Long-term subjective and functional evaluation after thumb replantation with special attention to the quick DASH questionnaire and a specially designed trauma score called modified mayo score

Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 460-466

  Haas, Franz ^a   Hubmer, Martin ^a   Rappl, Thomas ^a   Koch, Horst ^a   Parvizi, Irene ^a   Parvizi, Daryousch ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Amputation; DASH; Replantation; Thumb

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FINGER AMPUTATION; FINGER REPLANTATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; MALE; MODIFIED MAYO SCORE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUICK DASH QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSIBILITY; THUMB; WORK RESUMPTION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AMPUTATION, TRAUMATIC; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPLANTATION; THUMB; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80051792735     PISSN: 00225282     EISSN: 15298809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e997fc     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Carrel A, Guthrie C. Complete amputation of the thigh with replantation. Am J Med Sci. 1906;131:297-301.
2. Eiken O, Nabseth DC, Mayer RF, Deterling RA Jr. Limb replantation. II. The pathophysiological effects. Arch Surg. 1964;88:54-65.
3. Gillies H, Reid DA. Autograft of the amputated digit. Br J Plast Surg. 1955;7:338-342.
4. Lapchinsky AG. Recent results of experimental transplantation of presereved limbs and kidneys and possible use of this technique in clinical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960;87:539-571.
5. Malt RA, McKhann C. Replantation of severd arms. JAMA. 1964;189:716-722.
6. Chiu HJ, Lu SY, Lin TW, Chen MT. Transpositional digital replantation. J Trauma. 1985;23:440-443.
7. Urbaniak JR. Replantation. In: Green DP, ed. Operative Hand Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1982:811.
8. Urbaniak JR. Thumb reconstruction by microsurgery. Instr Course Lect. 1984;33:425-446.
9. Tamai S. Current status of orthopaedic microsurgery in Japan. Personal experience and review of the literature. Clin Orthop. 1984;184:24-33. (Pubitemid 14128167)
10. Biemer E. Definitions and classifications in replantation surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1980;33:164-168. (Pubitemid 10038118)
11. Unglaub F, Demir E, Von Reim R, Van Schoonhoven J, Hahn P. Long-term functional and subjective results of thumb replantation. Microsurgery. 2006;28:552-556. (Pubitemid 44904403)
12. Dabernig J, Hart AM, Schwabegger AH, Dabernig W, Harpf C. Evaluation outcome of replanted digits using the DASH score: review of 38 patients. Int J Surg. 2006;4:30-36.
13. Germann G, Wind G, Harth A. der DASH Fragebogen. Ein neues instrument zur Beurteilung von Behandlungsergebnissen an der oberen Extr. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999;31:33-40.
14. Strickland J, Keller RB. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand. Outcome data collection package Version 1.0 of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Council of Musculoskeletal Speciality Societies, Institute for Work and Health (Toronto), American Association for Hand surgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Arthroscopy Association of North America, American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Rosement, IL; J Orthop Res. 1996;14:171-172.
15. Lamey DM, Fernandez DL. Results of the modified Sauve-Kapandji procedure in the treatment of chronic posttraumatic derangement of the distal radioulnar joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1758-1769. (Pubitemid 29013808)
16. Dellon AL. Sensory recovery in replanted digits and transplanted toes: A review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1986;2:123-129.
17. Gelberman RH, Urbaniak JR, Bright DS, Levin LS. Digital sensibility following replantation. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1978;3:313-319. (Pubitemid 9230942)
18. Janezic TF, Arnez ZM, Solinc M, Zaletel-Kragelj L. One hundred sixty seven thumb replantations and revascularizations: early microvascular results. Microsurgery. 1996;17:259-263.
19. Preisser P, Partecke BD. [Comparison of functional results after reconstruction of the thumb]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2003;35:3-11 (in German). (Pubitemid 37086879)
20. Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, Germann G, Sauerbier M. [Does the disability of shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire (DASH) replace grip strength and range of motion in outcome-evaluation?] Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005;37:126-130 (in German). (Pubitemid 40826688)
21. Kalb K, Ludwig A, Tauscher A, Landsleitner B, Wiemer P, Krimmer H. [Treatment outcome after surgical arthrodesis]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999;31:253-259 (in German).
22. Zimmermann R, Sailer R, Pechlaner S, Gabl M. Functional outcome with special attention to the DASH questionnaire following callus distraction and phalangisation of the thumb after traumatic amputation in the middle one-third. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:521-526. (Pubitemid 38008351)