The observation of incremental validity does not always mean unique contribution to prediction

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 276-279

  Ree, Malcolm James ^a   Carretta, Thomas R ^b  

^a OUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051677369     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00556.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement error models. New York: Wiley.
3. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis. London: Sage.
4. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5. Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2006). The role of measurement error in familiar statistics. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 99-112.
6. Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991a). The stability of convergent estimates of g. Intelligence, 15, 271-278.
7. Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991b). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321-332.
8. Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter, & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 419-450). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
9. Walters, L. C., Miller, M. R., & Ree, M. J. (1993). Structured interviews for pilot selection: No incremental validity. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 25-38.