Assessing the impact of canopy structure simplification in common multilayer models on irradiance absorption estimates of measured and virtually created Fagus sylvatica (L.) stands

Remote Sensing

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1009-1027

  Biliouris, Dimitrios ^a   Van der Zande, Dimitry ^a   Verstraeten, Willem W ^a   Muys, Bart ^a   Coppin, Pol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

AMAP model; Canopy representation; Fagus sylvatica L; Irradiance absorption; PBRT ray tracing; Tree architecture

Indexed keywords

AMAP MODEL; CANOPY REPRESENTATION; FAGUS SYLVATICA L; IRRADIANCE ABSORPTION; PBRT RAY TRACING; TREE ARCHITECTURE;

ABSORPTION; ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION; FORESTRY; MULTILAYERS; PLANT EXTRACTS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ABSORPTION; EXTRACTIVES; FAGUS SYLVATICA; FOREST CANOPY; FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTILAYERS; PLANTS; TREES;

EID: 80051742897     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs1041009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brunner, A. A light model for spatially explicit forest stand models. Ecology Man. 1998, 107, 19-46.
2. Le Roux, X.; Sinoquet, H.; Vandame, M. Spatial distribution of leaf dry weight per area and leaf nitrogen concentration in relation to local radiation regime within an isolated tree crown. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19, 181-188.
3. 2 assimilation rate by internal resistances to CO2 transfer in the leaves of 2 tree species (Fagus-sylvatica L. and Castanea-sativa mill). Plant Cell Env. 1995, 18, 43-51.
4. 2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant Cell Env. 1999, 22, 1475-1495.
5. Röhrig, M.; Stützel, H.; Alt, C. A three-dimensional approach to modeling light interception in heterogeneous canopies. Agron. J. 1999, 91, 1024-1032.
6. Boonen, C.; Samson, R.; Janssens, K.; Pien, H.; Lemeur, R.; Berckmans, D. Scaling the spatial distribution of photosynthesis from leaf to canopy in a plant growth chamber. Ecol. Model. 2002, 156, 201-212.
7. Dufrêne, E.; Davi, H.; François, C.; Le Maire, G.; Le Dantec, V.; Granier, A. Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest Part I: Model description and uncertainty analysis on modelled NEE. Ecol. Model. 2005, 185, 407-436.
8. Amthor, J.S.; Goulden, M.L.; Munger, J.W.; Wofsy, S.C. Testing a mechanistic model of forest-canopy mass and energy exchange using eddy correlation: carbon dioxide and ozone uptake by a mixed oak--maple stand. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 1994, 21, 623-651.
9. Bonan, G.B. A land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: Technical description and user's guide; NCAR Tech.: Boulder, CO, USA, 1996; p. 150.
10. Dickinson, R.E.; Shaikh, M.; Bryant, R.; Graumlich, L. Interactive canopies for a climate model. J. Climate 1998, 11, 2823-2836.
11. Monsi, M.; Saeki, T. Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften ubd siene Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion. Jap. J. Bot. 1953, 14, 22-52.
12. Myneni, R.B.; Ross, J. Photon-Vegetation Interactions. Applications in Optical Remote Sensing and Plant Ecology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1981; p. 565.
13. Myneni, R.B.; Ross, J.; Asrar, G. A review on the theory of photon transport in leaf canopies. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 1989, 45, 1-153.
14. Chen, S.G.; Shao, B.Y.; Impens, I.; Ceulemans, R. Effects of plant canopy structure on light interception and photosynthesis. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. 1994, 52, 115-123.
15. Planchais, I.; Sinoquet, H. Foliage determinants of light interception in sunny and shaded branches of Fagus sylvatica (L.). Agr. Forest Meteorol. 1998, 89, 241-253.
16. Flerchinger, G.N.; Yu, Q. Simplified expressions for radiation scattering in canopies with ellipsoid leaf angle distributions. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2007, 144, 230-235.
17. Sinoquet, H.; Thanisawanyangura, S.; Mabrouk, H.; Kasemsap, P. Characterization of the light environment in canopies using 3d digitising and image processing. Ann. Bot. 1998, 82, 203-212.
18. Van der Zande, D.; Mereu, S.; Nadezhdina, N.; Cermak, J.; Muys, B.; Coppin, P.; Manes, F. 3D upscaling of transpiration from leaf to tree using ground-based LiDAR: Application on a Mediterranean Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) tree Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2009, 149, 1573-1583.
19. Prusinkiewicz, P.; Lindenmayer, A. The algorithmic beauty of plants; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1990; p. 228.
20. de Reffye, P.; Edelin, C.; Francon, J.; Jaeger, M.; Puech, C. Plant models faithful to botanical structure and development. Comput. Graphics 1988, 22, 151-158.
21. Pharr, M.; Humphreys, G. Physically Based Rendering from Theory to Implementation; Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004; p. 860.
22. Hosgood, B.; Jacquemoud, S.; Andreoli, G.; Verdebout, J.; Pedrini, G.; Schmuck, G. Leaf optical properties experinment (LOPEX93). In Report EUR 16095, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Remote Sensing Applications: Ispra, Italy; 1994, p. 21.
23. Genard, M.; Baret, F.; Simon, D. A 3D peach canopy model used to evaluate the effect of tree architecture and density on photosynthesis at a range of scales. Ecol. Model. 2000, 128, 197-209.
24. De Pury, D.G.G.; Farquhar, G.D. Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant Cell Env. 1997, 20, 537-557.
25. Raulier, F.; Bernier, P.Y.; Ung, C-H. Canopy photosynthesis of sugar maple (Acer saccharum): comparing big-leaf and multilayer extrapolations of leaf-level measurements. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19, 407-420.
26. Kucharic, J.C.; Norman M.J.; Gower, T.S. Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19, 697-706.
27. Wang, W.-M.; Li, Z.-L.; Su, H.-B. Comparison of leaf angle distribution functions: Effects on extinction coefficient and fraction of sunlit foliage. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2007, 143, 106-122.
28. Phattaralerphong, J.; Sinoquet, H. A method for 3d reconstruction of tree crown volume from photograqphs: assessment with 3d-digitized plants. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25, 1229-1242.
29. Takeda, T.; Oguma, H.; Sano, T.; Yone, Y.; Fujinuma, Y. Estimating the plant area density of a Japanese larch (Larix Kaempferi Sarg.) plantation using ground-based laser scanner. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2008, 148, 428-438.
30. Martens, S.N.; Ustin, S.L. Measurement of tree canopy architecture. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1991, 12, 1525-1545.
31. Godin, C.; Costes, E.; Sinoquet, H. A method for describing plant architecture which integrates topology and geometry. Ann. Bot. 1999, 84, 343-357.
32. Bartelink, H.H. Radiation interception by forest trees: a simulation study on effects of stand density and foliage clustering on absorption and transmission. Ecol. Model. 1998, 105, 231-225.
33. Jonckheere, I.G.C. Consistent determination of leaf area index and quantification of foliage distribution in forest canopies based on digital hemispherical photography. Ph.D. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2005; pp. 109-157.
34. Dauzat, J. Simulated plants and radiative transfer simulations. In Crop Structure and Light Microclimate. Characterization and Applications; Varlet-Grancher, C., Bonhomme, R., Sinoquet, H. Eds.; INRA: Paris, France, 1993; 271-278.
35. Saito, K.; Kumagai, Y.; Honjo, T.; Ishida, Y.; Lecoustre, R.; de Reffye, P. Photo-realistic forest landscape simulation-application of GIS and plant modeling technique-. Nicograph. Paper Contest 1993, 9, 226-236.
36. Castel, T.; Caraglio, Y.; Beaudoin, A.; Borne, F. Using SIR-C SAR data and the AMAP model for forest attibutes retrival and 3-D stand simulation. Rem. Sens. Env. 2001, 75, 279-290.
37. de Reffye, P.; Houllier, F.; Blaise, F.; Barthelemy, D.; Dauzat, J.; Auclair, D. A model simulating above- and below- ground tree architecture with agroforestry applications. In Proceedings of IUFRO 20th World Congress, Tempere, Finland, 1995; pp. 175-197.
38. Jarvis, P.G.; Leverenz, J.W. Productivity of temperate, deciduous and evergreen forests. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, N.S., Vol. 12D, Physiological Plant Ecology, IV.; Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1983; pp. 233-280.
39. Wang, H.; Baldocchi, D.D. A numerical model for canopy radiation within a deciduous forest. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 1989, 46, 313-337.
40. Ross, J. The radiation regime and the architecture of plant stands. Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1981; p. 391.
41. Goudriaan, J. The barebones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 1988, 43, 155-169.
42. Oker-Blom, P. Photosynthetic radiation regime and canopy structure in modelled forest stands. Acta For. Fenn. 1986, 197, 1-44.
43. Meir, P.; Kruijt, B.; Broadmeadow, M.; Barbosa, E.; Kull, O.; Carswell, F.; Nombre, A.; Jarvis, P.G. Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area. Plant Cell Env. 2002, 25, 343-357.
44. Cannell, M.G.T. Physiological basis of wood production: a review. Scand. J. Forest Res. 1989, 4, 459-490.
45. Field, C.B. Allocating leaf nitrogen for the maximisation of carbon gain: leaf age as a control on the allocation program. Oecologia 1983, 56, 341-347.
46. Hirose, T.; Werger, M.J.A.; Pons, T.L.; van Rheenen, J.W.A. Canopy structure and leaf nitrogen distribution in a stand of Lysimachia vulgaris L. as influenced by stand density. Oecologia 1988, 77, 145-150.
47. Campbell, G.S.; Norman, J.H. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1998; p. 186.
48. Wang, Y.P.; Jarvis, P.G. Mean leaf angles for the ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 1988, 43, 319-321.