What does it mean to 'live' and 'die'? A cross-linguistic analysis of parent-child conversations in English and Indonesian

British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 375-395

  Leddon, Erin M ^a   Waxman, Sandra R ^a   Medin, Douglas L ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEATH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDONESIA; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LIFE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DEATH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDONESIA; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LIFE; MALE; MOTHER-CHILD RELATIONS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 80051768851     PISSN: 0261510X     EISSN: 2044835X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/026151010X490858     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Akhtar, N., Jipson, J., & Callanan, M. (2001). Learning words through overhearing. Child Development, 72, 416-430. doi:.
2. Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2008). Naming practices and the acquisition of key biological concepts: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Psychological Science, 19(4)314-319. doi:.
3. Astuti, R., Solomon, G. E. A., & Carey, S. (2004). Constraints on conceptual development: A case study of the acquisition of folkbiological and folksociological knowledge in Madagascar. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(277), 1-135.
4. Atran, S. & Medin, D. L. (2008). The native mind and the cultural construction of nature. Boston, MA MIT Press.
5. Atran, S., Medin, D. L., Lynch, E., Vapnarsky, V., Ucan Ek', E., & Sousa, P. (2001). Folkbiology doesn't come from folkpsychology: Evidence from Yukatek Maya in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1, 3-42.
6. Bang, M., Medin, D., & Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 13868-13874. doi:.
7. Beals, D. E. (1993). Explanatory talk in low-income families' mealtime conversations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 489-513. doi:.
8. Berthenthal, B. I. (1993). Infants' perception of biomechanical motions: Intrinsic image and knowledge-based constraints. In C. Granrud (Eds.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy. Carnegie Mellon Symposia on Cognition (pp. 175) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
9. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
10. Callanan, M., & Sabbagh, M. (2004). Multiple labels for objects in conversations with young children: Parents' language and children's developing expectations about word meanings. Developmental Psychology, 40, 746-763. doi:.
11. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA Bradford Books.
12. Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. V. (1980). Development of face recognition: A maturational component?. Developmental Psychology, 16, 257-269. doi:.
13. Clark, E. V. (1982). The young word maker: A case study of innovation in the child's lexicon. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 390-425). Cambridge, MA Cambridge University Press.
14. Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition, 64, 1-37. doi:.
15. Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12, 258-261. doi:.
16. Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79-106. doi:.
17. Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. Premack (Eds.), Causality and culture (pp. 150-184). Oxford Plenum Press.
18. Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(1) Serial No. 256, 1-148.
19. Gelman, S. A., & Gottfried, G. M. (1996). Children's causal explanations for animate and inanimate motion. Child Development, 67, 1970-1987. doi:.
20. Gil, D., & Tadmor, U. (2007). The MPI-EVA Jakarta Child Language Database. A joint project of the Department of Linguistics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and the Center for Language and Culture Studies, Atma Jaya Catholic University.
21. Godfrey, J. J., & Holliman, E. (1997). SWITCHBOARD-1 transcripts. Philadelphia, PA Linguistic Data Consortium.
22. Goss, A. E. (1961). Verbal mediating responses and concept formation. Psychological Review, 68, 248-274. doi:.
23. Harris, P. L. (2006). It's probably good to talk. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 158-164. doi:.
24. Harris, P. L., & Koenig, M. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77, 505-524. doi:.
25. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1999). A developmental perspective on informal biology. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 321-354). Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
26. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1994). Young children's naïve theory of biology. Cognition, 50, 171-188. doi:.
27. Hatano, G., Siegler, R. S., Richards, D. D., Inagaki, K., Stavy, R., & Wax, N. (1993). The development of biological knowledge: A multi-national study. Cognitive Development, 8, 47-62. doi:.
28. Inagaki, K. (1990). The effects of raising animals on children's biological knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 119-129.
29. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1993). Young children's understanding of the mind-body distinction. Child Development, 64, 1534-1549. doi:.
30. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1996). Young children's recognition of commonalities between animals and plants. Child Development, 67, 2823-2840. doi:.
31. Jipson, J., & Callanan, M. (2003). Mother-child conversation and children's understanding of biological and non-biological changes in size. Child Development, 74, 629-644. doi:.
32. Johnson, S. C. (2000). The recognition of mentalistic agents in infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 22-28. doi:.
33. Johnson, S. C., Slaughter, V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? Features that elicit gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1, 233-238. doi:.
34. Klingberg, G. (1952). The distinction between living and not living among 7-10-year-old children, with some remarks concerning the so-called animism controversy. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 90, 227-238.
35. Klingensmith, S. W. (1953). Child animism: What the child means by alive. Child Development, 24, 51-61. doi:.
36. Kuczaj, S. (1976). -ing, -s and -ed: A study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
37. Laurendeau, M., & Pinard, A. (1962). Causal thinking in the child. New York International Universities Press.
38. Leddon, E. M., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2008). Unmasking 'alive': Children's appreciation of a concept linking all living things. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9, 461-473. doi:.
39. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
40. Markman, E. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14, 57-77. doi:.
41. McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., Chow, B. W.-Y., & Shu, H. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415-435.
42. Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2009). Cultural processes and psychological distance. Paper presented at the AHRC Conference, 'Culture and the Mind: Folk Psychology, Folk Epistemology and Cultural Transmission' Sheffield, UK, September 11-13, 2009.
43. Medin, D. L., Ross, N., Atran, S., Cox, D., Coley, J., Proffitt, J., & Blok, S. (2006). Folkbiology of freshwater fish. Cognition, 99(3), 237-273. doi:.
44. Medin, D. L., & Waxman, S. R. (2007). Interpreting asymmetries of projection in children's inductive reasoning. In A. Feeney & E. Heit (Eds.), Inductive reasoning (pp. 55-80). New York Cambridge University Press.
45. Merriman, W. E., & Bowman, L. L. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 54(3-4) Serial No. 220, 220.
46. Nguyen, S., & Gelman, S. (2002). Four- and 6-year-olds' biological concept of death. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 495-513. doi:.
47. Nguyen, S., & Rosengren, K. S. (2004). Parental reports of children's biological experiences and misconceptions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 411-420. doi:.
48. Opfer, J. E. (2002). Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: The case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change. Cognition, 86, 97-122. doi:.
49. Opfer, J. E., & Gelman, S. A. (2001). Children's and adult's models for predicting teleological action: The development of a biology-based model. Child Development, 72, 1367-1381. doi:.
50. Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting the living things concept: A microgenetic study of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 301-332. doi:.
51. Piaget, J. (1929). The child's conception of the world (J. and A. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York Harcourt Brace.
52. Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2004). Are dinosaurs the rule or the exception? Developing concepts of death and extinction. Cognitive Development, 19, 363-383. doi:.
53. Poulin-Dubois, D. (1999). Infants' distinction between animate and inanimate objects: The origins of naïve psychology. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 257-280). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
54. Poulin-Dubois, D., & Shultz, T. R. (1990). The infant's concept of agency: The distinction between social and nonsocial objects. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151, 77-90.
55. Proffitt, J. B., Coley, J. D., & Medin, D. L. (2000). Expertise and category-based induction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 811-828.
56. Richards, D. D., & Siegler, R. S. (1984). The effects of task requirements on children's life judgments. Child Development, 55, 1687-1696. doi:.
57. Ross, N., Medin, D. L., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 25-47. doi:.
58. Rossman, I. L., & Goss, A. E. (1951). The acquired distinctiveness of cues: The role of discriminative verbal responses in facilitating the acquisition of discriminative motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 173-182. doi:.
59. Russell, R. W., & Dennis, W. (1939). Studies in animism: I. A standardized procedure for the investigation of animism. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 55, 389-400.
60. Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced reference in parent-child discourse. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children's language, Vol. 4, 1-28). Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
61. Slaughter, V., Jaakkola, R., & Carey, S. (1999). Constructing a coherent theory: Children's biological understanding of life and death. In M. Siegal & C. Peterson (Eds.), Children's understanding of biology and health (pp. 71-98). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
62. Slaughter, V., & Lyons, M. (2003). Learning about life and death in early childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 1-30. doi:.
63. Snow, C. E., & Kurland, B. F. (1996). Sticking to the point: Talk about magnets as a preparation for literacy. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Child discourse and social learning. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 189-220). New York Cambridge University Press.
64. Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L. (1995). Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, A. J. Premack & D. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44-77). Oxford Clarendon.
65. Springer, K., & Keil, F. (1989). On the development of biologically specific beliefs: The case of inheritance. Child Development, 60, 637-648. doi:.
66. Springer, K., & Keil, F. (1991). Early differentiation of causal mechanisms appropriate to biological and nonbiological kinds. Child Development, 62, 767-781. doi:.
67. Stavy, R., & Wax, N. (1989). Children's conceptions of plants as living things. Human Development, 32, 88-94. doi:.
68. Tarlowski, A. (2006). If it's an animal it has axons: Experience and culture in preschool children's reasoning about animates. Cognitive Development, 21, 249-265. doi:.
69. Thompson, R. A. (2006). Conversation and developing understanding: Introduction to the special issue. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 1-16. doi:.
70. Waxman, S. R. (2005). Why is the concept living thing so elusive? Concepts, languages, and the development of folkbiology. In W. Ahn, R. L Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B Markman & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 49-67). Washington, DC American Psychological Association.
71. Waxman, S. R., & Lidz, J. L. (2006). Early word learning. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.) (Vol. 2, pp. 299-335). Hoboken, NJ Wiley.
72. Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2006). Core knowledge, naming and the acquisition of the fundamental (folk)biologic concept 'alive'. In: N. Miyake (Ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 53-55). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
73. Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2007). Experience and cultural models matter: Placing firm limits on anthropocentrism. Human Development, 50, 23-30. doi:.
74. Waxman, S. R., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: Early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 294-308. doi:.
75. Woodward, A. L. (1999). Infants' ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 145-160. doi:.
76. Woodward, A. L., Sommerville, J. A., & Guajardo, J. J. (2001). How infants make sense of intentional action. In B. F. Malle & L. J. Moses (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations in social cognition (pp. 149-169). Cambridge, MA MIT Press.