A visual art interface to an embedded sequence of maps

Cartography and Geographic Information Science

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 185-192

  Moore, Antoni ^a   Marinescu, Diana ^b   Tenzer, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b YouniqueCreative   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Art; Habitat extent; Interactivity; Kea; Sequential maps

Indexed keywords

ART; HABITAT EXTENT; INTERACTIVITY; KEA; SEQUENTIAL MAPS;

DATA VISUALIZATION; ECOSYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES; VISUALIZATION;

ARTS COMPUTING;

BIRD; CARTOGRAM; COLONIZATION; MAP GRAPHICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

NEW ZEALAND;

PSITTACIDAE;

EID: 80051742861     PISSN: 15230406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1559/15230406382185     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Caquard, S. and D.R.F. Taylor. 2005. Art, Maps and Cybercartography: Stimulating Reflexivity among Map-Users. In D.R.F. Taylor (ed.), Cybercartography: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.285-307.
2. Cartwright, W, G. Gartner and A. Lehn (eds.) 2009. Cartography and Art. Berlin: Springer.
3. Casey, E.S. 2005. Earth-Mapping: Artists Reshaping Landscape. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Diamond, J. and A.B. Bond. 1999. Kea, Bird of Paradox: The Evolution and Behaviour of a New Zealand Parrot. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Edsall, R.M. and L.R. Sidney. 2005. Applications of a Cognitively Informed Framework for the Design of Interactive Spatio-temporal Representations. In: J. Dykes, A.M. MacEachren and M-J. Kraak (eds.), Exploring Geovisualization. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 577-589.
6. Eisner, W. 1985. Comics and Sequential Art. Tamarac, FL: Poorhouse Press.
7. Elliot, G. and J. Kemp. 2004. Effect of hunting and predation on kea, and a method of monitoring kea populations: Results of kea research on the St.Arnaud Range. DOC Science Internal Series 181, Wellington: Department of Conservation.
8. Fleming, C.A. 1979. The Geological History of New Zealand and its Life. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
9. Holdaway, R.N. 1993. First North Island fossil record of Kea, and morphological and morphometric comparison of Kea and Kaka. Kotornis 40(2): 95-108.
10. Isham, H. 2004. Image of the Sea: Oceanic Consciousness in the Romantic Century. New York: Peter Lang.
11. Iturrioz, T. and M. Wachowicz. 2010. An Artistic Perspective for Affective Cartography. In: K. Kriz, W. Cartwright and L. Hurni (eds.), Mapping Different Geographies. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, pp.74-92.
12. Jung, J-K. 2009. Computer-Aided Qualitative GIS: A software-level integration of qualitative research and GIS. In: M. Cope and S. Elwood (eds.). Qualitative GIS - A Mixed Methods Approach. Los Angeles: Sage, pp.115-135.
13. Krygier, J.B. 1995. Cartography as an art and a science? Cartographic Journal 32(1): 3-10. (Pubitemid 26443613)
14. Lakoff, G. and M.Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Leathwick J.R. 1998. Are New Zealand's Nothofagus species in equilibrium with their environment? Journal of Vegetation Science 9(5): 719-732. (Pubitemid 29087415)
16. McCloud, S. 1993. Understanding Comics. New York: Harper Collins.
17. McCloud, S. 2000. Reinventing Comics. New York: Harper Collins.
18. Marriner, G.R. 1908. The Kea: A New Zealand Problem. Christchurch: Marriner Bros, and Co.
19. Peltzer, D.A., R.B. Allen and G.M. Rogers. 2005. Dieback and recruitment of the forest dominants Nothofagus fusca and Libocedrus bidwilli, central North Island, New Zealand. Science for Conservation 255, Wellington: Department of Conservation.
20. Raper, J.F. 2000. Multidimensional Geographic Information Science. London: Taylor and Francis.
21. Wakelin, M.D. 1991. Analysis and Review of National Kea and Kaka Databases. Science and Research Internal Report No.99. Wellington: Department of Conservation.