Impact on informed choice of offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening in primary care: A randomized trial

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 65-75

  Brown, Katrina ^a   Dormandy, Elizabeth ^b   Reid, Erin ^a   Gulliford, Martin ^b   Marteau, Theresa ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SICKLE CELL ANEMIA; STATISTICS; THALASSEMIA;

ADULT; ANEMIA, SICKLE CELL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; THALASSEMIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051899652     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 14755793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.010132     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. National Screening Committee. Second Report of the UK National Screening Committee. London: Department of Health; 2000
2. NHS Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme. Standards for linked antenatal and newborn screening programme [Internet]. London: UK National Screening Programme; 2006. Cited June 2007. Available from: Http://www.sct.screening.nhs.uk/getdata.php?id=1062 (last accessed August 2011)
3. EuroGentest. Recommendations for genetic counselling related to genetic testing (final version). Belgium: EuroGentest; 2008. Cited June 2009. Available from: Http://www.eurogentest.org/professionals/documents/info/public/unit3/ final-recommendations-genetic-counselling.xhtml (last accessed August 2011)
4. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001;4:99-108 (Pubitemid 32464021)
5. Modell B, Harris R, Lane B, et al. Informed choice in genetic screening for thalassaemia during pregnancy: Audit from a national confidential inquiry. BMJ 2000;320:337-41 (Pubitemid 30083182)
6. Greengross P, Hickman M, Gill M, Dugan B, Davies SC. Outcomes of universal antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies. J Med Screen 1999;6:3-10 (Pubitemid 29164737)
7. Dormandy E, Gulliford M, Bryan S, et al. Delivering earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell and thalassaemia in primary care: The SHIFT cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2010;341:c5132
8. Neighbourhood Statisitics. National Statistics. London: Office for National Statistics; 2001. Cited June 2007. Available from: Http://www. neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/ (last accessed August 2011)
9. NHS SCT screening programme. Policy Framework for Antenatal Screening Programme for England. London: UK National Screening Committee. Cited June 2007. Available from: Http://sct.screening.nhs.uk/ cms.php?folder=2424 (last accessed August 2011)
10. Dormandy E, Bryan S, Gulliford MC, et al. Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: A cohort study and cluster randomised trial to inform a simulation model. The Screening for Haemoglobinopathies in First Trimester (SHIFT) trial. Health Technol Assess 2010;14
11. Evans S, Royston P, Day S. Minim: Allocation by minimisation in clinical trials. Accessed September 2007. Available at: Http://www-users.york.ac. uk/~mb55/guide/minim.htm
12. Dormandy E, Tsui E, Marteau TM. Development of a measure of informed choice suitable for use in a low literacy population. Patient Educ Couns 2007;66:278-95 (Pubitemid 46726946)
13. General Medical Council. Consent: Patients and doctors making decisions together. London: General Medical Council; 2008. Cited June 2009. Available from: Http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/ Consent-0510.pdf (last accessed August 2011)
14. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The English Indices of Deprivation 2004 (revised). London: The Stationery Office; 2004. Accessed October 2007. Available from: Http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk// http://www. communities.gov.uk/archived/general-content/communities/ indicesofdeprivation/ 216309/ (last accessed August 2011)
15. Dormandy E, Brown K, Reid EP, Marteau TM. Towards socially inclusive research: An evaluation of telephone questionnaire administration in a multilingual population. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:2
16. Moser C. Improving Literacy and Numeracy: A Fresh Start. 1999. Accessed June 2009. Available from: Www.lifelonglearning.co.uk/ mosergroup/ (last accessed August 2011)
17. Dormandy E, Hooper R, Michie S, Marteau TM. Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening: A comparison of two hospitals conducting testing either as part of a routine visit or requiring a separate visit. J Med Screen 2002;9:109-14 (Pubitemid 35205232)
18. Dormandy E, Hooper R, Michie S, Marteau TM. Informed choice in antenatal Down syndrome screening: A cluster randomised trial of two methods of conducting the test. Patient Educ Couns 2006;61:56-64
19. Van den Berg OM, Timmermans D, Kleinveld JH, Garcia E, Van Vugt JMG, Van der Wall G. Accepting or declining the offer of prenatal screening for congenital defects: Test uptake and women's responses. Prenatal Diag 2005;25:84-90 (Pubitemid 40193734)
20. Willems S, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maeseneer J. Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: Does it make adifference? Patient Educ Couns 2005;56:139-46 (Pubitemid 40093811)
21. Waitzkin H, Borges S. Women's narratives in primary care medical encounters. Public Medicine 1995;23:29-56
22. Pendleton OD, Bochner S. The Communication of Medical Information in General Practice Consultations as a Function of Patients' Social Class. Soc Sci Med 1980;14:669-73
23. Ferguson WJ, Candib LM. Culture, language, and doctor-patient relationship. Fam Med 2002;34:353-61
24. Feveile H, Olsen O, Hogh A. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: Response patterns in asurvey. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:27
25. Tsianakas V, Liamputtong P. What women from an Islamic background in Australia say about care in pregnancy and prenatal testing. Midwifery 2002;18:25-34 (Pubitemid 40434357)
26. Locock L, Kai J. Parents' experiences of universal screening for haemoglobin disorders: Implications for practice in a new genetics era. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:161-8 (Pubitemid 351377064)
27. Ahmed S, Green J, Hewison J. Antenatal thalassaemia carrier testing: Women's perceptions of 'information' and 'consent'. J Med Screen 2005;12:69-77 (Pubitemid 40835137)
28. Alswaidi FM, O'Brien SJ. Premarital screening programmes for haemoglobinopathies, HIV and hepatitis viruses: Review and factors affecting their success. J Med Screen 2009;16:22-8
29. Shaw C, Abrams K, Marteau TM. Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risk of illness: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:1571-98 (Pubitemid 29428059)
30. Dormandy E, Marteau TM. Uptake of a prenatal screening test: The role of healthcare professionals' attitudes towards thetest. Prenatal Diagnosis 2004;24:864-8 (Pubitemid 39576799)
31. van den Berg M, Timmermans DRM, Kleinveld JH, et al. Are counsellors' attitudes influencing pregnant women's attitudes and decisions on prenatal screening? Prenatal Diagnosis 2007;27:518-24 (Pubitemid 46997667)
32. Crockett R, Wright A, Uus K, Bamford J, Marteau TM. Maternal anxiety following newborn hearing screening: The moderating role of knowledge. J Med Screen 2006;13:20-25 (Pubitemid 43843760)
33. Wilkinson C, Jones JM, McBride J. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: A controlled trial. BMJ 1990;300:440 (Pubitemid 20069267)
34. Fox R. Informed choice in screening programmes: Do leaflets help? A critical literature review. J Pub Health 2006;28:309-17 (Pubitemid 44863319)
35. Baker H, Uus K, Bamford J, Marteau TM. Why don't health professionals check patient understanding? A questionnaire based study. Psychology, Health & Medicine 2006;12:380-5 (Pubitemid 46788985)
36. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: Systematic review. BMJ 1999;319:731-4 (Pubitemid 29431525)