Chapter 3: Circum-Arctic mapping project: New magnetic and gravity anomaly maps of the Arctic

Geological Society Memoir

Volumn 35, Issue , 2011, Pages 39-48

  gaina, Carmen ^a,b   werner, Stephanie C ^b   saltus, Richard ^c   maus, Stefan ^d   Aaro, S ^e   Damaske, D ^e   Forsberg, R ^e   Glebovsky, V ^e   Johnson, K ^e   Jonberger, J ^e   Koren, T ^e   Korhonen, J ^e   Litvinova, T ^e   Oakey, G ^e   Olesen, O ^e   Petrov, O ^e   Pilkington, M ^e   Rasmussen, T ^e   Schreckenberger, B ^e   Smelror, M ^e  

^a GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF NORWAY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIN EVOLUTION; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; GRAVITY ANOMALY; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIC PROPERTY; SATELLITE DATA; TECTONIC SETTING;

ARCTIC;

EID: 80051943999     PISSN: 04354052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1144/M35.3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Amante, C.&Eakins, B. W. 2008. ETOPO1 1 Arc-minute global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis, Nesdis, N. (ed.) US Department of Commerce. National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO.
2. Damaske, D. & Oakey, G. 2006. Volcanogenic sandstones as aeromagnetic markers on Judge Daly promontory and in Robeson Channel. Polarforshung, 74, 9-19.
3. Foerste, C., Schmidt, R. et al. 2008. The GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam/Groupe de Recherche de Geodesie Spatiale satellite-only and combined gravity field models: EIGEN-GL04S1 and EIGENGL04C. Journal of Geodesy, 82, 331-346.
4. Gautier, D. 2008. U.S. Geological Survey Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: oil and gas potential of the high northern latitudes. International Geological Conference (33rd IGC), Oslo.
5. Gernigon, L., Olesen, O. et al. 2009. Geophysical insights and early spreading history in the vicinity of the Jan Mayen Fracture Zone, Norwegian-Greenland Sea. Tectonophysics, 468, 185-205.
6. Grantz, A., Johnson, L. & Sweeney, J. F. (eds) 1990. The Arctic Ocean Region, L. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.
7. Harrison, J. C., St-Onge, M. R. et al. 2008. Geological Map of the Arctic. Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary, Open File 5816.
8. Heezen, B. C. & Ewing, M. 1961. The Mod-oceanic ridge and its extension through the Arctic Basin. In: Raasch, G. O. (ed.) Geology of the Arctic, 1. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 622-642.
9. Heezen, B. C. & Tharp, M. 1975. Bathymetry of the Arctic region. In: Pinther, M. (ed.) Map of the Arctic Region. American Geographical Society, New York.
10. Hemant, K., Thebault, E., Mandea, M., Ravat, D. & Maus, S. 2007. Magnetic anomaly map of the world: merging satellite, airborne, marine and ground-based magnetic data sets. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 260, 56-71.
11. Jakobsson, M., Grantz, A., Kristoffersen, Y. & Macnab, R. 2003. Physiographic provinces of the arctic ocean seafloor. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 115, 1443-1455.
12. Jakobsson, M., Macnab, R. et al. 2008. An improved bathymetric portrayal of the Arctic Ocean: implications for ocean modeling and geological, geophysical and oceanographic analyses. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L07602, doi: 10.1029/2008GL033520.
13. Kenyon, S., Forsberg, R. & Coakley, B. 2008. New gravity field for the Arctic. EOS, 89, 1-2.
14. Kuzmichev, A. B. 2009. Where does te South Anyui suture go in the New Siberian islands and Laptev Sea?: implications for the Amerasia basin origin. Tectonophysics, 463, 86-108.
15. Laske, G., Masters, T. G. & Anonymous 1997. A global digital map of sediment thickness. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 78, 483.
16. Laxon, S. & Mcadoo, D. 1994. Arctic-Ocean gravity-field derived from Ers-1 Satellite altimetry. Science, 265, 621-624.
17. Maus, S., Luhr, H. et al. 2007. Fifth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite measurements. Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geosystems, 8, Q06017, doi: 10.1029/2007GC001643.
18. Maus, S., Yin, F. et al. 2008. Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements. Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geosystems, 9, Q07021, doi: 10.1029/2008GC001949.
19. Miller, H. G. & Singh, V. 1994. Potential-field tilt - a new concept for location of potential-field sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 32, 213-217.
20. Nairn, A. E. M., Churkin, M. & Stehli, F. T. (eds) 1981. The Arctic Ocean, 5. Plenum, New York.
21. Oakey, G. & Damaske, D. 2006. Structural elements of the Kane Basin region of Nares Strait constrained by aeromagnetic data. Polarforshung, 74, 51-62.
22. Olesen, O., Gellein, J., Habrekke, H., Kihle, O., Skilbrei, J. R. & Smethurst, M. A. 1997. Magnetic Anomaly Map, Norway and Adjacent Areas, pp. Map Scale 1:3 000 000. Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim.
23. Olesen, O., Ebbing, J. et al. 2007. An improved tectonic model for the Eocene opening of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea: use of modern magnetic data. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 24, 53-66.
24. Rasmussen, T. M. 2002. Aeromagnetic survey in the central West Greenland: project Aeromag 2001. Geology of Greenland Survey Bulletin, 191, 67-72.
25. Verhoef, J., Roest, W. R., Macnab, R. & Arkani, H. J. 1996. Magnetic Anomalies of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans and Adjacent Areas, CD Compilation. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa.