Requirements prioritization with respect to Geographically Distributed Stakeholders

Proceedings - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering, CSAE 2011

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 290-294

  Ahmad, Azeem ^a   Shahzad, Aamir ^a   Padmanabhuni, V Kumar ^a   Mansoor, Ali ^a   Joseph, Sushma ^a   Arshad, Zaki ^a  

^a BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

100 Method; BST; Geographically Distributed Stakeholders; Modified 100 Method; Modified BST; Requirements Prioritization

Indexed keywords

100$ METHOD; BST; GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED STAKEHOLDERS; MODIFIED 100$ METHOD; MODIFIED BST; REQUIREMENTS PRIORITIZATION;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; PLANT EXTRACTS;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 80051876897     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSAE.2011.5952853     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Daniela E. Damian, Didar Zowghi, "The impact of stakeholders' geographical distribution on managing requirements in a multi-site organization" University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
2. V. Basili, "The role of controlled experiments in software engineering research", Empirical Software Engineering Issues. Critical Assessment and Future Directions, 2007, pp. 33-37. (Pubitemid 350143434)
3. L. Lehtola, Providing value by prioritizing requirements throughout product development: state of practice and suitability of prioritization methods. Ph. D. Thesis. HUT/Departure of Computer Science, 2006.
4. F. Moisiadis, A framework for prioritizing software requirements, Ph. D. thesis, Macquarie University, Australia, July 2003.
5. V. Basili et al. (Eds.)", The Role of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering Research, Empirical Software Engineering Issues, LNCS 4336, p33-37, 2007 © Spinger Verlag Berline Heidelberg 2007 Issues (Pubitemid 350143434)
6. Albert C. Yeh, "REQUirements Engineering Support Technique (REQEST) A Market Driven Requirements Management Process", IBM Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
7. Joachim Karlsson, "Software Requirements Prioritizing", SoftLab ab Datalinjen 1 S-583 30 Linkoping, Sweden
8. Mikio Aoyama, "Management of Distributed Concurrent Development for Large-scale Software Systems", Department of Information and Electronics Engineering Niigata Institute of Technology 1719 F'ujihashi, Kashiwazaki 945-11, Japan.
9. Zsolt Haag, Richard Foley, Julian Newman, "Software Process Improvement in Geographically Distributed Software Engineering: An Initial Evaluation", Glasgow Caledonian University Department of Computing and Information Systems 70 Cowcaddens Road Glasgow G4 OBA United Kingdom
10. Jung-Won Park, Daniel Port, Barry Boehm, "Supporting Distributed Collaborative Prioritization", IEEE.
11. Daniela Damian, "An empirical study of requirements engineering in distributed software projects: is distance negotiation more effective?", Faculty of Information Technology University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 123, Broadway, Australia
12. Daniela Damian, Requirements Engineering in Distributed Projects, Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Canada.
13. Daniela Damian, Stakeholders in Global Requirements Engineering: Lessons Learned from Practice, Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Canada.
14. Betty H. C Cheng and Joanne M. Atlee", Research Directions in Requirements Engineering", Future of Software Engineering (FOSE'07), © 2007 IEEE.
15. B. Nuseibeh, S. Easterbrook. Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Soft. Eng. (ICSE), pages 35-46, 2000.
16. Andrzej Sobczak A, Daniel M. Berry", Distributed priority ranking of strategic preliminary requirements for management information systems in economic organizations", Information and Software Technology 49 (2007) 960-984. (Pubitemid 47021351)
17. Daniela E. Damian Æ Didar Zowghi", RE challenges in multi-site software development organizations", Springer-Verlag London Limited 2003.
18. Joachim Karlsson, Claes Wohlin, Bjijrn Regnell, "An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements", Information and Software Technology 39 (1998) 939-947 (Pubitemid 128394300)
19. J. W. Creswell", Research Design: Qualitativ, Quntative and Mixed Method Approaches", 2nd edition, Sage Publication, 2002
20. Liming Zhu, Aybü Ke Aurum, Ian Gorton, Ross Jeffery", Tradeoff and Sensitivity Analysis in Software Architecture Evaluation Using Analytic Hierarchy Process", Software Quality Journal, 13, 357-375, 2005, Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Manufactured in The Netherlands. (Pubitemid 41651313)
21. http://www.forensic.cc/newsletter/power-failures visited on July 5, 2010
22. Azeem Ahmad, Magnus Goransson, Amir Shahzad, Limitations of AHP with Respect to Geographically Distributed Stakeholders, Proceedings of International Conference on knowledge and Software Engineering, Amsterdam, Netherland 2010.