Field screening for genetic-based susceptibility to mammalian browsing

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 262, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1500-1506

  Miller, Alison M ^a,b   O'Reilly Wapstra, Julianne M ^a,b   Potts, Brad M ^a,b   McArthur, Clare ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b Cooperative Research Centre for Forestry ^*  (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Browsing damage; Eucalyptus; Forestry; Plant secondary metabolites; Resistance

Indexed keywords

BROWSING DAMAGE; COST-EFFECTIVE MEANS; EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT; EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS; GERMPLASMS; GLOBULUS; HIGH-RISK AREAS; MAMMALIAN BROWSING; MAMMALIAN HERBIVORES; NATURAL VARIATION; PLANT SECONDARY METABOLITES; PLANTATION FORESTRY; SEEDLOTS; TREE GROWTH;

MAMMALS; METABOLISM; METABOLITES; PLANT EXTRACTS; SEED; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

BROWSING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GERMPLASM; GROWTH RATE; HERBIVORE; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANTATION; REPELLENT; SECONDARY METABOLITE; SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT; SHRUB; VULNERABILITY;

EUCALYPTUS; EXTRACTIVES; FORESTRY; FORESTS; MAMMALS; METABOLISM; PLANTS; RESISTANCE; SEEDS;

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 80051828368     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.051     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andelt W.F., Burnham K.P., Manning J.A. Relative effectiveness of repellents for reducing mule deer damage. J. Wildlife Manage. 1991, 55:341-347.
2. Andrew R.L., Peakall R., Wallis I.R., Wood J.T., Knight E.J., Foley W.J. Marker-based quantitative genetics in the wild?: the heritability and genetic correlation of chemical defenses in eucalyptus. Genetics 2005, 171:1989-1998.
3. Andrew R.L., Wallis I.R., Harwood C.E., Henson M., Foley W.J. Heritable variation in the foliar secondary metabolite sideroxylonal in Eucalyptus confers cross-resistance to herbivores. Oecologia 2007, 153:891-901.
4. Bendfeldt E.S., Feldhake C.M., Burger J.A. Establishing trees in an Appalachian silvopasture: response to shelters, grass control, mulch, and fertilization. Agroforest. Syst. 2001, 53:291-295.
5. Bulinski J., McArthur C. Spatial distribution of browsing damage and mammalian herbivores in Tasmanian eucalypt plantations. Aust. For. 2000, 63:27-33.
6. Bulinski J., McArthur C. Identifying factors related to the severity of mammalian browsing damage in eucalypt plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 183:239-247.
7. DeGabriel J.L., Moore B.D., Foley W.J., Johnson C.N. The effects of plant defensive chemistry on nutrient availability predict reproductive success in a mammal. Ecology 2009, 90:711-719.
8. Devine W.D., Harrington C.A., Leonard L.P. Post-planting treatments increase growth of oregon white oak (Quercus garryana Dougl. ex Hook.) seedlings. Restor. Ecol. 2007, 15:212-222.
9. Dimock E.J., Silen R.R., Allen V.E. Genetic resistance in Douglas-fir to damage by snowshoe hare and black-tailed deer. Forest Sci. 1976, 22:106-121.
10. Dutkowski G.W., Potts B.M. Geographic patterns of genetic variation in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus and a revised racial classification. Aust. J. Bot. 1999, 47:237-263.
11. Edwards P.B., Wanjura W.J., Brown W.V. Selective herbivory by Christmas beetles in response to intraspecific variation in Eucalyptus terpenoids. Oecologia 1993, 95:551-557.
12. Foley W.J., McIlwee A., Lawler I., Aragones L., Woolnough A.P., Berding N. Ecological applications of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy - a tool for rapid, cost-effective prediction of the composition of plant and animal tissues and aspects of animal performance. Oecologia 1998, 116:293-305.
13. Fraenkel G.S. The raison d'être of secondary plant substances. Science 1959, 129:1466-1470.
14. Freeland W.J., Janzen D.H. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am. Nat. 1974, 108:269-289.
15. Freeman J.S., O'Reilly-Wapstra J.M., Vaillancourt R.E., Wiggins N., Potts B.M. Quantitative trait loci for key defensive compounds affecting herbivory of eucalypts in Australia. New Phytolog. 2008, 178:846-851.
16. Gill R.M.A. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1 Deer. Forestry 1992, 65:145-169.
17. Graham H.D. Stabilization of the prussian blue color in the determination of polyphenols. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40:801-805.
18. Hagerman A.E. Tannin Chemistry 2002, Oxford, Miami University.
19. Hertel H., Kaetzel R. Susceptibility of Norway spruce clones (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) to insects and roe deer in relation to genotype and foliar phytochemistry. Phyton- Annales Rei Botanicae 1999, 39:65-72.
20. Humphreys J.R., O'Reilly-Wapstra J.M., Harbard J.L., Davies N.W., Griffin A.R., Jordan G.J., Potts B.M. Discrimination between seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus, E. nitens and their F1 hybrid using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and foliar oil content. Silvae Genet. 2008, 57:262-269.
21. Jia J., Niemela P., Rousi M., Harkonen S. Selective browsing of moose (Alces alces) on birch (Betula pendula) clones. Scand. J. For. Res. 1997, 12:33-40.
22. Lawler I.R., Eschler B.M., Schliebs D.M., Foley W.J. Relationship between chemical functional groups on Eucalyptus secondary metabolites and their effectiveness as marsupial antifeedants. J. Chem. Ecol. 1999, 25:2561-2573.
23. Lawler I.R., Foley W.J., Eschler B.M. Foliar concentrations of a single toxin creates habitat patchiness for a marsupial folivore. Ecology 2000, 81:1327-1338.
24. Lawler I.R., Foley W.J., Eschler B.M., Pass D.M., Handasyde K. Intraspecific variation in Eucalyptus secondary metabolites determines food intake by folivorous marsupials. Oecologia 1998, 116:160-169.
25. Leimu R., Koricheva J. A meta-analysis of genetic correlations between plant resistances to multiple enemies. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:E15-E37.
26. Marsh K.J., Foley W.J., Cowling A., Wallis I.R. Differential susceptibility to Eucalyptus secondary compounds explains feeding by the common ringtail (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). J. Comp. Physiol. B 2003, 173:69-78.
27. Miller A.M., O'Reilly-Wapstra J.M., Potts B.M., McArthur C. Non-lethal strategies to reduce browse damage in eucalypt plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 259:45-55.
28. Moore B.D., Wallis I.R., Pala-Paul J., Brophy J.J., Willis R.H., Foley W.J. Anitherbivore chemistry of Eucalyptus-cues and deterrents for marsupial folivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 2004, 30:1743-1768.
29. Mutikainen P., Walls M., Ovaska J., Keinanen M., Julkunen-Tiitto R., Vapaavuori E. Herbivore resistance in Betula pendula: effect of fertilization, defoliation, and plant genotype. Ecology 2000, 81:49-65.
30. O'Reilly-Wapstra J.M., McArthur C., Potts B.M. Genetic variation in resistance of Eucalyptus globulus to marsupial browsers. Oecologia 2002, 130:289-296.
31. O'Reilly-Wapstra J.M., McArthur C., Potts B.M. Linking plant genotype, plant defensive chemistry and mammal browsing in a Eucalyptus species. Funct. Ecol. 2004, 18:677-684.
32. O'Reilly-Wapstra J., Freeman J., Davies N., Vaillancourt R., Fitzgerald H., Potts B. Quantitative trait loci for foliar terpenes in a global eucalypt species. Tree Genet. Genom. 2011, 7:485-498.
33. O'Reilly-Wapstra J.M., Bailey J.K., McArthur C., Potts B.M. Genetic- and chemical-based resistance to two mammalian herbivores varies across the geographic range of Eucalyptus globulus. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2010, 12:491-505.
34. Oswalt C.M., Clatterbuck W.K., Houston A.E. Impacts of deer herbivory and visual grading on the early performance of high-quality oak planting stock in Tennessee, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 229:128-135.
35. Porter L.J., Hrstich L.N., Chan B.G. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 1986, 25:223-230.
36. Potts B.M., Dungey H.S. Interspecific hybridization of Eucalyptus: key issues for breeders and geneticists. New For. 2004, 27:115-138.
37. Potts B.M., Vaillancourt R.E., Jordan G.J., Dutkowski G.W., Costa e Silva J., McKinnon G.E., Steane D.A., Volker P.W., Lopez G.A., Apiolaza L.A., Li J., Marques C., Borralho N.M.G. Exploration of the Eucalyptus globulus gene pool. Eucalyptus in a Changing World 2004, International IUFRO Conference, Aveiro, Portugal.
38. Russell J.H., Ferguson D.C. Western redcedar browse resistance breeding and deployment material. A Tale of Two Cedars: International Symposium on Western Redcedar and Yellow-cedar 2010, 160-162. United States Department of Agriculture, Vancouver Island, Canada. C.A. Harrington (Ed.).
39. Russell J.H., Kimball B.A. Summary of western redcedar browse resistance research. A Tale of Two Cedars: International Symposium on Western Redcedar and Yellow-cedar 2010, 163-165. United States Department of Agriculture, Vancouver Island, Canada. C.A. Harrington (Ed.).
40. SAS 9.1.2. 2004, SAS Institute Inc., SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
41. South D.B., Mason W.L. Influence of differences in planting stock size on early height growth of sitka spruce. Forestry 1993, 66:83-96.
42. Statham H.L. Browsing Damage in Tasmanian Forest Areas and Effects of 1080 Poisoning 1983, Forestry Commission, Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, p. 261.
43. Strauss S.Y., Irwin R.E. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Systemat. 2004, 35:435-466.
44. Strauss S.Y., Rudgers J.A., Lau J.A., Irwin R.E. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:278-285.
45. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 2001, Pearson Education Company, Needham Heights, MA.
46. Volker P.W., Orme R.K. Provenance trials of Eucalyptus globulus and related species in Tasmania. Aust. For. 1988, 51:257-265.
47. Vourc'h G., Russell J., Martin J.L. Linking deer browsing and terpene production among genetic identities in Chamaecyparis nootkatensis and Thuja plicata (Cupressaceae). J. Hered. 2002, 93:370-376.
48. Wallis I.R., Foley W.J. The rapid determination of sideroxylonals in Eucalyptus foliage by extraction with sonication followed by HPLC. Phytochem. Anal. 2005, 16:49-54.
49. Wallis I.R., Watson M.L., Foley W.J. Secondary metabolites in Eucalyptus melliodora: field distribution and laboratory feeding choices by a generalist herbivore, the common brushtail possum. Aust. J. Zool. 2002, 50:507-519.
50. Ward A.I., White P.C.L., Smith A., Critchley C.H. Modelling the cost of roe deer browsing damage to forestry. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 191:301-310.
51. Wiggins N.L., Marsh K.J., Wallis I.R., Foley W.J., McArthur C. Sideroxylonal in Eucalyptus foliage influences foraging behaviour of an arboreal folivore. Oecologia 2006, 147:272-279.
52. Woolhouse A.D., Morgan D.R. An evaluation of repellents to suppress browsing by possums. J. Chem. Ecol. 1995, 21:1571-1583.
53. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis 1996, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.