Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is there a problem?

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2574-2577

  Bignell, Mark ^a   Hindmarsh, Andrew ^a   Nageswaran, Haritharan ^b   Mothe, Bhavani ^c   Jenkinson, Andrew ^c   Mahon, David ^b   Rhodes, Michael ^a  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b MUSGROVE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c HOMERTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cosmetic outcome; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCAR; SCAR ASSESSMENT TOOL; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UMBILICUS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 80051701531     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1589-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. E Muhe 1992 Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Endoscopy 24 754 758 1468391 10.1055/s-2007-1009119 1:STN:280: DyaK3s7gsF2itQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23023061)
2. A Cuschieri 1991 Minimal access surgery and the future of interventional laparoscopy Am J Surg 161 385 387 1825763 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-B 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7lvVSqsw%3D%3D
3. S Kim S Kim S Mun 2009 Should subcostal and lateral trocars be used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised, prospective study J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19 749 753 19961366 10.1089/lap.2009.0159
4. P Leggett C Bissell R Churchman-Winn C Ahn 2001 Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients Surg Endosc 15 293 296 11344432 10.1007/s004640000302 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FgvFyisw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32294706)
5. M Golder M Rhodes 1998 Prospective randomised trial of 5- and 10-mm epigastric ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 85 1066 1067 9717997 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00799.x 1:STN:280:DyaK1czot1SqtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28360768)
6. W Cheah J Lenzi J So C Kum P Goh 2001 Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 88 45 47 11136308 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01636.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7isFGnsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32066055)
7. T Bisgaard B Klaeskov R Trap H Kehlet J Rosenberg 2000 Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study Surg Endosc 14 340 344 10790551 10.1007/s004640020014 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c3ltlyntA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30262375)
8. R Tacchino F Greco D Matera 2009 Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar Surg Endosc 23 896 899 18815836 10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3htVWktg%3D%3D
9. A Chow S Purkayastha O Aziz P Paraskeva 2010 Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique Surg Endosc 24 709 714 19688389 10.1007/s00464-009-0655-4
10. P Durani D McGrouther M Ferguson 2009 The patient scar assessment questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars Plas Reconstr Surg 123 1481 1489 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a205de 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXlt1Cltbc%3D
11. G Vander Velpen S Shimi A Cuschieri 1993 Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach Gut 34 1448 1451 8244119 10.1136/gut.34.10.1448 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FmtlKjtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23293638)
12. A Ros E Nilsson 2004 Abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after cholecystectomy: outcome of a randomised trial comparing laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy Scand J of Gastroenterol 39 773 777 10.1080/00365520410005540 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2crkvF2lsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39106827)
13. R McCloy D Randall S Schug H Kehlet C Simanski F Bonnet F Camu B Fischer G Joshi N Rawal E Neugebauer 2008 Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes Surg Endosc 22 2541 2553 18810546 10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1
14. M Sajid M Khan K Ray E Cheek M Baig 2009 Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a metaanalysis ANZ J Surg 79 437 442 19566866 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04945.x
15. M-T Huang W Wang P-L Wei R Chen W Lee 2003 Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy Arch Surg 138 1017 1023 12963662 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.1017 (Pubitemid 37099880)
16. Y Novitsky K Kercher D Czerniach G Kabah K Gallagher-Dorval M Callery D Litwin J Kelly 2005 Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy Arch Surg 140 1178 1183 16365239 10.1001/archsurg.140.12.1178 (Pubitemid 41815900)
17. A Chow S Purkayastha P Paraskeva 2009 Appendicetomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience Surgical Innovation 16 211 217 19723692 10.1177/1553350609344413
18. D Solomon R Bell A Duffy K Roberts 2010 Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve Surg Endosc 24 12 2954 2957 10.1007/s00464-010-1070-6 20401494 10.1007/s00464-010-1070-6
19. C Edwards A Bradshaw P Ahearne P Dematos T Humble R Johnson D Mauterer P Soosaar 2010 Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases Surg Endosc 24 9 2241 2247 10.1007/s00464-010-0943-z 20198490 10.1007/s00464-010-0943-z
20. J Erbella G Bunch 2010 Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients Surg Endosc 24 8 1958 1961 10.1007/s00464-010-0886-4 20112110 10.1007/s00464-010-0886-4