Direct concentration and viability measurement of yeast in corn mash using a novel imaging cytometry method

Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1109-1115

  Chan, Leo L ^a   Lyettefi, Emily J ^a   Pirani, Alnoor ^a   Smith, Tim ^a   Qiu, Jean ^a   Lin, Bo ^a  

^a Nexcelom Bioscience LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Cellometer ; Corn mash; Fermentation; Fluorescence detection; Imaging cytometry; Yeast viability

Indexed keywords

BIOFUEL;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORN; CORN MASH; CYTOMETRY; FERMENTATION; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; FUNGAL VIABILITY; NONHUMAN;

BIOFUELS; BRAZIL; CELL SURVIVAL; CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHARUM; UNITED STATES; ZEA MAYS;

SACCHARUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 80051693097     PISSN: 13675435     EISSN: 14765535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0890-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. DA Abbott WM Ingledew 2004 Buffering capacity of whole corn mash alters concentrations of organic acids required to inhibit growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production Biotechnol Lett 26 1313 1316 15483392 10.1023/B:BILE.0000044924.76429.71 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpslOntro%3D
2. D Antoni VV Zverlov WH Schwarz 2007 Biofuel from microbes Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77 23 35 17891391 10.1007/s00253-007-1163-x 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXhtFGgs7fE (Pubitemid 47577359)
3. JL Argueso MF Carazzolle PA Mieczkowski FM Duarte OVC Netto SK Missawa F Galzerani GGL Costa RO Vidal MF Noronha M Dominska MGS Andrietta SR Andrietta AF Cunha LH Gomes FCA Tavares AR Alcarde FS Dietrich JH McCusker TD Petes GAG Pereira 2009 Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production Genome Res 19 2258 2270 19812109 10.1101/gr.091777.109 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFGqtbfF
4. LC Basso HVd Amorim AJd Oliveira ML Lopes 2008 Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil FEMS Yeast Res 8 1155 1163 18752628 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00428.x 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlyqsrrE
5. AR Boyd TS Gunasekera PV Attfield K Simic SF Vincent DA Veal 2003 A flow-cytometric method for determination of yeast viability and cell number in a brewery FEMS Yeast Res 3 11 16 12702241 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhsVCjt74%3D (Pubitemid 36255459)
6. D Deere J Shen G Vesey P Bell P Bissinger D Veal 1998 Flow cytometry and cell sorting for yeast viability assessment and cell selection Yeast 14 147 160 9483803 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<147::AID-YEA207>3.0.CO;2-L 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXptVynuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28062865)
7. C Foglieni C Meoni AM Davalli 2001 Fluorescent dyes for cell viability: an application on prefixed conditions Histochem Cell Biol 115 223 229 11326750 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjtFWquro%3D (Pubitemid 32247199)
8. WR Gibbons SR Hughes 2009 Integrated biorefineries with engineered microbes and high-value co-products for profitable biofuels production In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45 218 228 10.1007/s11627-009-9202-1 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1MXntlSitbs%3D
9. GW Gordon G Berry XH Liang B Levine B Herman 1998 Quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurments using fluorescence microscopy Biophys J 74 2702 2713 9591694 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77976-7 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXislWku7s%3D (Pubitemid 28225264)
10. XH Hu MH Wang T Tan JR Li H Yang L Leach RM Zhang ZW Luo 2007 Genetic dissection of ethanol tolerance in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics 175 1479 1487 17194785 10.1534/genetics.106.065292 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXltFKhsLY%3D (Pubitemid 46798246)
11. LM King DO Schisler JJ Ruocco 1981 Epifluorescent method for detection of nonviable yeast J Am Soc Brew Chem 39 52 54 1:CAS:528:DyaL3MXkslygtbY%3D
12. M Koksch G Rothe V Kiefel G Schmitz 1995 Fluorescence resonance energy transfer as a new method for the epitope-specific characterization of anti-platelet antibodies J Immunol Methods 187 53 67 7490458 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00166-8 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXpt1aktrk%3D
13. E Ling K Shirai R Kanekatsu K Kiguchi 2003 Classification of larval circulating hemocytes of the silkworm Bombyx mori, by acridine orange and propidium iodide staining Histochem Cell Biol 120 505 511 14610679 10.1007/s00418-003-0592-6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpslOitbk%3D (Pubitemid 38058205)
14. K Mascotti J McCullough SR Burger 2000 HPC viability measurement: trypan blue versus acridine orange and propidium iodide Transfusion 40 693 696 10864990 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40060693.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjtFKgsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30413323)
15. R McCaig 1990 Evaluation of the fluorescent dye 1-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonic acid for yeast viability determination J Am Soc Brew Chem 48 22 25 1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXhsFKlsr8%3D
16. AD Michelson 1996 Flow cytometry: A clinical test of platelet function Blood 87 12 4925 4936 8652804 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjsFGisLo%3D (Pubitemid 26189833)
17. DR Mills 1941 Differential staining of living and dead yeast cells J Food Sci 6 4 361 371 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1941.tb16295.x
18. S Nikolić L Mojović M Rakin D Pejin V Nedović 2009 Effect of different fermentation parameters on bioethanol production from corn meal hydrolyzates by free and immobilized cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84 497 503 10.1002/jctb.2068
19. A Periasamy 2201 Fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy: A mini review J Biomed Opt 6 3 287 291 10.1117/1.1383063
20. Pirani A (2010) "Yeast concentration and viability using image-based fluorescence analysis." Nature Methods, Application Notes (6), Online Version
21. PR Selvin JE Hearst 1994 Luminescence energy transfer using a terbium chelate: Improvements on fluorescence energy transfer Proc Natl Acad Sci 91 10024 10028 7937831 10.1073/pnas.91.21.10024 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXmslGku70%3D (Pubitemid 24311941)
22. ML Slater 1976 Rapid nuclear staining method for Saccharomyces cerevisiae J Bacteriol 126 3 1339 1341 59726
23. Smart K (2003) Brewing yeast fermentation performance, 2 Ed., Blackwell Science Ltd
24. M Solomon J Wofford C Johnson D Regan MH Creer 2010 Factors influencing cord blood viability assessment before cryopreservation Transfusion 50 820 830 19919556 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02491.x
25. A Stengel M Goebel I Yakubov LX Wang D Witcher T Coskun Y Tache G Sachs NWG Lambrecht 2009 Identification and characterization of Nesfatin-1 immunoreactivity in endocrine cell types of the rat gastric oxyntic mucosa Endocrinology 150 1 232 238 18818289 10.1210/en.2008-0747 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1MXmt1arsw%3D%3D
26. SE Szabo SL Monroe S Fiorino J Bitzan K Loper 2004 Evaluation of an automated instrument for viability and concentration measurements of cryopreserved hematopoietic cells Lab Hematol 10 109 111 15224767 10.1532/LH96.04020 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czit12ktQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38868035)
27. F Taylor AJ Mcaloon JC Craig P Yang J Wahjudi SR Eckhoff 2001 Fermentation and costs of fuel ethanol from corn with quick-germ process Appl Biochem Biotechnol 94 1 41 49 11393355 10.1385/ABAB:94:1:41 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3MXktVWqsrY%3D (Pubitemid 32463717)
28. JT Trevors RL Merrick I Russell GG Stewart 1983 A comparison of methods for assessing yeast viability Biotechnol Lett 5 2 131 134 10.1007/BF00132172
29. MLR Vairo 1962 A modified adsorption method for determining percentage of dead yeast cells Biotechnol Bioeng 4 247 254 10.1002/bit.260040215
30. AA Vertès M Inui H Yukawa 2008 Technological options for biological fuel ethanol J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 15 16 30 18349547 10.1159/000111989 (Pubitemid 351412300)
31. CA Wallen R Higashikubo LA Dethlefsen 1980 Comparison of two flow cytometric assays for cellular RNA-acridine orange and propidium iodide Cytometry 3 3 155 160 10.1002/cyto.990030303
32. SMV Zandycke O Simal S Gualdoni KA Smart 2003 Determination of yeast viability using fluorophores J Am Soc Brew Chem 61 1 15 22 (Pubitemid 36345685)