Evaluation of perpendicular reflection intensity for assessment of caries lesion activity/inactivity

Caries Research

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 408-414

  Neuhaus, K W ^a   Nyvad, B ^b   Lussi, A ^a   Jaruszewski, L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c Private Dental Practice   (Germany)

Author keywords

Caries activity; Diagnostics; Enamel caries; Natural caries lesions; Non cavitated caries lesions; Profilometry; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PROCEDURE; ENAMEL; HUMAN; LIGHT; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BAYES THEOREM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES ACTIVITY TESTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; HUMANS; LIGHT; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 80051610595     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000330530     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ando M, Shaikh S, Eckert GJ, Fontana M, Zero DT: Reflection and surface roughness measurements for characterization of caries progression. Caries Res 2009; 43: 215.
2. Ando M, Eckert GJ, Zero DT: Preliminary study to establish a relationship between tactile sensation and surface roughness. Caries Res 2010; 44: 24-28.
3. Ganss C, Klimek J, Borkowksi N: Characteristics of tooth wear in relation to different nutritional patterns including contemporary and medieval subjects. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 54-60.
4. Hall A, Girkin JM: A review of potential new diagnostic modalities for caries lesions. J Dent Res 2004; 83(suppl 1):C89-C94. (Pubitemid 44131382)
5. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Coordinating Committee: International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) Revised Criteria Manual. 2009. www.icdas.org/assets/downloads/ Appendix.pdf (accessed 2011).
6. Jaruszewski L: Measuring device and method for determining the activity status of initial decayed enamel lesions. German Patent Application DE 102005052294 A, 2005.
7. Jaruszewski L: An optical sensor for the quantitative in vivo differentiation of active and inactive enamel lesion surfaces-a pilot study. Caries Res 2008; 42: 229.
8. Karlsson L: Caries detection methods based on changes in optical properties between healthy and carious tissue. Int J Dent 2010; 2010: 270729.
9. Kühnisch J, Bücher K, Henschel V, Albrecht A, Garcia-Godoy F, Mansmann U, Hickel R, Heinrich-Weltzien R: Diagnostic performance of the universal visual scoring system (UniViSS) on occlusal surfaces. Clin Oral Invest 2011; 15: 215-223.
10. Novaes TF, Matos R, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP, Mendes FM: Performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and conventional methods in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth-in vivo study. Caries Res 2010; 44: 465-471.
11. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V: Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive lesions. Caries Res 1999; 33: 252-260.
12. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V: Construct and predictive validity of clinical caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion activity. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 117-122. (Pubitemid 41764122)
13. Nyvad B: Diagnosis versus detection of caries. Caries Res 2004; 38: 192-198. (Pubitemid 38716209)
14. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.
15. Thylstrup A, Bruun C, Holmen L: In vivo caries models-mechanisms for caries initiation and arrestment. Adv Dent Res 1994; 8: 147-154.