Empirical evidence for son-killing X chromosomes and the operation of SA-zygotic drive

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2011, Pages

  Friberg, Urban ^a,b   Stewart, Andrew D ^a   Rice, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SUBSTITUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; ENDOSYMBIONT; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GAMETOGENESIS; GENOME IMPRINTING; MALE; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; SEX CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME; ZYGOTE; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DIPLOIDY; GENE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; INHERITANCE; METABOLISM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO;

DROSOPHILA SIMULANS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DIPLOIDY; FEMALE; GAMETOGENESIS; GENES, INSECT; HAPLOIDY; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX FACTORS; SEX RATIO; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME; ZYGOTE;

EID: 80051710860     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023508     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dawkins R, (1976) The selfish gene Oxford Oxford University Press pp. xii. 224.
2. Hurst LD, (1992) Intragenomic Conflict as an Evolutionary Force. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 248: 135-140.
3. Burt A, Trivers R, (2006) Genes in conflict: the biology of selfish genetic elements Cambridge, Mass. Belknap Press of Harvard University Presspp. viii, 602 p., [608] p. of plates.
4. Hurst GD, Jiggins FM, (2000) Male-killing bacteria in insects: mechanisms, incidence, and implications. Emerg Infect Dis 6: 329-336.
5. Miller PM, Gavrilets S, Rice WR, (2006) Sexual conflict via maternal-effect genes in ZW species. Science 312: 73-73.
6. Rice WR, Gavrilets S, Friberg U, (2008) Sexually antagonistic "zygotic drive" of the sex chromosomes. PLoS Genet 4: e1000313.
7. Rice WR, Gavrilets S, Friberg U, (2009) Sexually antagonistic chromosomal cuckoos. Biol Lett 5: 686-688.
8. Beeman RW, Friesen KS, Denell RE, (1992) Maternal-Effect Selfish Genes in Flour Beetles. Science 256: 89-92.
9. Seidel HS, Rockman MV, Kruglyak L, (2008) Widespread genetic incompatibility in C. elegans maintained by balancing selection. Science 319: 589-594.
10. Rice WR, Gavrilets S, Friberg U, (2010) The evolution of sex-specific grandparental harm. Proc Biol Sci 277 (1694): 2727-2735.
11. Hurst GDD, Hurst LD, Majerus MEN, (1997) Cytoplsmic sex-ratio distorters. In: O'Neill SL, Hoffmann AA, Werren JH, editors. Influencial Passengers Oxford Oxford University Press pp. 125-154.
12. Noor MAF, Coyne JA, (1995) Research Note. Drosophila information service 76: 151-152.
13. Neeley JC, (1971) Some environmental influences on metafemale viability in Drosophila melanogaster. J Hered 62: 334-338.
14. Tao Y, Araripe L, Kingan SB, Ke Y, Xiao H, et al. (2007) A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. II: an X-linked distorter. PLoS Biol 5: e293.
15. Fox M, Sear R, Beise J, Ragsdale G, Voland E, et al. (2010) Grandma plays favourites: X-chromosome relatedness and sex-specific childhood mortality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 277: 567-573.
16. Tao Y, Masly JP, Araripe L, Ke Y, Hartl DL, (2007) A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. I: An autosomal suppressor. PLoS Biol 5 (11): e292.
17. Lloyd V, (2000) Parental imprinting in Drosophila. Genetica 109: 35-44.
18. Golic KG, Golic MM, Pimpinelli S, (1998) Imprinted control of gene activity in Drosophila. Current Biology 8: 1273-1276.
19. Menon DU, Meller VH, (2009) Imprinting of the Y Chromosome Influences Dosage Compensation in roX1 roX2 Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 183: 811-820.
20. Maggert KA, Golic KG, (2002) The Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster exhibits chromosome-wide imprinting. Genetics 162: 1245-1258.
21. Koerich LB, Wang X, Clark AG, Carvalho AB, (2008) Low conservation of gene content in the Drosophila Y chromosome. Nature 456: 949-951.
22. Lemos B, Araripe LO, Hartl DL, (2008) Polymorphic Y chromosomes harbor cryptic variation with manifold functional consequences. Science 319: 91-93.
23. Jaenike J, Dyer KA, Reed LK, (2003) Within-population structure of competition and the dynamics of male-killing Wolbachia. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 1023-1036.
24. Hurst GDD, Majerus MEN, (1993) Why Do Maternally Inherited Microorganisms Kill Males. Heredity 71: 81-95.
25. Hoffmann AA, Nielsen KM, (1985) The Effect of Resource Subdivision on Genetic-Variation in Drosophila. American Naturalist 125: 421-430.
26. Williamson DL, Poulson DF, (1979) Sex ratio organisms (spiroplasmas) of Drosophila. In: Whitcomb RF, Tully JG, editors. The Mycoplasmas New York Academic Press pp. 175-208.
27. Montenegro H, Solferini VN, Klaczko LB, Hurst GD, (2005) Male-killing Spiroplasma naturally infecting Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Mol Biol 14: 281-287.