Inclusion of interactions in mathematical modelling of implant assisted magnetic drug targeting

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-34

  Cregg, P J ^a   Murphy, Kieran ^a   Mardinoglu, Adil ^b  

^a Ireland   (Ireland)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dipole dipole interaction; Hydrodynamic interaction; Magnetic drug targeting; Magnetic nanoparticles; Magnetizable stent magnetizable seed; Simulation

Indexed keywords

DIPOLE DIPOLE INTERACTIONS; HYDRODYNAMIC INTERACTION; MAGNETIC DRUG TARGETING; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES; MAGNETIZABLE STENT MAGNETIZABLE SEED; SIMULATION;

AGGLOMERATION; ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; CHEMOTHERAPY; DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG INTERACTIONS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; FERROMAGNETISM; FORECASTING; HYDRODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC MOMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NANOMAGNETICS; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE INTERACTIONS; SEED; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WIRE;

MAGNETIC BUBBLES;

EID: 80051816997     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.05.036     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Coffey W.T., Cregg P.J., Kalmykov Y. On the theory of Debye and Néel relaxation of single domain ferromagnetic particles. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1993, 83:263-464.
2. Cregg P.J., Crothers D.S.F., Wickstead A.W. An approximate formula for the relaxation time of a single domain ferromagnetic particle with uniaxial anisotropy and collinear field. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76:4900.
3. Cregg P.J., Bessais L. Series expansions for the magnetisation of a solid superparamagnetic system of non-interacting particles with anisotropy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 202:554-564.
4. Pankhurst Q.A., Thanh N.K.T., Jones S.K., Dobson J. Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 42:224001.
5. Berry C.C. Progress in functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 42:224003.
6. Roca A.G., Costo R., Rebolledo A.F., Veintemillas-Verdaguer S., Tartaj P., Gonzalez-Carreno T.., Morales M.P., Serna C.J. Progress in the preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 42:224002.
7. Pankhurst Q.A., Connolly J., Jones S.K., Dobson J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 36:R167-R181.
8. Berry C.C., Curtis A.S.G. Functionalisation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 36:R198-R206.
9. Berry C.C. Possible exploitation of magnetic nanoparticle-cell interaction for biomedical application. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15:543.
10. Neuberger T., Schöpf B., Hofmann H., Hofmann M., von Rechenberg B. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications: possibilities and limitations of a new drug delivery system. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:483-496.
11. Kempe H., Kempe M. The use of magnetite nanoparticles for implant-assisted magnetic drug targeting in thrombolytic therapy. Biomaterials 2010, 31:9499-9510.
12. Chomoucka J., Drbohlarova J., Huska D., Adam V., Kizek R., Hubalek J. Magnetic nanoparticles and targeted drug delivering. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62:144-149.
13. Scherer F., Anton M., Schillinger U., Henke J., Bergemann C., Krüger A., Gsbacher B., Plank C. Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo. Gene Therapy 2002, 9:102.
14. Schütt W., Grüttner C., Teller J., Westphal F., Häfeli U., Paulke B., Goetz P., Finck W. Biocompatible magnetic polymer carriers for in vivo radionuclide delivery. Artif. Organs 1999, 23:98.
15. Häfeli U. Radiolabeling of magnetic particles with rhenium-188 for cancer therapy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 225:73.
16. Jordan A., Scholz R., Maier-Hauff K., Johannsen M., Wust P., Nadobny J., Schirra H., Schmidt H., Deger S., Loening S., Lanksch W., Felix R. Presentation of a new magnetic field therapy system for the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic field hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 225:118-126.
17. Morales M.P., Bomati-Miguel O., de Alejo R.P., Ruiz-Cabello J., Veintemillas-Verdaguer S., O'Grady K. Contrast agents for MRI based on iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by laser pyrolysis. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2003, 266:102-109.
18. Shieh D., Cheng F., Su C., Yeh C., Wu M., Wu Y., Tsai C., Wu C., Chen D., Chou C. Aqueous dispersions of magnetite nanoparticles with NH+3 surfaces for magnetic manipulations of biomolecules and MRI contrast agents. Biomaterials 2005, 26:7183.
19. J.H. Leach, Magnetic Targeted Drug Delivery, MSc Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, 2003.
20. Ritter J.A., Ebner A.D., Daniel K.D., Stewart K.L. Application of high gradient magnetic separation principles to magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004, 280(2-3):184-201.
21. Gilchrist R.K. Selective inductive heating of lymph nodes. Ann. Surg. 1957, 146:596.
22. Häfeli U. Magnetically modulated therapeutic systems. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 277:19.
23. Lübbe A.S., Bergemann C., Brock J., McClure D.G. Physiological aspects in magnetic drug-targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 194:149-155.
24. Lübbe A.S., Aleciou C., Bergemann C. Clinical applications of magnetic drug targeting. J. Surg. Res. 2001, 95:200-206.
25. Lemke A.J., von Pilsach M.-I.S., Lübbe A.S., Bergemann C., Riess H., Felix R. MRI after magnetic drug targeting in patients with advanced solid malignant tumors. Eur. Radiol. 2004, 14:1949-1955.
26. Magnetics A. Adv. Mag. 2009, http://www.advancedmagnetics.com/doc/prod/combidex.htm.
27. Magforce, Magforce, 2008. http://www.magforce.de.
28. Torchilin W.P. Drug targeting. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 11:S81-S91.
29. Crommelin D.J.A., Scherphof G., Storm G. Active targeting with particulate carrier systems in the blood compartment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1995, 17:49-60.
30. Grief A.D., Richardson G. Mathematical modelling of magnetically targeted drug delivery. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:455-463.
31. Babincova M., Leszczynska D., Sourivong P., Babinec P. Lysis of photosensitized erythrocytes in an alternating magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 225:194-196.
32. Iacob G., Rotariu O., Strachan N.J.C., Häfeli U.O. Magnetizable needles and wires - modeling an efficient way to target magnetic microspheres in vivo. Biorheology 2004, 41:599-612.
33. Yellen B.B., Forbes Z.G., Halverson D.S., Fridman G., Barbee K.A., Chorny M., Levy R., Friedman G. Targeted drug delivery to magnetic implants for therapeutic applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:647-654.
34. Chen H., Ebner A.D., Kaminski M.D., Rosengart A.J., Ritter J.A. Analysis of magnetic drug carrier particle capture by a magnetizable intravascular stent: parametric study with multi-wire two-dimensional model. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:616-632.
35. Rosengart A.J., Kaminski M.D., Chen H., Caviness P.L., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. Magnetizable implants and functionalised magnetic carriers: a novel approach for non-invasive yet targeted drug delivery. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:633-638.
36. Avilés M.O., Ebner A.D., Chen H., Rosengart A.J., Kaminski M.D., Ritter J.A. Theoretical analysis of a transdermal ferromagnetic implant for retention of magnetic drug carrier particles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:605-615.
37. Avilés M.O., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. Ferromagnetic seeding for the magnetic targeting of drugs and radiation in capillary beds. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 310:131-144.
38. Avilés M.O., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. Implant assisted-magnetic drug targeting:comparison of in vitro experiments with theory. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2008, 320:2704-2713.
39. Avilés M.O., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. In vitro study of magnetic particle seeding for implanted assisted-magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2008, 320:2640-2646.
40. Avilés M.O., Ebner A.D., Mangual J.O., Ritter J.A. Isolated swine heart ventricle perfusion model for implanted assisted-magnetic drug targeting. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 361:202-208.
41. Avilés M.O., Chen H., Ebner A.D., Rosengart A.J., Kaminski M.D., Ritter J.A. In vitro study of ferromagnetic stents for implant assisted-magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 311:306-311.
42. Mangual J., Li S., Ploehn H., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. Biodegradable nanocomposite magnetite stent for implant-assisted magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322:3094-3100.
43. Mangual J., Avilés M.O., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. Biodegradable nanocomposite magnetite stent for implant-assisted magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011, 323:1903-1908.
44. Cregg P.J., Murphy K., Mardinoglu A. Calculation of nanoparticle capture efficiency in magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2008, 320:3272-3275.
45. Cregg P.J., Murphy K., Mardinoglu A. Inclusion of magnetic dipole-dipole and hydrodynamic interactions in implant assisted magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321:3893-3898.
46. Cregg P.J., Murphy K., Mardinoglu A., Prina-Mello A. Many particle magnetic dipole-dipole and hydrodynamic interactions in magnetizable stent assisted magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322:2087-2094.
47. Mardinoglu A., Cregg P.J., Murphy K., Curtin M., Prina-Mello A. Theoretical modelling of physiologically stretched vessel in magnetisable stent assisted magnetic drug targeting application. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011, 323:324-329.
48. Mikkelsen H.B.C.I., Hansen M.F. Theoretical comparison of magnetic and hydrodynamic interactions between magnetically tagged particles in microfluidic systems. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:578-583.
49. Mehasni R., Feliachi M., Latreche M. Effect of the magnetic dipole-dipole interaction on the capture efficiency in open gradient magnetic seperation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2007, 43:3488.
50. Senyei A., Widder K., Czerlinski G. Magnetic guidance of drug-carrying microspheres. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1978, 49:3578.
51. Furlani E.J., Furlani E.P. A model for predicting magnetic targeting of multifunctional particles in the microvasculature. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 312:187-193.
52. Goodwin S., Peterson C., Hoh C., Bittner C. Targeting and retention of magnetic targeted carriers (mtcs) enhancing intra-arterial chemotherapy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 194:132.
53. C.I. Mikkelsen, Magnetic Separation and Hydrodynamic interactions in Microfluidic Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Micro and NanoTechnology, Technical University of Denmark, 2005.
54. H.C. Oersted, Experiment on the effects of a current on the magnetic needle, Ann. Philos. 16.
55. A.M. Ampère, Theorie mathematique des phenomenes electrodynamiques uniquement diduite de l'experience, reprinted by Blanchard, Paris.
56. Jiles D. Introduction to Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 1991, Chapman and Hall, USA.
57. Becker R. Electromagnetic Fields and Interactions 1964, Dover Publications Inc., New York.
58. Christman J.R. Fundamentals of Solid State Physics 1988, John Wiley.
59. Savelyev I.V. Physics A General Course. Electricity and Magnetism Waves Optics 1980, MIR Publishers.
60. Aharoni A. Introduction to the Thoery of Ferromagnetism 1996, Oxford University Press.
61. Mattis D.C. The Theory of Magnetism 1. Statics and Dynamics 1981, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
62. Mattis D.C. The Theory of Magnetism Made Simple: An Introduction to Physical Concepts and to Some Useful Mathematical Concepts 2006, World Scientific Publishing.
63. Jakubovics J.P. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 1987, The Institute of Metals.
64. Brown J.W.F. Micromagnetics 1963, Interscience, New York.
65. Brown W.F. Magnetostatic Principles in Ferromagnetism 1966, Springer, New York.
66. Frenkel J., Dorfman J. Spontaneous and induced magnetization in ferromagnetic bodies. Nature 1930, 126:274.
67. Bean C.P., Livingston J.D. Superparamagnetism. J. Appl. Phys. 1959, 30:120S-129S.
68. Brown W.F. Thermal fluctuations of a single domain ferromagnetic particle. Phys. Rev. 1963, 130:1677.
69. S. Shah, Numerical simulation of particle adhesion dynamics for applications in Nanomedicine and Biosensing, Master. Thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, 2009.
70. H.G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, C. Fureby, A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques, American Institute of Physics.
71. H. Jasak, A. Jemcov, Z. Tukovic, Openfoam: A C++ library for complex physics simulations, in: International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics, IUC, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September 19th-21st.
72. OpenFOAM, 2011. URL http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/.
73. OpenFOAM, OpenFOAM: Programmer's Guide, 2011. URL http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/.
74. H. Jasak, Error Analyses and Estimation for the Finite Volume Method with Applications to Fluid Flows, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 1996.
75. A. Karac, Drop Impact of Fluid Filled Polyethylene Containers, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2003.
76. D. Brennan, The Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flows in Settling Tanks, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2001.
77. E. Villiers, The Potential of Large Eddy Simulation for the Modeling of Wall Bounded Flows, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2006.
78. F. Juretic, Error Analysis in Finite Volume CFD, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2004.
79. H. Rusche, Computational Fluid Dynamics of Dispersed Two-Phase Flows at High Phase Fractions, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2002.
80. J.K. Hutchings, On Modelling the Mass of Arctic Sea Ice, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2000.
81. L. Mangani, Development and Validation of an Object Oriented CFD Solver for Heat Transfer and Combustion Modeling in Turbomachinery Applications, Ph.D. Thesis, Universita degli studi di Firenze, Italy, 2008.
82. O. Ubbink, Numerical Prediction of Two Fluid Systems with Sharp Interfaces, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 1997.
83. P. Brajdic-Mitidieri, Advanced Modelling of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2005.
84. V. Rivola, Comparative Study of the CFD codes Mistral and OpenFOAM, Ph.D. Thesis, Hotel d'Entreprises, Parc Technologique Cap Delta 09340 Verniolle, France, 2007.
85. V. Tropsa, Predicting Residual Stresses due to Solidification in Cast Plastic Plates, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 2001.
86. H. Nilsson, W. Gyllenram, Experiences with OpenFOAM for water turbine applications, in: Proceedings of the 1st OpenFOAM International Conference, 26-27 November 2007, Beaumont House, Old Windsor, United Kingdom, 2007.
87. Simkin J., Trowbridge C.W. On the use of the total scalar potential in the numerical solution of field problems in electromagnetics. I JNME 1979, 14:432-440.
88. Shliomis M.I. Magnetic fluids. Sov. Phys. Usp. 1974, 17:153-169.
89. Bryant H.C., Sergatskov D.A., Lovato D., Adolphi N.L., Larson R.S., Flynn E.R. Magnetic needles and superparamagnetic cells. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52:4009-4025.
90. E. Allen, P. Smith, J. Henshaw, A Review of Particles Agglomeration, US Department of Energy.