Simulation to assess the safety of new healthcare teams and new facilities

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 125-133

  Geis, Gary L ^a   Pio, Brian ^a   Pendergrass, Tiffany L ^a   Moyer, Michael R ^a   Patterson, Mary D ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Emergency; Safety; Simulation; Teamwork; Workload

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKLOAD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 80051785489     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31820dff30     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
2. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Adams S, Pandey V, Darzi A. A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre. Ann Surg 2005;242:631-639. (Pubitemid 41567116)
3. Kobayashi L, Shapiro MJ, Sucov A, et al. Portable advanced medical simulation for new emergency department testing and orientation. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:691-695. (Pubitemid 43744549)
4. Alfredsdottir H, Bjornsdottir K. Nursing and patient safety in the operating room. J Adv Nurs 2008;61:29-37.
5. Nunnink L, Welsh AM, Abbey M, Buschel C. In situ simulation-based team training for post-cardiac surgical emergency chest reopen in the intensive care unit. Aneasth Intensive Care 2009;37:74-78.
6. Blike GT, Christoffersen K, Cravero JP, Andeweg SK, Jensen J. A method for measuring system safety and latent errors associated with pediatric procedural sedation. Anesth Analg 2005;101:48-58. (Pubitemid 40853349)
7. Villamaria FJ, Pliego JF, Wehbe-Janek H, et al. Using simulation to orient code blue team to a new hospital facility. Simul Healthc 2008;3: 209-216.
8. Rodriguez-Paz JM, Mark LJ, Herzer KR, et al. A novel process for introducing a new intraoperative program: a multidisciplinary paradigm for mitigating hazards and improving patient safety. Anesth Analg 2009;108:202-210.
9. Wachter RM, Shojania KG. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:520.
10. Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005;116:1506-1512. (Pubitemid 46056501)
11. Hart SG, Straveland LE. Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of the experimental and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, eds. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1988:139-183.
12. Cao A, Chintamani KK, Pandya AK, Ellis RD. NASA TLX: software for assessing mental workload. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:113-117.
13. Becker AB, Warm JS, Dember WN, Hancock PA. Effects of jet engine noise and performance feedback on perceived workload in a monitoring task. Int J Aviat Psychol 1995;5:49-62.
14. Weinger MB, Reddy SB, Slagle JM. Multiple measures of anesthesia workload during teaching and nonteaching cases. Anesth Analg 2004; 98:1419-1425. (Pubitemid 38525602)
15. Gregg A. Relationship among subjective mental workload, experience, and education of cardiovascular critical care register nurses. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama at Birmingham; 1993:178.
16. Malec JF, Torsher LC, Dunn WF, et al. The mayo high performance teamwork scale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills. Simul Healthc 2007;2:4-10. (Pubitemid 47181448)
17. Byers JC, Bittner AC, Hill SG. Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: are paired comparisons necessary? In: Mitral A, ed. Advances in Industrial Ergonomics &Safety. London: Taylor &Francis; 1989:481-485.
18. Eggemeier FT. Properties of workload assessment techniques. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, eds. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1988:41-62.
19. Helmreich RL, Wilhelm JA, Klinect JR, Merritt AC. Culture, error, and crew resource management. In: Salas E, Bowers CA, Edens E, eds. Improving Teamwork in Organizations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001: 305-331.
20. Reason J. Human Error. New York, NY: Cambridge University; 1990.
21. Grasha AF, Reilley S, Schell KL, Tranum D, Filburn J. Process and Delayed Verification Errors in Community Pharmacy: Implications for Improving Accuracy and Patient Safety. Technical Report 112101. Cincinnati, OH: Cognitive-Systems Performance Laboratory; 2001.