Global sensitivity analysis of a wave propagation model for arm arteries

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1008-1016

  Leguy, C A D ^a   Bosboom, E M H ^b   Belloum, A S Z ^c   Hoeks, A P G ^b   van de Vosse, F N ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arterial stiffness; Global sensitivity analysis; Monte Carlo study; Patient specific modeling; Wave propagation model

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; WAVE PROPAGATION MODEL;

BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ARTERIAL WALL THICKENING; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD VOLUME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; WAVE PROPAGATION MODEL; YOUNG MODULUS;

ARM; ARTERIES; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VOLUME; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD;

EID: 80051820286     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Huberts W., Bosboom E., van de Vosse F. A lumped model for blood flow and pressure in the systemic arteries based on an approximate velocity profile function. Math Biosci Eng 2009, 6:27-40.
2. Lanzarone E., Liani P., Baselli G., Costantino M. Model of arterial tree and peripheral control for the study of physiological and assisted circulation. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29:542-555.
3. Liang F., Liu H. A closed-loop lumped parameter computational model for human cardiovascular system. JSME Int Ser C 2005, 48:484-493.
4. Olufsen M., Peskin C., Kim W., Pedersen E., Nadim A., Larsen J. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 2000, 28:1281-1299.
5. Avolio A. Multi-branched model of the human arterial system. Med Biol Eng Comput 1980, 18:709-718.
6. Westerhof N., Bosman F., de Vries C., Noordergraaf A. Analog studies of the human systemic arterial tree. J Biomech 1969, 2:121-143.
7. Reymond P., Merenda F., Perren F., Rüfenacht D., Stergiopulos N. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009, 297:H208-H222.
8. Bessems, D. On the propagation of pressure and flow waves through the patient specific arterial system. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2007.
9. Azer K., Peskin C. A one-dimensional model of blood flow in arteries with friction and convection based on the Womersley velocity profile. Cardiovasc Eng 2007, 7:51-73.
10. Formaggia L., Lamponi D., Tuveri M., Veneziani A. Numerical modeling of 1D arterial networks coupled with a lumped parameters description of the heart. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2006, 9:273-288.
11. Sherwin S., Franke V., Peiró J., Parker K. One-dimensional modelling of a vascular network in space-time variables. J Eng Math 2003, 47:217-250.
12. Bessems D., Giannopapa C., Rutten M., van de Vosse F. Experimental validation of a time-domain-based wave propagation model of blood flow in viscoelastic vessels. J Biomech 2008, 41:284-291.
13. Matthys K., Alastruey J., Peiró J., Khir A., Segers P., Verdonck P., et al. Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: Assessment of 1-D numerical simulations against in vitro measurements. J Biomech 2007, 40:3476-3486.
14. Leguy C., Bosboom E., Gelderblom H., Hoeks A., van de Vosse F. Estimation of distributed arterial mechanical properties using a wave propagation model in a reverse way. Med Eng Phys 2010, 32:957-967.
15. Marchandise E., Willemet M., Lacroix V. A numerical hemodynamic tool for predictive vascular surgery. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31:131-144.
16. van Riel N. Dynamic modelling and analysis of biochemical networks: mechanism-based models and model-based experiments. Brief Bioinform 2006, 7:364-374.
17. Helton J. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant. Comput Phys Commun 1999, 117:156-180.
18. Pope S., Ellwein L., Zapata C., Novak V., Kelley C., Olufsen M. Estimation and identification of parameters in a lumped cerebrovascular model. Math Biosci Eng 2009, 6:93-115.
19. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., et al. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer 2008, Wiley, West Sussex.
20. Stroev P., Hoskins P., Easson W. Distribution of wall shear rate throughout the arterial tree: a case study. Atherosclerosis 2007, 191:276-280.
21. Verbeke F., Segers P., Heireman S., Vanholder R., Verdonck P., van Bortel L. Noninvasive assessment of local pulse pressure: importance of brachial-to-radial pressure amplification. Hypertension 2005, 46:244-248.
22. Michel E., Zernikow B. Gosling's doppler pulsatility index revisited. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998, 24:597-599.
23. Bessems D., Rutten M., van de Vosse F. A wave propagation model of blood flow in large vessels using an approximate velocity profile function. J Fluid Mech 2007, 580:145-168.
24. Stergiopulos N., Segers P., Westerhof N. Use of pulse pressure method for estimating total arterial compliance in vivo. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:H424-H428.
25. Anliker M., Rockwell R., Ogden E. Nonlinear analysis of flow pulses and shock waves in arteries. Z Ang Math Phys 1971, 22:563-581.
26. Fung Y. Biomechanics: circulation 1996, Springer, Berlin.
27. Painter P., Edén P., Bengtsson H. Pulsatile blood flow, shear force, energy dissipation and Murray's law. Theor Biol Med Model 2006, 31:3-31.
28. Murray C. The physiological principle of minimum work: I. the vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1926, 12:207-214.
29. Ku Y., Kim Y., Kim J., Choi Y., Yoon S., Kim Y., et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of intima-media thickness of radial artery in pre-dialysis uraemic patients: comparison with histological examination. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006, 21:715-720.
30. Kaiser D., Mullen K., Bank A. Brachial artery elastic mechanics in patients with heart failure. Hypertension 2001, 38:1440-1445.
31. Mourad J., Girerd X., Boutouyrie P., Laurent S., Safar M., London G. Increased stiffness of radial artery wall material in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension 1997, 30:1425-1430.
32. Helton J., Davis F. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2003, 81:23-69.
33. Schenk C., Schuëller G. Uncertainty assessment of large finite element systems 2005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
34. Grim J. Multimodal discrete karhunen-Loève expansion. Kybernetika 1986, 4:329-339.
35. Loeve M. Graduate texts in mathematics 1978, vol. 46. Springer-Verlag, Ann Arbor.
36. Korkhov V., Vasyunin D., Wibisono A., Belloum A., Inda M., Roos M., et al. VLAM-G: Interactive data driven workflow engine for Grid-enabled resources. Sci Program 2007, 15:173-188.
37. Du C., Kurowicka D., Cooke R. Techniques for generic probabilistic inversion. Comput Stat Data Anal 2006, 50:1164-1187.
38. Wang G., Shan S. Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 2007, 129:370-380.
39. Helton J. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1993, 42:327-367.
40. Saltelli A., Sobol I. Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models: numerical experience. Matem Mod 1995, 7:16-28.
41. van de Vosse F., Stergiopulos N. Pulse wave propagation in the arterial tree. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2011, 43:467-499.
42. Xiu D., Sherwin S. Parametric uncertainty analysis of pulse wave propagation in a model of a human arterial network. J Comput Phys 2007, 226:1385-1407.
43. http://www.biggrid.nl/.