Why prek for all?

Phi Delta Kappan

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 8-11

  Doggett, Libby ^a   Wat, Albert ^b  

^a Pew Center on the States   (United States)

^b Pre K Now   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051663113     PISSN: 00317217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003172171009200303     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barnett, W. Steven, Kirsty Brown, and Rima Shore. "The Universal vs. Targeted Debate: Should the United States Have Preschool for All?" Preschool Policy Matters 6 (April 2004).
2. Barnett, W. Steven, Dale J. Epstein, Allison H. Friedman, Rachel A. Sansanelli, and Jason T. Hustedt. The State of Preschool: 2009 State Preschool Yearbook. New Brunswick
3. N.J.: National Institute for Early Education Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 2009.
4. Belfield, Clive R., Milagros Nores, Steve Barnett, and Lawrence Schweinhart. "The High/Scope Perry Preschool Program: Cost-Benefit Analysis Using Data from the Age-40 Followup." Journal of Human Resources 41, no. 1 (Winter 2006): 162-190.
5. Coley, Richard J. An Uneven Start: Indicators of Inequality in School Readiness. ETS Policy Information Report. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 2002.
6. Frede, Ellen, Kwanghee Jung, W. Steven Barnett, and Alexandra Figueras. The APPLES Blossom: Abbott Preschool Program Longitudinal Effects Study (APPLES) Preliminary Results Through 2nd Grade, Interim Report. New Brunswick, N.J.: National Institute for Early Education Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 2009. http://nieer.org/pdf/apples_second_grade_results.pdf.
7. Gormley, William Jr., Ted Gayer, Deborah Phillips, and Brittany Dawson. "The Effects of Oklahoma's Universal Pre-K Program on School Readiness: An Executive Summary." Washington, D.C.: Center for Research on Children in the United States, Georgetown University, 2004.
8. Karoly, Lynn A., and James H Bigelow. The Economics of Investing in Universal Preschool Education in California. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corp., 2005.
9. Lynch, Robert. Enriching Children, Enriching the Nation: Public Investment in High-Quality Prekindergarten. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, 2007.
10. Mead, Sara. Education Reform Starts Early: Lessons from New Jersey's PreK-3rd Reform Efforts. Washington, D.C.: New America Foundation, 2009.
11. Reynolds, Arthur J., Judy A. Temple, Dylan L. Robertson, and Emily A. Mann. "Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24, no. 4 (December 2002): 267-303.
12. Wat, Albert. The Pre-K Pinch: Early Education and the Middle Class. Washington, D.C.: Pre-K Now, 2008.
13. Wat, Albert. The Case for Pre-K in Education Reform: A Summary of Program Evaluation Findings. Pew Center on the States Research Series. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on the States, 2010.
14. Watson, Sara. The Right Policy at the Right Time: The Pew PreKindergarten Campaign. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on the States, 2010.
15. West, Jerry, Kristin Denton, and Elvira Germino-Hausken. America's Kindergartners: Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99, Fall 1998. Statistical Analysis Report NCES 2000-070. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2000. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000070.pdf.