Test-retest of computerized health status questionnaires frequently used in the monitoring of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized crossover trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Gudbergsen, Henrik ^a   Bartels, Else M ^a   Krusager, Peter ^a   Wæhrens, Eva E ^a   Christensen, Robin ^a,b   Danneskiold Samsøe, Bente ^a,c,d   Bliddal, Henning ^a,c,d  

^a FREDERIKSBERG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^d AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADL DISABILITY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER INPUT DEVICE; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAINDETECT QUESTIONNAIRE; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SHORT FORM 36; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80051794983     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-190     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant1. Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, Dammann KL, Dale O, Aanerud GJ, Alme TN, Uhlig T, Ann Rheum Dis 2005 64 1480 1484 10.1136/ard.2004.030437 15843456 (Pubitemid 41623861)
2. Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires1. Richter JG, Becker A, Koch T, Nixdorf M, Willers R, Monser R, Schacher B, Alten R, Specker C, Schneider M, Ann Rheum Dis 2008 67 1739 1741 10.1136/ard.2008.090209 18647853
3. Using a structured, computer-administered questionnaire for evaluating health-related quality of life in patients with chronic lower extremity wounds. Harlin SL, Harlin RD, Sherman TI, Rozsas CM, Shafqat MS, Meyers W, Ostomy Wound Manage 2009 55 30 39 19864694
4. New technology in quality of life research: are all computer-assisted approaches created equal? Litaker D, Qual Life Res 2003 12 387 393 10.1023/A:1023457927406 12797711 (Pubitemid 36609883)
5. Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: performance of touch screen questionnaires compared with semistructured psychiatric interview. Thekkumpurath P, Venkateswaran C, Kumar M, Newsham A, Bennett MI, J Pain Symptom Manage 2009 38 597 605 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.004 19692204
6. Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index1. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N, Theiler R, Ann Rheum Dis 2005 64 80 84 10.1136/ard.2003.019307 15231508 (Pubitemid 40075280)
7. Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 361. Wilson AS, Kitas GD, Carruthers DM, Reay C, Skan J, Harris S, Treharne GJ, Young SP, Bacon PA, Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002 41 268 273 10.1093/rheumatology/41.3.268 (Pubitemid 34537862)
8. Major increase in prevalence of overweight and obesity between 1987 and 2001 among Danish adults. Bendixen H, Holst C, Sorensen TI, Raben A, Bartels EM, Astrup A, Obes Res 2004 12 1464 1472 10.1038/oby.2004.183 15483211 (Pubitemid 41137453)
9. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Woolf AD, Pfleger B, Bull World Health Organ 2003 81 646 656 14710506 (Pubitemid 37254686)
10. Criteria for classification of clinical osteoarthritis. Altman RD, J Rheumatol Suppl 1991 27 10 12 2027107
11. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation of a Swedish version1. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS, Scand J Med Sci Sports 1998 8 439 448 9863983 (Pubitemid 128531478)
12. OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited1. Pham T, van der HD, Altman RD, Anderson JJ, Bellamy N, Hochberg M, Simon L, Strand V, Woodworth T, Dougados M, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004 12 389 399 10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.001 15094138 (Pubitemid 38594267)
13. SF-36 health survey update. Ware JE Jr, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25 3130 3139 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008 (Pubitemid 32042945)
14. Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. Aadahl M, Jorgensen T, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 35 1196 1202 10.1249/01.MSS.0000074446.02192.14 12840642 (Pubitemid 36807983)
15. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tolle TR, Curr Med Res Opin 2006 22 1911 1920 10.1185/030079906X132488 17022849 (Pubitemid 44663395)
16. Computer-administered bath ankylosing spondylitis and Quebec Scale outcome questionnaires for low back pain: agreement with traditional paper format. Bent H, Ratzlaff CR, Goligher EC, Kopec JA, Gillies JH, J Rheumatol 2005 32 669 672 15801023 (Pubitemid 40524699)
17. Towards an ADL Taxonomy for occupational therapists. Törnquist K, Sonn U, Scand J Occup Ther 1994 1 69 76 10.3109/11038129409106665
18. Measuring quality of occupational performance based on self-report and observation. Development and validation of instruments to evaluate ADL task performance. Wæhrens EE, Umeå, Medical Dissertations 2010
19. WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program. Linacre JM, Chicago, IL 2009 3.68.2
20. Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions. Bekkers JE, de Windt TS, Raijmakers NJ, Dhert WJ, Saris DB, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009 17 1434 1439 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.019 19454278
21. Validation and application of a subjective knee questionnaire. Hoher J, Munster A, Klein J, Eypasch E, Tiling T, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1995 3 26 33 10.1007/BF01553522 7773818
22. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP)1. Soderman P, Malchau H, Acta Orthop Scand 2000 71 39 46 10.1080/00016470052943874 10743991 (Pubitemid 30150554)
23. Measurement of pain: the psychometric properties of the Pain-O-Meter, a simple, inexpensive pain assessment tool that could change health care practices. Gaston-Johansson F, J Pain Symptom Manage 1996 12 172 181 10.1016/0885-3924(96)00128-5 8804090 (Pubitemid 26269243)
24. Effect of order of presentation of a generic and a specific health-related quality of life instrument in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a randomized study. Rat AC, Baumann C, Klein S, Loeuille D, Guillemin F, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008 16 429 435 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.011 17920302 (Pubitemid 351426267)
25. Measuring physical activity in field studies: Comparison of a questionnaire, 24-hour recall and an accelerometer. Kwak L, Eur J Sports Sci 2007 7 193 201 10.1080/17461390701674088
26. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009 467 958 965 10.1007/s11999-008-0358-5 18587624
27. Older adults' pain communication: the effect of interruption. McDonald DD, Fedo J, Pain Manag Nurs 2009 10 149 153 10.1016/j.pmn.2009.03.003 19706352
28. A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire. Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, Bonomi A, Schoenfeld P, Med Care 2001 39 181 189 10.1097/00005650-200102000-00008 11176555 (Pubitemid 33603627)
29. Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Greenwood MC, Hakim AJ, Carson E, Doyle DV, Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006 45 66 71 10.1093/rheumatology/kei100 (Pubitemid 43033877)
30. Electronic pain questionnaires: a randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment. Cook AJ, Roberts DA, Henderson MD, Van Winkle LC, Chastain DC, Hamill-Ruth RJ, Pain 2004 110 310 317 10.1016/j.pain.2004.04.012 15275781 (Pubitemid 38953296)
31. An open-source, self-explanatory touch screen in routine care. Validity of filling in the Bath measures on Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Function Index, the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scales in comparison with paper versions. Schefte DB, Hetland ML, Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010 49 99 104 10.1093/rheumatology/kep333
32. Hypopituitary patients prefer a touch-screen to paper quality of life questionnaire. Goodhart IM, Ibbotson V, Doane A, Roberts B, Campbell MJ, Ross RJ, Growth Horm IGF Res 2005 15 384 387 10.1016/j.ghir.2005.08.002 16183313 (Pubitemid 41683805)
33. Touch-screen versus paper-and-pen questionnaires: effects on patients' evaluations of quality of care. Larsson BW, Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 2006 19 328 338 16961098 (Pubitemid 43992788)
34. DANBIO - powerful research database and electronic patient record. Hetland ML, Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011 50 69 77 10.1093/rheumatology/keq309