Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 94, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 4708-4714

  De Roos, A P W ^a,b   Schrooten, C ^a   Druet, T ^c  

^a CRV   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Genomic prediction; Genomic relationship matrix; Haplotype; Single nucleotide polymorphism

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 80051726990     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3905     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Calus M.P.L., Meuwissen T.H.E., de Roos A.P.W., Veerkamp R.F. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 2008, 178:553-561.
2. Druet T., Georges M. A hidden Markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Genetics 2010, 184:789-798.
3. Druet T., Schrooten C., de Roos A.P.W. Imputation of genotypes from different single nucleotide polymorphism panels in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:5443-5454.
4. Grisart B., Coppieters W., Farnir F., Karim L., Ford C., Berzi P., Cambisano N., Mni M., Reid S., Simon P., Spelman R., Georges M., Snell R. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res. 2002, 12:222-231.
5. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
6. Hayes B.J., Chamberlain A.J., McPartlan H., Macleod I., Sethuraman L., Goddard M.E. Accuracy of marker assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle. Genet. Res. 2007, 89:215-220.
7. Meuwissen T.H.E., Goddard M.E. Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2004, 36:261-279.
8. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
9. Scheet P., Stephens M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: Applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 78:629-644.
10. Su S.Y., Balding D.J., Coin L.J.M. Disease association tests by inferring ancestral haplotypes using a hidden Markov model. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:972-978.
11. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
12. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassel C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.