The ease of lying

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 908-911

  Verschuere, Bruno ^a,b   Spruyt, Adriaan ^a   Meijer, Ewout H ^b   Otgaar, Henry ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deception; Intentionality; Response inhibition

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECEPTION; HABIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DECEPTION; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 80051669231     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Christ S.E., Essen D.C., Watson J.M., Brubaker L.E., McDermott K.B. The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:1557-1566.
2. Dike C.C., Baranoski M., Griffith E.E.H. Pathological lying revisited. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2005, 33:342-349.
3. Donders F.C. On speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica 1868/1969, 30:412-431.
4. Fullam R.S., Mckie S., Dolan M.C. Psychopathic traits and deception: Functional magnetic resonance imaging study. British Journal of Psychiatry 2009, 194:229-235.
5. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:197-216.
6. Grubin D. Commentary: Getting at the truth about pathological lying. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2005, 33:350-353.
7. Johnson R., Barnhardt J., Zhu J. The deceptive response: Effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:217-253.
8. Johnson R., Barnhardt J., Zhu J. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: An event-related brain potential study. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24:386-404.
9. Lykken D.T. The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology 1959, 43:385-388.
10. Spence S.A., Farrow T.F.D., Herford A.E., Wilkinson I.D., Zheng Y., Woodruff P.W.R. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport 2001, 12:2849-2853.
11. Spence S.A., Kaylor-Hughes C.J. Looking for truth and finding lies: The prospects for a nascent neuroimaging of deception. Neurocase 2008, 14:68-81.
12. Spence S.A., Kaylor-Hughes C.J., Brook M.L., Lankappa S.T., Wilkinson I.D. 'Munchausen's syndrome by proxy' or a 'miscarriage of justice'? An initial application of functional neuroimaging to the question of guilt versus innocence. European Psychiatry 2008, 23:309-314.
13. Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Verschuere, G. Ben-Shakhar, E. Meijer (Eds.).
14. Verschuere B., De Houwer J. Detecting concealed information in less than a second: Response-latency based measures. Memory detection 2011, Cambridge University Press, London. B. Verschuere, G. Ben-Shakhar, E. Meijer (Eds.).
15. Yang Y.L., Raine A. What is pathological lying? Reply. British Journal of Psychiatry 2006, 189:86.
16. Yang Y.L., Raine A., Narr K.L., Lencz T., LaCasse L., Colletti P., et al. Localisation of increased prefrontal white matter in pathological liars. British Journal of Psychiatry 2007, 190:174-175.