. Ellis, N. Carruthers, and R. Ghezelbash. 2005. Evaluating biological control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in California: a GIS based supply-demand demographic model. Biological Control 34:115-131. (Pubitemid 41003979)
18. 2 facilitate naturalization of the non-indigenous Prunus laurocerasus in Swiss temperate forests? Functional Ecology 17 778-785. (Pubitemid 38042924)
19. 2, and N deposition on a California annual grassland. Ecosystems 9:1066-1075. (Pubitemid 44833196)
20. Mackenzie, A. 2004. The plants: How to remove Bay Area weeds. Pages 53-111 in C. Harrington and A. Hayes, editors. The weed workers' handbook: a guide to techniques for removing Bay Area invasive plants. The Watershed Project and California Invasive Plant Council, Berkeley, California, USA.
21. Maddox, D. M., A. Mayfield, and N. H. Poritz. 1985. Distribution of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Science 33:315-327.
22. 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:9086-9089. (Pubitemid 43902537)
23. Morgan, J. A., D. G. Milchunas, D. R. LeCain, M. West, and A. R. Mosier. 2007. Carbon dioxide enrichment alters plant community structure and accelerates shrub growth in the shortgrass steppe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:14724-14729. (Pubitemid 350003210)
24. Morghan, K. J. R., and K. J. Rice. 2006. Variation in resource availability changes the impact of invasive thistles on native bunchgrasses. Ecological Applications 16:528-539.
25. Pitcairn, M. J., S. Schoenig, R. Yacoub, and J. Gendron. 2006. Yellow starthistle continues its spread in California. California Agriculture 60:83-90.
26. Roché , B. F. Jr. C. T. Roché , and R. C. Chapman. 1994. Impacts of grassland habitat on yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) invasion. Northwest Science 68:86-96. (Pubitemid 2115159)
27. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
28. Scherer-Lorenzen, M., H. Olde Venterink, and H. Buschmann. 2007. Nitrogen enrichment and plant invasions: the importance of nitrogen-fixing plants and anthropogenic eutrophication.Pages 163-180 in W. Nentwig, editor. Biological invasions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
29. 2. Science 298:1987-1990. (Pubitemid 35425253)
30. Sheley, R. L., and L. L. Larson. 1994. Comparative growth and interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle seedlings. Journal of Range Management 47:470-474.
31. Sheley, R. L., and L. L. Larson. 1995. Interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle at 3 soil depths. Journal of Range Management 48:392-397. (Pubitemid 26469768)
32. 2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408:79-82.
33. 2 enrichment alter demographics in four cooccurring grassland species. New Phytologist 176:365-374. (Pubitemid 47480877)
34. Willis, C. G., B. R. Ruhfel, R. B. Primack, A. J. Miller- Rushing, J. B. Losos, and C. C. Davis. 2010. Favorable climate change response explains non-native species' success in Thoreau's woods. PLoS ONE 5:e8878.
35. Ziska, L. H. 2003. Evaluation of the growth response of six invasive species to past, present and future atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Experimental Botany 54:395-404. (Pubitemid 36101177)
36. Ziska, L. H., and J. S. Dukes. 2011. Weed biology and climate change. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, USA.