The gravity model

Annual Review of Economics

Volumn 3, Issue , 2011, Pages 133-160

  Anderson, James E ^a,b  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Incidence; Migration; Multilateral resistance; Trade costs

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051757175     PISSN: 19411383     EISSN: 19411391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125114     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Anderson JE. 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am. Econ. Rev. 69:106-16
2. Anderson JE, Neary JP. 2005.Measuring the Restrictiveness of International Trade Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press
3. Anderson JE, van Wincoop E. 2003. Gravity with gravitas. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:170-92
4. Anderson JE, van Wincoop E. 2004. Trade costs. J. Econ. Lit. 42:691-751 (Pubitemid 39525566)
5. Anderson JE, Yotov YV. 2010a. The changing incidence of geography. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:2157-86
6. Anderson JE, Yotov YV. 2010b. Specialization: pro- and anti-globalizing, 1990-2002. NBER Work. Pap. 16301
7. Arkolakis C. 2008. Market penetration costs and the new consumers margin in international trade. NBER Work. Pap. 14214
8. Baier SL, Bergstrand JH. 2001. The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity. J. Int. Econ. 53(1):1-27 (Pubitemid 32093527)
9. Baier SL, Bergstrand JH. 2009. Bonus vetus OLS: a simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. J. Int. Econ. 77(1):77:77-85
10. Beine M, Docquier F, Ozden C. 2009. Diasporas. Policy Res. Work. Pap. 4984, World Bank, Washington, DC
11. Bergstrand JH. 1985. The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev. Econ. Stat. 67(3):474-81
12. Bergstrand JH. 1989. The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Rev. Econ. Stat. 71(1):143-53
13. Bergstrand JH, Egger P. 2007. A knowledge- and physical-capital model of international trade flows, foreign direct investment and multinational enterprises. J. Int. Econ. 73:278-308 (Pubitemid 350028456)
14. Bergstrand JH, Egger P. 2011. Gravity equations and economic frictions in the world economy. In Palgrave Handbook of International Trade, ed. D Bernhofen, R Falvey, D Greenaway, U Krieckemeier. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. In press
15. Chaney T. 2008. Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:1707-21
16. Costinot A, Donaldson D, Komunjer I. 2010. What goods do countries trade? A quantitative exploration of Ricardo's ideas. Work. Pap., MIT
17. Deardorff A. 1980. The general validity of the law of comparative advantage. J. Polit. Econ. 88:941-57
18. Eaton J, Kortum S. 2002. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70:1741-79
19. Feenstra R. 2004. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
20. Grogger J, Hanson GH. 2008. Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants. NBER Work. Pap. 13821
21. Head K, Mayer T, Ries J. 2009. How remote is the off-shoring threat? Eur. Econ. Rev. 53:429-44
22. Head K, Ries J. 2008. FDI as an outcome of the market for corporate control: theory and evidence. J. Int. Econ. 74:2-20 (Pubitemid 350286905)
23. Helpman E, Melitz MJ, Rubinstein Y. 2008. Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Q. J. Econ. 123:441-87
24. Helpman E, Melitz MJ, Yeaple SR. 2004. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:300-16 (Pubitemid 38671025)
25. Keller W, Yeaple SR. 2009. Gravity in the weightless economy. NBER Work. Pap. 15509
26. Kleinert J, Toubal F. 2010. Gravity for FDI. Rev. Int. Econ. 18(1):1-13
27. Leamer EE, Levinsohn J. 1995. International trade theory: the evidence. In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3, ed. GM Grossman, K Rogoff, pp. 1339-94. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. B.V.
28. Leamer EE, Stern RM. 1970. Quantitative International Economics. Chicago: Aldine
29. Martin W, Pham CS. 2008. Estimating the gravity equation when zero trade flows are frequent. MPRA Pap. 9453, Univ. Libr. Munich, Ger.
30. Martin P, Rey H. 2004. Financial super-markets: Size matters for asset trade. J. Int. Econ. 64:335-61 (Pubitemid 40553561)
31. Matsuyama K. 2007. Beyond icebergs: towards a theory of biased globalization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 74:237-53 (Pubitemid 46040517)
32. McCallum J. 1995. National borders matter: Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns. Am. Econ. Rev. 85(3):615-23
33. McFadden D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers of Econometrics, ed. P Zarembka, pp. 105-42. New York: Academic
34. Novy D. 2010. International trade and monopolistic competition without CES: estimating translog gravity. Unpublished manuscript, Warwick Univ.
35. Portes R, Rey H. 2005. The determinants of cross-border equity flows. J. Int. Econ. 65:269-96 (Pubitemid 40318204)
36. Ravenstein EG. 1889. The laws of migration. J. R. Stat. Soc. 52(2):241-305
37. Redding S, Venables AJ. 2004. Economic geography and international inequality. J. Int. Econ. 62(1):53-82 (Pubitemid 38025169)
38. Samuelson PA. 1952. The transfer problem and transport costs: the terms of trade when impediments are absent. Econ. J. 62:278-304
39. Santos Silva J, Tenreyro S. 2006. The log of gravity. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88(4):641-58 (Pubitemid 44728714)
40. Savage IR, Deutsch KW. 1960. A statistical model of the gross analysis of transactions flows. Econometrica 28:551-72
41. Tinbergen J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth-Century Fund