Flow-rate behavior and imbibition in shale

SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 505-512

  Wang, Dongmei ^a   Butler, Raymond ^a   Liu, Hong ^a   Ahmed, Salowah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW OF FLUIDS; POROSITY; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

BRINE INJECTION; DARCY EQUATIONS; ENHANCE OIL RECOVERIES; MEASUREMENTS OF; MINERAL DISSOLUTION; OIL RECOVERIES; OIL SATURATION; ORIGINAL OIL IN PLACES;

SHALE;

BRINE; CRACKING; DARCY LAW; DISSOLUTION; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; FLOW FIELD; IMBIBITION; OUTCROP; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; SHALE; SOURCE ROCK; SURFACTANT;

NORTH DAKOTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80051948434     PISSN: 10946470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/138521-pa     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Cheatham, C.A. and Nahm, J.J. 1990. Bit Balling in Water-Reactive Shale During Full-Scale Drilling Rate Tests. Paper SPE 19926 presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Houston, 27 February-2 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/ 19926-MS.
2. Chenevert, M.E. and Sharma, A.K. 1993. Permeability and Effective Pore Pressure of Shales. SPE Drill & Compl 8 (1): 28-34; Trans, AIME, 295. SPE-21918-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/21918-PA. (Pubitemid 23391548)
3. Cramer, D.D. 1986. Reservoir Characteristics and Stimulation Techniques in the Bakken Formation and Adjacent Beds, Billings Nose Area, Williston Basin. Paper SPE 15166 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Billings, Montana, USA, 19-21 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15166-MS.
4. Gosnold, W.D. 1990. Heat Flow in the Great Plains of the United States. J. of Geophysical Research 95 (B1): 353-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/ JB095iB01p00353.
5. Luffel, D.L., Hopkins, C.W., and Schettler, P.D. Jr. 1993. Matrix Permeability Measurement of Gas Productive Shales. Paper SPE 26633 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/26633-MS.
6. Luo, Y., Davidson, B., and Dusseault, M. 1996. Measurements In Ultra-low Permeability Media With Time-varying Properties. Paper EUROCK-1996-157 presented at the ISRM International Symposium (EUROCK '96), Turin, Italy, 2-5 September.
7. Matthews, C.S. and Russell, D.G. 1967. Pressure Buildup and Flow Tests in Wells. Monograph Series, SPE, Richardson, Texas, USA, 1.
8. Neuzil, C.E. 1993. Low fluid pressure within the Pierre Shale: A transient response to erosion. Water Resour. Res. 29 (7): 2007-2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/93WR00406. (Pubitemid 24395080)
9. Osisanya, S.O. 1995. Estimation of Average Permeability of Shale from Swelling Data. J Can Pet Technol 34 (8): 50-55. JCPT Paper No. 95-08-05. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95-08-05.
10. Pitman, J.K., Price, L.C., and LeFever, J.A. 2001. Diagenesis and Fracture Development in the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin: Implications for Reservoir Quality in the Middle Member. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1653, Version 1.0, US Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
11. Reyes, L. and Osisanya, S.O. 2002. Empirical Correlation of Effective Stress Dependent Shale Rock Properties. J Can Pet Technol 41 (12): 47-53. JCPT Paper No. 02-12-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/02-12-02.
12. Sanyal, S.K., Pirnie, R.M. III, Chen, G.O., and Marsden, S.S. Jr. 1972. A Novel Liquid Permeameter for Measuring Very Low Permeability. SPE J. 12 (3): 206-210. SPE-3099-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3099-PA.
13. Tang, G.-Q. and Firoozabadi, A. 2002. Relative Permeability Modification in Gas/Liquid Systems Through Wettability to Intermediate Gas Wetting. SPE Res Eval & Eng 5 (6): 427-436. SPE-81195-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/81195-PA. (Pubitemid 36234506)