Lux and Veritas: Approaching the thorny process of peer-review and "peer-Review" 2011

World Neurosurgery

Volumn 76, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 1-

  Apuzzo, Michael L J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITOR; EDITORIAL; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NEUROSURGERY; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLICATION; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; VALIDATION PROCESS;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PEER REVIEW; RESEARCH;

EID: 80051715201     PISSN: 18788750     EISSN: 18788769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.056     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. R. Akerman Technical solutions: evolving peer review for the internet Nature 2006 http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04997.html Accessed June 28, 2011
2. M.L.J. Apuzzo Mission nearly impossible: thoughts on shepherding a society journal Neurosurgery 63 2008 1009 1010
3. M.L.J. Apuzzo Peer-review: a citadel under siege Neurosurgery 63 2008 821
4. R. Horton Genetically modified food: consternation, confusion, and crack-up MJA 72 2000 148 149 (Pubitemid 30131302)
5. C.G. Jennings Quality and value: the true purpose of peer review Nature 2006 http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05032.html Accessed June 28, 2011
6. K. Lee, and L. Bero Ethics: increasing accountability Nature 2006 http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05007.html Accessed June 28, 2011
7. E. Wager Ethics: what is it for? Nature 2006 http://www.nature.com/ nature/peerreview/debate/nature04990.html Accessed June 28, 2011