Urban Regime Theory and the Reform of Public Schools: Governance, Power, and Leadership

Handbook of Education Politics and Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 89-108

  Shipps, Dorothy ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051718112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203887875-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto Schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.
3. Apple, M. W. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.
4. Blase, J., and Anderson, G. (1995). Micropolitics of education leadership: From control to empowerment. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Bolman, L. G., and Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Brunner, C. C., and Schumaker, P. (1998). Power and gender in the “new view” public schools. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 30-45.
7. Bulkley, K. (2007). Bringing the private into the public: Changing the rules of the game, and new regime politics in Philadelphia public education. In K. Bulkley and L. Fusarelli (Eds.), The politics of privatization in education: The 2007 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association [Special issue]. Education Policy, 21(1), 155-184.
8. Burns, P. (2003). Regime theory, state government and a takeover of urban education. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 285-303.
9. Chatterji, M. (2004). Evidence on “What works”: An argument for extended term mixed-method (ETMM) evaluation designs. Educational Researcher, 33(9), 3-13.
10. Cohen, D. K. (1978). Reforming school politics. Harvard Education Review, 48(4), 429-447.
11. Counts, G. (1928). School and society in Chicago. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
12. Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education. New York: Knopf.
13. Cremin, L. A. (1988). American education: The metropolitan experience, 1876-1980. New York: Harper and Row.
14. Cuban, L. (1976). Urban school chiefs under fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Cuban, L. (2001). Leadership for student learning: Urban school leadership-different in kind and degree. Washington D.C.: Institute for Educational Leadership.
16. Cuban, L. (2005). The blackboard and the bottom line: Why schools can’t be businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Cuban, L., and Usdan, M. (Eds.). (2003). Powerful reforms with shallow roots: Getting good schools in six cities. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Cucchiara, M. (2005). A “higher-class” of school reform: Urban revitalization, middle-class parents and public schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.
19. Danzberger, J., Kirst, M. W., and Usdan, M. (1993). A framework for redefining the role and responsibilities of local school boards. Washington D.C.: Institute for Educational Leadership.
20. Denters, B., and Mossberger, K. (2006). Building blocks for a methodology for comparative urban political research. Urban Affairs Review, 41(4), 550-571.
21. DiGaetano, A. (1993). Urban regimes in comparative perspective: The politics of urban development in Britain. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29(1), 54-83.
22. DiGaetano, A. (1997). Urban governing alignments and realignments in comparative perspective: Developmental politics in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, England, 1980-1996. Urban Affairs Review, 32(6), 844-870.
23. DiGaetano, A., and Lawless, P. (1999). Urban governance and industrial decline: Governing structures and policy agendas in Birmingham and Sheffield, England and Detroit Michigan, 1980-1997. Urban Affairs Review, 34(4), 546-577.
24. Firestone, W. A., and Shipps, D. (2005). How do leaders interpret conflicting accountabilities to improve student learning? In W. A. Firestone and C. Reihl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 81-100). New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Henig, J., Hula, R., Orr, M., and Pedscleaux, D. (1999). Building civic capacity for school reform: Race, politics and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Hess, F. (1999). Spinning wheels: the politics of urban school reform. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
27. Hess, F. M., and Kelly, A. P. (2005). The accidental principal. Education Next, 5(3), 34.
28. Honig, M. I., and Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 31-36.
29. Hostetler, K. (2005). What is “good” educational research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 17-21.
30. Iannacone, L. (1975). Education policy systems: A study guide for educational administrators. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova University Press.
31. Johnson Jr., B. L. (2003). Those nagging headaches: Perennial issues and tensions in the politics of education field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 41-61.
32. Johnson, R. B., and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
33. Jones, B. D., and Bachelor, L. W. (1993). The sustaining hand: Community power and corporate power (2nd. ed.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
34. Kantor, P., Savitch, H. V., and Haddock, S. V. (1997). The political economy of urban regimes: A comparative perspective. Urban Affairs Review, 32(3), 348-377.
35. Kilburn, H. W. (2004). Explaining U.S. urban regimes: A qualitative comparative analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 39(5), 633-651.
36. Lagemann, E. C. (1995). National standards and public debate. Teachers College Record, 96(3), 369-379.
37. Lauria, M. (Ed.). (1997). Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Lindblom, C. E. (1988). Democracy and the market system. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
39. Lindblom, C. E., and Woodhouse, E. J. (1993). The policy making process (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization and urban school reform. New York: Routledge Falmer.
41. Malen, B. (1995). The micropolitics of education: Mapping multiple dimensions of power relations in school politics. In J. D. Scribner and D. H. Layton (Eds.), The study of education politics: The 1994 year book of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 147-168). New York: Taylor and Francis.
42. March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734-749.
43. Marshall, C., Mitchell, D. E., and Wirt, F. M. (1989). Culture and education policy in American states. New York: Falmer Press.
44. Marshall, C., and Scribner, J. D. (1991). “Its all political”: Inquiry into the micropolitics of education. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 347-355.
45. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.
46. Mickelson, R. A. (1999). International Business Machinations: A case study of corporate involvement in local educational reform. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 476-512.
47. Mickelson, R. A. (Ed.). (2000). Children on the streets of the Americas. New York: Routledge.
48. Mossberger, K., and Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 26(6), 810-835.
49. Ouchi, W. G., and Segal, L. G. (2003). Making schools work: A revolutionary plan to get your children the education they need. New York: Simon and Schuster.
50. Owen, J. C. (2006). The impact of politics in local education: Navigating white water. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
51. Peterson, P. E. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Pierre, J. (2005). Comparative urban governance: uncovering complex causalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 446-462.
53. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Pois, J. (1964). The school board crisis: A Chicago case study. Chicago: Educational Methods.
55. Portz, J., Stein, L., and Jones, R. R. (2001). City schools and city politics: Institutions and leadership in Pittsburgh, Boston and St. Louis (C. Schools, Trans.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
56. Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Public Agenda. (2001). Trying to stay ahead of the game: Superintendents and principals talk about school leadership. New York: Author.
58. Ray, C. A., and Mickelson, R. A. (1990). Corporate leaders, resistant youth and school reform in Sunbelt City: The political economy of education. Social Problems, 37(2), 178-190.
59. Rich, W. (1996). Black mayors and school politics: The failure of reform in Detroit, Gary and Newark. New York: Garland.
60. Rich, W. C., and Chambers, S. (2004). Cleveland: Takeovers and makeovers are not the same. In J. R. Henig and W. C. Rich (Eds.), Mayors in the middle: Politics, race and mayoral control of urban schools (pp. 159-190). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic and educational reform to close the Blackwhite achievement gap. New York: Teachers College Press.
62. Scribner, J. D., Aleman, E., and Maxcy, B. (2003). Emergence of the politics of education field: Making sense of the messy center. Education Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 10-40.
63. Sellers, J. M. (2005). Re-placing the nation: An agenda for comparative urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 419-445.
64. Shipps, D. (1997). The invisible hand: Big business and Chicago school reform. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 73-116.
65. Shipps, D. (2003). Pulling together: Civic capacity and urban school reform. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 841-878.
66. Shipps, D. (2005, September 1-4). “Sticky” school reform: A path dependent argument about corporate influence and union weakness in 20th century Chicago. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
67. Shipps, D. (2006). School reform, corporate style: Chicago 1880-2000. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
68. Sites, W. (1997). The limits of urban regime theory: New York City under Koch, Dinkins and Guiliani. Urban Affairs Review, 32(4), 536-557.
69. Smith, S. S. (2004). Boom for whom? Education, desegregation, and development in Charlotte. Albany: State University of New York Press.
70. Sonenshein, R. J. (2004). The city at stake: Succession, reform and the battle for Los Angeles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Stein, M. K., and Nelson, B. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423-448.
73. Stoker, G. (1998). Regime theory and urban politics. In H. Judge, G. Stoker, and H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (3rd ed., pp. 54-71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Stone, C. N. (1987). The study of the politics of urban development. In C. N. Stone and H. T. Sanders (Eds.), The politics of urban development (pp. 3-22). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
75. Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
76. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1-23.
77. Stone, C. N. (1996). Civic capacity and urban education (Grant Report No. RED 9350139). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
78. Stone, C. N. (1998a). Political leadership in urban politics. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, and H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 96-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79. Stone, C. N. (1998b). Regime analysis and the study of urban politics. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(3), 249-260.
80. Stone, C. N. (Ed.). (1998c). Changing urban education. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
81. Stone, C. N. (2004). It’s more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1), 1-19.
82. Stone, C. N. (2005). Looking backward to look forward: Reflections on urban regime analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 40(3), 309-341.
83. Stone, C. N., Henig, J., Jones, B. F., and Pierannuzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
84. Streeck, W., and Schmitter, P. (Eds.). (1985). Private interest government: Beyond market and state. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
85. Tyack, D. B., and Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86. Viteritti, J. P. (1999). Choosing equality: School choice, the constitution and civil society. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.