메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1135-1141

Minimize the Use of Minimization with Unequal Allocation

Author keywords

Adaptive randomization; Analyze as you randomize; Asymptotics; Minimization; Permutation test; Permuted block randomization; Randomization; Rerandomization test; Temporal trend; Unequal allocation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION; ANALYZE AS YOU RANDOMIZE; ASYMPTOTICS; MINIMISATION; PERMUTATION TESTS; PERMUTED BLOCK RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMISATION; RERANDOMIZATION TEST; TEMPORAL TRENDS; UNEQUAL ALLOCATION;

EID: 80051681560     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01545.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (39)

References (14)
  • 1
    • 85153158835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A simulation study of the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation to two groups in the regression situation
    • Aickin, M. (2009). A simulation study of the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation to two groups in the regression situation. The International Journal of Biostatistics 5, 1-17.
    • (2009) The International Journal of Biostatistics , vol.5 , pp. 1-17
    • Aickin, M.1
  • 3
    • 0002848242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Centralized treatment allocation in comparative clinical trials
    • Buyse, M. (2000). Centralized treatment allocation in comparative clinical trials. Applied Clinical Trials 9, 32-37.
    • (2000) Applied Clinical Trials , vol.9 , pp. 32-37
    • Buyse, M.1
  • 5
    • 0021812356 scopus 로고
    • Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: A review
    • Kalish, L. A. and Begg, C. B. (1985). Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: A review. Statistics in Medicine 4, 129-144.
    • (1985) Statistics in Medicine , vol.4 , pp. 129-144
    • Kalish, L.A.1    Begg, C.B.2
  • 7
    • 0032372107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research
    • Ludbrook, J. and Dudley, H. (1998). Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. American Statistician 52, 127-132.
    • (1998) American Statistician , vol.52 , pp. 127-132
    • Ludbrook, J.1    Dudley, H.2
  • 8
    • 0019977995 scopus 로고
    • Practical experience of randomization in cancer trials: An international survey
    • Pocock, S. J. and Lagakos, S. W. (1982). Practical experience of randomization in cancer trials: An international survey. British Journal of Cancer 46, 368-375.
    • (1982) British Journal of Cancer , vol.46 , pp. 368-375
    • Pocock, S.J.1    Lagakos, S.W.2
  • 9
    • 0016799829 scopus 로고
    • Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial
    • Pocock, S. J. and Simon, R. (1975). Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 31, 103-115.
    • (1975) Biometrics , vol.31 , pp. 103-115
    • Pocock, S.J.1    Simon, R.2
  • 12
    • 0018750994 scopus 로고
    • Restricted randomization designs in clinical trials
    • Simon, R. (1979). Restricted randomization designs in clinical trials. Biometrics 35, 503-512.
    • (1979) Biometrics , vol.35 , pp. 503-512
    • Simon, R.1
  • 13
    • 0016211783 scopus 로고
    • Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups
    • Taves, D. R. (1974). Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 15, 443-453.
    • (1974) Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics , vol.15 , pp. 443-453
    • Taves, D.R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.