Pre-classification and post-classification change-detection techniques to monitor land-cover and land-use change using multi-temporal Landsat imagery: A case study on Pisa Province in Italy

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 32, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 4365-4381

  Peiman, Reihaneh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORESTATION; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; URBAN GROWTH;

ARTIFICIAL STRUCTURES; BUILT-UP STRUCTURES; CHANGE DETECTION ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION APPROACH; CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; ENHANCED THEMATIC MAPPERS; POST CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

DEFORESTATION; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MAP; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

ITALY; PISA [TUSCANY]; TUSCANY;

EID: 80051778483     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2010.486806     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cakir, H.I., Khorram, S. and Nelson, S.A., 2006, Correspondence analysis for detecting land cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102, pp. 306-317.
2. Congalton, R.G. and Green, K. (Eds.), 1999, Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices (Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers).
3. Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B. and Lambin, E., 2004, Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, pp. 1565-1596.
4. Coppin, P.L. and Bauer, M.E., 1996, Change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing digital imagery. Remote Sensing Reviews, 13, pp. 207-234.
5. Fung, L. and Ledrew, E., 1987, Application of principal component analysis to change detection. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53, pp. 1649-1658.
6. Hasse, J.E. and Lathrop, R.G., 2003, Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Applied Geography, 23, pp. 159-175.
7. Holben, B.N. and Justice, C.O., 1980, The topographic effects on spectral response from nadirpoint sensors. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46, pp. 1191-1200.
8. Howarth, P.J. and Boasson, E., 1983, Landsat digital enhancements for change detection in urban environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 13, pp. 149-160.
9. Jensen, J.R. (Ed.), 2005, Introductory to Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).
10. Lodwick, G.D., 1979, Measuring ecological changes in multitemporal Landsat TM data using principal components. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 1131-1141 (Ann Arbor, MI: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan).
11. Lunetta, R.S., 1998, Applications, project formulation, and analytical approach. In Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications, R.S. Lunetta and C.D. Elvidge (Eds.), pp. 1-19 (Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Press).
12. Mas, J.F., 1999, Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, pp. 139-152.
13. Puyravaud, J.P., 2003, Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 177, pp. 593-596.
14. Ridd, M.K. and Liu, J.J., 1998, A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 63, pp. 95-100.
15. Singh, A., 1986, Change detection in the tropical forest environment of northeastern India using Landsat. In Remote Sensing and Land Management, M.J. Eden and J.T. Parry (Eds.), pp. 237-254 (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons).
16. Singh, A., 1989, Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10, pp. 989-1003.
17. Singh, A. Andharrison, A., 1985, Standardized principal components. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6, pp. 883-896.
18. Smith, J.A., Tzeu, L.L. and Ranson, K.J., 1980, The Lambertian assumption and Landsat data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46, pp. 1183-1189.
19. Tortora, R., 1978, A note on sample size estimation for multinomial populations. The American Statistician, 32, pp. 100-102.
20. Townshend, J.R.G., Goff, T.E. and Tucker, C.J., 1985, Multispectral dimensionality of images of normalized difference vegetation index at continental scales. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 23, pp. 888-895.
21. Turner, B.L., Skole, D., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L. and Leemans, R., 1995, Land use and land cover change. Science/Research Plan. IGBP Report 35/HDP Report 7. Stockholm: International Geosphere-Biosphere Program.
22. William, E.R., William, B.M. and Turner, B.L., 1994, Modeling land use and land cover as part of global environmental change. Climatic Change, 28, pp. 45-64.
23. Yuan, D., Elvidge, C.D. and Lunetta, R.S., 1998, Survey of multispectral methods for land cover change analysis. In Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications, R.S. Lunetta and C.D. Elvidge (Eds.), pp. 21-39 (Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Press).
24. Yuan, F., Sawaya, K.E., Loeffelholz, B. and Bauer, M.E., 2005, Land cover area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98, pp. 317-328.