Computational simulation of aortic aneurysm using FSI method: Influence of blood viscosity on aneurismal dynamic behaviors

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 812-821

  Wang, Xiaohong ^a   Li, Xiaoyang ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Aortic aneurysm; Blood viscosity; Dynamic behavior; Fluid structure interaction; Simulation

Indexed keywords

AORTIC ANEURYSMS; AXIAL DISPLACEMENTS; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD VISCOSITY; CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL SHAPE; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR; DYNAMIC BEHAVIORS; ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT; HIGH VISCOSITIES; ON FLOW; SIMULATION; WALL SHEAR STRESS;

BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; PATIENT TREATMENT; SHEAR FLOW;

VISCOSITY;

ANEURYSM; ANEURYSM DIAMETER; ANEURYSMAL SAC; AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; BLOOD VISCOSITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FLOW KINETICS; FLOW RATE; FLUID CONTINUITY EQUATION; FLUID MOMENTUM EQUATION; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION METHOD; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; STRUCTURE CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; STRUCTURE MOMENTUM EQUATION; WALL AXIAL DISPLACEMENT;

AORTIC ANEURYSM; BLOOD VISCOSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 80051667123     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Most A.S., Ruocco N.A., Gewirtz H. Effect of a reduction in blood viscosity on maximal myocardial oxygen delivery distal to a moderate coronary stenosis. Circulation 1986, 74:1085-1092.
2. Kwon O., Krishnamoorthy M., Cho Y.I., Sankovic J.M., Banerjee R.K. Effect of blood viscosity on oxygen transport in residual stenosed artery following angioplasty. J. Biomech. Eng. 2008, 130:011003.
3. Dintenfass L. Blood rheology as diagnostic and predictive tool in cardiovascular diseases. Angiology 1974, 25:365-372.
4. Letcher R.L., Chien S., Pickering T.G., Laragh J.H. Elevated blood viscosity in patients with borderline essential hypertension. Hypertension 1983, 5:757-762.
5. Lowe G.D. Blood rheology in arterial disease. Clin. Sci. 1986, 71:137-146.
6. Ding K., Liao D., Song X., Zeng Y. Alteration of blood hemorheologic properties during cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats. J. Biomech. 2000, 34:171-175.
7. Wolfgang K., Malte S., Birgit F., Angela D., Hannelore L., Edzard E. Plasma viscosity and the risk of coronary heart disease: results from the MONICA-Augsburg cohort study, 1984 to 1992. Arterioscler. Thomb. Vasc. Biol. 1998, 18:768-772.
8. Yildnm C., Ahmet M.S., Hakan A., Nilufer K., Kamber D. Effects of nitroglycerin on blood viscosity and hemodynamics. Curr. Ther. Res. 1999, 60:478-485.
9. Vaisman S., Kensey K., Cho Y.I. Effect of hemodialysis on whole blood viscosity. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 2009, 32:329-335.
10. Moriarty P.M., Gibson C.A., Kensey K.R., Hogenauer W. Effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol apheresis on blood viscosity. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004, 93:1044-1046.
11. Stammers A.H., Vang S.N., Mejak B.L., Rauch E.D. Quantification of the effect of altering hematocrit and temperature on blood viscosity. J. Extracorporeal Technol. 2003, 35:143-151.
12. Di L.V., Rigalli A., Cinara L., Hernandez G. Effect of disodium monofluorphosphate on plasma and blood viscosity in the rat. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2008, 40:259-265.
13. Martinez M., Vaya A., Labios M., Gabriel F., Guiral V., Aznar J. The effect of long-term treatment with hypotensive drugs on blood viscosity and erythrocyte deformability in patients with essential arterial hypertension. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 1997, 17:193-198.
14. Schievink W.I., Hageman L.M., Velis D.N., van der Werf D.J., Hardeman M.R., Goedhart P.T. Relationship between blood viscosity and cerebral ischemia after surgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Surg. Neurol. 1987, 27:537-542.
15. Khanafer K.M., Gadhoke P., Berguer R., Bull J.L. Modeling pulsatile flow in aortic aneurysms: effect of non-Newtonian properties of blood. Biorheology 2006, 43:661-679.
16. Chatziprodromou I., Tricoli A., Poulikakos D., Ventikos Y. Haemodynamics and wall remodelling of a growing cerebral aneurysm: a computational model. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:412-426.
17. Boussel L., Rayz V., McCulloch C., Martin A., Acevedo-Bolton G., Lawton M., Higashida R., Smith W.S., Young W.L., Saloner D. Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008, 39:2997-3002.
18. Maier A., Gee M.W., Reeps C., Pongratz J., Eckstein H.H., Wall W.A. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38:3124-3134.
19. Valencia A., Ledermann D., Rivera R., Bravo E. Blood flow dynamics and fluid-structure interaction in patient-specific bifurcating cerebral aneurysms. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2008, 58:1081-1100.
20. Raghavan M.L., Vorp D.A. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:475-482.
21. Dunmore-Buyze P.J., Moreau M., Fenster A., Holdsworth D.W. In vitro investigation of calcium distribution and tissue thickness in the human thoracic aorta. Physiol. Meas. 2002, 23:555-566.
22. Lam S., Fung G., Cheng S., Chow K. A computational study on the biomechanical factors related to stent-graft models in the thoracic aorta. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2008, 46:1129-1138.
23. Di Martino E.S., Guadagni G., Fumero A., Ballerini G., Spirito R., Biglioli P., Redaelli A. Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Med. Eng. Phys. 2001, 23:647-655.
24. Bazilevs Y., Gohean J.R., Hughes T.J.R., Moser R.D., Zhang Y. Patient-specific isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput. Method Appl. M 2009, 198:3350-3534.
25. Salazar Vázquez B.Y., Martini J., Chávez Negrete A., Cabrales P., Tsai A.G., Intaglietta M. Microvascular benefits of increasing plasma viscosity and maintaining blood viscosity: counterintuitive experimental findings. Biorheology 2009, 46:167-179.
26. Li Z., Kleinstreuer C. Fluid-structure interaction effects on sac-blood pressure and wall stress in a stented aneurysm. J. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 127:622-671.
27. Li Z., Kleinstreuer C. Analysis of biomechanical factors affecting stent-graft migration in an abdominal aortic aneurysm model. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2264-2273.
28. Tan F.P.P., Torii R., Borghi A., Mohiaddin R.H., Wood N.B., Xu X.Y. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of wall stress and flow patterns in a thoracic aortic aneurysm. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 2009, 1:179-199.
29. Souli M., Mahmadi K., Aquelet N. ALE and fluid structure interaction. Mater. Sci. Forum 2004, 465-466:143-150.
30. Hirt C.W., Amsden A.A., Cook J.L. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J. Comput. Phys. 1974, 14:227-253.
31. Molony D.S., Callanan A., Kavanagh E.G., Walsh M.T., McGloughlin T.M. Fluid-structure interaction of a patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with an endovascular stent-graft. Biomed. Eng. Online 2009, 10:24.
32. Black M.M., Hose D.R., Lawford P.V. The origin and significance of secondary flows in the aortic arch. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 1995, 19:192-197.
33. Liu B. The influences of stenosis on the downstream flow pattern in curved arteries. Med. Eng. Phys. 2007, 29:868-876.
34. Li Z., Kleinstreuer C. A comparison between different asymmetric abdominal aortic aneurysm morphologies employing computational fluid-structure analysis. Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluids 2007, 26:615-631.
35. Jou L.D., Lee D.H., Mawad M.E. Cross-flow at the anterior communicating artery and its implication in cerebral aneurysm formation. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:2189-2195.
36. Chong C.K., How T.V. Flow patterns in an endovascular stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:89-97.
37. Khanafer K., Bull J., Berguer R. Fluid-structure interaction of turbulent pulsatile flow within a flexible wall axisymmetric aortic aneurysm model. Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluid 2009, 28:88-102.
38. Peattie R.A., Asbury C.L., Bluth E.I., Riehle T.J. Steady flow in models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part II: wall stresses and their implication for in vivo thrombosis and rupture. J. Ultrasound. Med. 1996, 15:689-696.
39. Karmonik C., Bismuth J., Davies M.G., Shah D.J., Younes H.K., Lumsden A.B. A Computational fluid dynamics study pre- and post-stent graft placement in an acute type B aortic dissection. J. Vasc. Endovasc. 2011, 45:157-164.
40. Harter L.P., Gross B.H., Gallen R.A., Barth R.A. Ultrasonic evaluation of abdominal arotic thrombus. J. Ultrasound Med. 1983, 1:315-318.
41. Dintenfass L. Relationship between blood viscosity factors and diseases or fitness: some pitfalls and some new opportunities. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 1987, 10:7-19.
42. Dintenfass L. Blood viscosity factors in severe nondiabetic and diabetic retinopathy. Biorheology 1977, 14:151-157.
43. Jensen-Urstad K., Jensen-Urstad M. Carotid artery diameter correlates with risk factors for cardiovascular disease in a population of 55-year-old subjects. Stroke 1999, 30:1572-1576.
44. Maier A., Gee M.W., Reeps C., Pongratz J., Eckstein H.-H., Wall W.A. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38:3124-3134.
45. Limet R., Sakalihassan N., Albert A. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vascular. Surg. 1991, 14:540-548.
46. Brown P.M., Zelt D.T., Sobolev B. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. J. Vascular. Surg. 2003, 37:280-284.
47. Vorp D.A. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:1887-1902.
48. Johnston B.M., Johnston P.R. The relative effects of arterial curvature and lumen diameter on wall shear stress distributions in human right coronary arteries. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52:2531.
49. Morris L., Delassus P., Grace P., Wallis F., Walsh M., McGloughlin T. Effects of flat, parabolic and realistic steady flow inlet profiles on idealised and realistic stent graft fits through abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Med. Eng. Phys. 2006, 28:19-26.
50. Wolters B.J.B.M., Rutten M.C.M., Schurink G.W.H., Kose U., De Hart J., Van De Vosse F.N. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med. Eng. Phys. 2005, 27:871-883.
51. Hsiai T.K., Cho S.K., Honda H.M., Hama S., Navab M., Demer L.L., Ho C.M. Endothelial cell dynamics under pulsating flows: significance of high versus low shear stress slew rates Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 30:646-656.