Impact of multiorgan fusion imaging and interactive 3-dimensional visualization for intraventricular neuroendoscopic surgery

Neurosurgery

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Kin, Taichi ^a   Shin, Masahiro ^a   Oyama, Hiroshi ^b   Kamada, Kyousuke ^a   Kunimatsu, Akira ^a   Momose, Toshimitsu ^a   Saito, Nobuhito ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cerebral ventricle; Hybrid rendering method; Multimodal individualizing tissue threshold method; Mutual information method; Virtual endoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY; ARACHNOID CYST; ARTICLE; BASILAR ARTERY; BRAIN AQUEDUCT STENOSIS; BRAIN BIOPSY; BRAIN FORNIX; BRAIN INTERVENTRICULAR FORAMEN; BRAIN VEIN; CHILD; CHOROID PLEXUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLLOID CYST; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EPENDYMOMA; FEMALE; GALEN VEIN; GERM CELL TUMOR; HUMAN; HYDROCEPHALUS; INFANT; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; LATERAL BRAIN VENTRICLE; LYMPHOMA; MALE; MAMMILLARY BODY; MEDULLOBLASTOMA; NEUROENDOSCOPY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTIC CHIASM; ORGANUM VASCULOSUM OF THE LAMINA TERMINALIS; PITUITARY STALK; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREPONTINE CISTERN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SELLA TURCICA; SEPTUM PELLUCIDUM; SIMULATION; SKIN; SKULL; SPHENOID SINUS; SURGICAL RISK; TECTUM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUBER CINEREUM; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROENDOSCOPY;

EID: 80051790167     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318211019a     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Riegel T, Hellwig D, Bauer BL, Mennel HD. Endoscopic anatomy of the third ventricle. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1994;61:54-56.
2. Auer LM, Auer DP. Virtual endoscopy for planning and simulation of minimally invasive neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(3):529-537. (Pubitemid 28400124)
3. Rohde V, Krombach GA, Struffert T, Gilsbach JM. Virtual MRI endoscopy: Detection of anomalies of the ventricular anatomy and its possible role as a presurgical planning tool for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143(11):1085-1091. (Pubitemid 33078436)
4. Wada J, Nakajima N, Miki T, Ito H. Periventricular anatomy viewed from inside the ventricles. Proc Surg Anat Microneurosurg. 2000;(12):44-53.
5. Kin T, Oyama H, Kamada K, Aoki S, Ohtomo K, Saito N. Prediction of surgical view of neurovascular decompression using interactive computer graphics. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(1):121-129.
6. Nakajima N,Wada J, Miki T, Haraoka J, Hata N. Surface rendering-based virtual intraventricular endoscopy: Retrospective feasibility study and comparison to volume rendering-based approach. Neuroimage. 2007;37(suppl 1):S89-S99. (Pubitemid 47239430)
7. Wolfsberger S, Neubauer A, Buhler K, et al. Advanced virtual endoscopy for endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(5):1001-1009. (Pubitemid 44852067)
8. Prassopoulos P, Raptopoulos V, Chuttani R, McKee JD, McNicholas MM, Sheiman RG. Development of virtual CT cholangiopancreatoscopy. Radiology. 1998;209(2):570-574. (Pubitemid 28503132)
9. Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ. Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol. 2001;46(3):R1-R45. (Pubitemid 32218849)
10. Pluim JP, Fitzpatrick JM. Image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(11):1341-1343.
11. Beyer J, Hadwiger M, Wolfsberger S, Buhler K. High-quality multimodal volume rendering for preoperative planning of neurosurgical interventions. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2007;13(6):1696-1703. (Pubitemid 350076650)
12. Schulze F, Buhler K, Neubauer A, Kanitsar A, Holton L, Wolfsberger S. Intraoperative virtual endoscopy for image guided endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5(2):143-154.
13. Serra L, Kockro RA, Guan CG, et al. Multimodal volume-based tumor neurosurgery planning in the Virtual Workbench. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 1998;1496:1007-1015. (Pubitemid 128152750)
14. Mori K,Suenaga Y,Toriwaki J., Fast volume rendering based on software optimization using multimedia instructions PC platform. Proc Comput Assisted Radiol Surg. 2002:782-787.
15. Tietjen C, Isenberg T, Preim B. Combining silhouettes, surface, and volume rendering for surgery education and planning. Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization (EUROVIS 2005). 2005:303-310.
16. Kim KH,Kwon MJ,Kwon SM,Ra JB,Park H., Fast surface and volume rendering based on shear-warp factorization for a surgical simulator. Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7(5):268-278. (Pubitemid 36182801)
17. Shimizu S, Suzuki H, Maki H, et al. A novel image fusion visualizes the angioarchitecture of the perforating arteries in the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(10):2011-2014. (Pubitemid 37444853)
18. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, Hamatake S, Honda S, Takahashi M. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(9):1545-1552. (Pubitemid 35154996)
19. Hiratsuka Y, Miki H, Kiriyama I, et al. Diagnosis of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: 3T MR angiography versus 64-channel multi-detector row CT angiography. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(4):169-178.
20. Nael K, Villablanca JP, Saleh R, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: A comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(10):2118-2121. (Pubitemid 44788641)