The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy

Res Publica

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 275-290

  Rubel, Alan ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

Information ethics; Particularized judgments; Privacy; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051951541     PISSN: 13564765     EISSN: 15728692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11158-011-9160-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allen, Anita. 1988. Uneasy access: Privacy for women in a free society. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
2. Barbaro, Michael and Tom Zeller Jr. 2006. A face is exposed for AOL searcher no. 4417749. New York Times, August 9.
3. Beardsley, Elizabeth. 1971. Privacy, autonomy, and selective disclosure. In NOMOS XIII: Privacy, ed. J. Roland Pennock, and John W. Chapman, 65-70. New York: Atherton Press.
4. Christensen, David. 1997. What is relative confirmation? Noûs 31: 370-384.
5. DeCew, Judith. 1997. In pursuit of privacy: Law, ethics, and the rise of technology. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.
6. Fetzer, James. 2004. Information: Does it have to be true? Minds and Machines 14: 223-229.
7. Floridi, Luciano. 2004. Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information. Minds and Machines 14: 197-221.
8. Fried, Charles. 1984. Privacy [a moral analysis]. In Philosophical dimensions of privacy, ed. Ferdinand Schoeman, 203-222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Gavison, Ruth. 1984. Privacy and the limits of law. In Philosophical dimensions of privacy, ed. Ferdinand Schoeman, 346-402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Gross, Hyman. 1971. Privacy and autonomy. In NOMOS XIII: Privacy, ed. J. Roland Pennock, and John W. Chapman, 169-181. New York: Atherton Press.
11. Inness, Julie. 1992. Privacy, intimacy, and isolation. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Moore, Adam. 2010. Privacy rights: Moral and legal foundations. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
13. Narayanan, Arvind and Vitaly Shmatikov. 2008. Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy: 111-122.
14. Ohm, Paul. 2009. Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review 57: 1701-1777.
15. Parent, W. A. 1983. Privacy, morality, and the law. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12: 269-288.
16. Pick, Daniel. 1989. Faces of degeneration: A European disorder, c. 1848-c. 1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Posner, Richard. 2006. Not a suicide pact: The constitution in a time of national emergency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Powers, Madison. 1996. A cognitive access definition of privacy. Law and Philosophy 15: 369-386.
19. Rachels, James. 1975. Why privacy is important. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 323-333.
20. Rubel, Alan. 2007. Claims to privacy and the distributed value view. San Diego Law Review 44: 921-956.
21. Solove, Daniel. 2002. Conceptualizing privacy. California Law Review 90: 1087-1155.
22. Sweeney, Latanya. 2000. Uniqueness of simple demographics in the U. S. population. Laboratory for International Data Privacy, Working Paper LIDAP-WP4.
23. Tokson, Matthew. 2011. Automation and the fourth amendment. Iowa Law Review 96: 581-647.
24. van Den Haag, Ernest. 1971. On privacy. In NOMOS XIII: Privacy, ed. J. Roland Pennock, and John W. Chapman, 149-168. New York: Atherton Press.
25. Westin, Alan. 1967. Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
26. Young, Robert. 1970. Mind, brain and adaptation in the nineteenth century: Cerebral localization and its biological context from Gall to Ferrier. Oxford: Clarendon Press.