Clinical research using an information system: The multicenter perioperative outcomes group

Anesthesiology Clinics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 377-388

  Kheterpal, Sachin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic records; Information system; Observational research; Perioperative medicine

Indexed keywords

ALFENTANIL; AMIKACIN; AMINOCAPROIC ACID; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CEFAZOLIN; HYPERTENSIVE FACTOR; PROPOFOL; PROSTAGLANDIN E1; SALBUTAMOL; VANCOMYCIN;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ANESTHESIA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMORBIDITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DRUG IDENTIFICATION; DRUG NOMENCLATURE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL HISTORY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PATIENTS; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80051961834     PISSN: 19322275     EISSN: 22103538     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.06.002     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Stonemetz J, Schubert A. AIMS. American Society of Anesthesiologists Newsletter. 2011;75(6):10-2.
2. Kheterpal S., Woodrum D.T., Tremper K.K. Too much of a good thing is wonderful: observational data for perioperative research. Anesthesiology 2009, 111(6):1183-1184.
3. AIMS and sharing your patient data - a resource for potential users. 2011. Available at: Accessed June 10, 2011. http://aqihq.org/cim.aspx.
4. Health Information Technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Final Rule. Federal Register July 28, 2010;75(144):44590-654. Print.
5. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 2nd edition. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc. d/b/a Outcome] under Contract No. HHSA29020050035I TO3.) AHRQ Publication No.10-EHC049. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. p. 143-67.
6. Digital signature standard 2009, 130. Federal Information Processing Standards Publication, Gaithersburg (MD), Available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/fips180-4/Draft-FIPS180-4_Feb2011.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2011. Department of Commerce NIoSaT (Ed.).
7. Shiloach M., Frencher S.K., Steeger J.E., et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2010, 210(1):6-16.
8. Reich D.L., Wood R.K., Mattar R., et al. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between handwritten and computerized anesthesia records. Anesth Analg 2000, 91(3):612-616.
9. Hermansen S.W., Leitzmann M.F., Schatzkin A. The impact on National Death Index ascertainment of limiting submissions to Social Security Administration Death Master File matches in epidemiologic studies of mortality. Am J Epidemiol 2009, 169(7):901-908.