Integration of an invasive consumer into an estuarine food web: Direct and indirect effects of the New Zealand mud snail

Oecologia

Volumn 167, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 169-179

  Brenneis, Valance E F ^a,b   Sih, Andrew ^a   de Rivera, Catherine E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apparent competition; Columbia River estuary; Potamopyrgus antipodarum; Predation

Indexed keywords

CARBON; NITROGEN;

AMPHIPOD; APPARENT COMPETITION; CRAYFISH; DIET; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOOD CONSUMPTION; FOOD WEB; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIVE SPECIES; JUVENILE; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MUD; PREDATION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SNAIL;

AMPHIPODA; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CRAYFISH; DIET; FISH; FOOD CHAIN; INTRODUCED SPECIES; ISOPODA; NEW ZEALAND; PREDATION; SNAIL;

AMPHIPODA; ANIMALS; ASTACOIDEA; CARBON ISOTOPES; DIET; FISHES; FOOD CHAIN; INTRODUCED SPECIES; ISOPODA; NEW ZEALAND; NITROGEN ISOTOPES; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SNAILS;

COLUMBIA RIVER; NEW ZEALAND;

ASTACOIDEA; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; GASTROPODA; GNORIMOSPHAEROMA INSULARE; INVERTEBRATA; LEPTOCOTTUS; LEPTOCOTTUS ARMATUS; PACIFASTACUS LENIUSCULUS; PLATICHTHYS; PLATICHTHYS STELLATUS; PLEURONECTOIDEI; POTAMOPYRGUS ANTIPODARUM;

EID: 80051663715     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1962-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alonso A, Castro-Diéz P (2008) What explains the invading success of the aquatic mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Hydrobiidae, Mollusca)? Hydrobiologia 614: 107-116.
2. Baxter PWJ, Sabo JL, Wilcox C, McCarthy MA, Possingham HP (2008) Cost-effective suppression and eradication of invasive predators. Conserv Biol 22: 89-98.
3. Bersine K, Brenneis VEF, Draheim RC, Wargo Rub AM, Zamon JE, Litton RK, Hinton SA, Sytsma MA, Cordell JR, Chapman JW (2008) Distribution of the invasive New Zealand mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) in the Columbia River Estuary and its first recorded occurrence in the diet of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Biol Invasions 10: 1381-1388.
4. Bottom DL, Jones KK (1990) Species composition, distribution, and invertebrate prey of fish assemblages in the Columbia River Estuary. Prog Oceanogr 25: 243-270.
5. Brenneis VEF, Sih A, de Rivera C (2010) Coexistence in the intertidal: interactions between the non-indigenous New Zealand mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum and the native estuarine isopod Gnorimosphaeroma insulare. Oikos 119: 1755-1764.
6. Bruce RL, Moffitt CM (2005) Survival of New Zealand Mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) in the gastrointestinal tract of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). In: 4th New Zealand Mudsnail Conference, Montana State University, Bozeman.
7. Bruno J, Stachowicz J, Bertness M (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 119-125.
8. Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64: 1297-1304.
9. Davidson TM, Brenneis VEF, de Rivera C, Draheim R, Gillespie GE (2008) Northern range expansion and coastal occurrences of the New Zealand mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray, 1843) in the northeast Pacific. Aquat Invasions 3: 349-353.
10. Davis MA (2003) Biotic globalization: does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity? Bioscience 53: 481-489.
11. Duffy EJ (2003) Early marine distribution and trophic interactions of juvenile salmon in Puget Sound. University of Washington, Seattle.
12. Gerard C, Blanc A, Costil K (2003) Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Mollusca: Hydrobiidae) in continental aquatic gastropod communities: impact of salinity and trematode parasitism. Hydrobiologia 493: 167-172.
13. Hall RO, Dybdahl MF, VanderLoop MC (2006) Extremely high secondary production of introduced snails in rivers. Ecol Appl 16: 1121-1131.
14. Hanson P (1997) Fish bioenergetics 3. 0. University of Wisconsin System Sea Grant Institute, Center for Limnology, Wisconsin.
15. Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, an the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12: 197-229.
16. Holt RD, Kotler BP (1987) Short-term apparent competition. Am Nat 130: 412-430.
17. Jardine T, McGeachy S, Paton C, Savoie M, Cunjak R (2003) Stable isotopes in aquatic systems: sample preparation, analysis, and interpretation. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Sacramento, p 39.
18. McCarter NH (1986) Food and energy in the diet of brown and rainbow trout from Lake Benmore, New Zealand. NZ J Mar Fresh Res 20: 551-559.
19. Noonburg E, Shuter B, Abrams P (2003) Indirect effects of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on the planktonic food web. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60: 1353-1368.
20. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 127: 171-179.
21. Pinkas L, Oliphant MS, Iverson ILK (1971) Food habits of Albacore, Bluefin Tuna, and Bonito in California waters. In: Fish Bulletin, vol 152. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
22. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83: 703-718.
23. Rodriguez L (2006) Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol Invasions 8: 927-939.
24. Rowles AD, O'Dowd DJ (2009) New mutualism for old: indirect disruption and direct facilitation of seed dispersal following Argentine ant invasion. Oecologia 158: 709-716.
25. Sagar PM, Glova GJ (1995) Prey availability and diet of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) in relation to riparian willows (Salix spp.) in three New Zealand streams. NZ J Mar Freshw Res 29: 527-537.
26. Savidge J (1987) Extinction of an island forest avifauna by an introduced snake. Ecology 68: 660-668.
27. Sax D, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH, Bruno JG, Dawson MN, Gaines SD, Grosberg RK, Hastings A, Holt RD, Mayfield MN, O'Conner MI, Rice WR (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 465-470.
28. Schreiber ESG, Lake PS, Quinn GP (2002) Facilitation of native stream fauna by an invading species? Experimental investigations of the interaction of the snail, Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Hydrobiidae) with native benthic fauna. Biol Invasions 4: 317-325.
29. 15N) and literature dietary data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54: 1142-1158.
30. Vinson M, Baker MA (2008) Poor growth of rainbow trout fed New Zealand mud snails Potamopyrgus antipodarum. North Am J Fish Manag 28: 701-709.
31. White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke AR (2006) Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Divers Distrib 12: 433-455.
32. Woodward G, Papantoniou G, Edwards F, Lauridsen RB (2008) Trophic trickles and cascades in a complex food web: impacts of a keystone predator on a stream community structure and ecosystem processes. Oikos 117: 683-692.
33. Zhang Y, Richardson JS (2007) Unidirectional prey-predator facilitation: apparent prey enhance predators' foraging success on cryptic prey. Biol Lett 3: 348-351.