Sampled data Errors-in-Variables systems

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 15, Issue PART 1, 2009, Pages 1157-1162

  Agüero, Juan C ^a   Goodwin, Graham C ^a   Söderström, Torsten ^b   Yuz, Juan I ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

Author keywords

Errors in Variables; Identifiability; Sampled data models

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS TIME; CONTINUOUS-TIME SIGNAL; ERRORS IN VARIABLES; IDENTIFIABILITY; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; INPUT-OUTPUT; SAMPLED DATA MODELS; SAMPLED-DATA;

CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS;

ERRORS;

EID: 80051607863     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20090706-3-FR-2004.0225     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. V. S. Adamchik. On the Hurwitz function for rational arguments. Applied mathematics and computation, (187):3-12, 2007. (Pubitemid 46635699)
2. J. C. Agüero and G. C. Goodwin. Identifiability of errors in variables dynamic systems. Automatica, 44(2):371-382, 2008.
3. B. D. O. Anderson and M. Deistler. Identifiability in dynamic errors-in-variables model. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 5 (1):001-013, 1984.
4. T. M. Apostol. Introduction to analytic number theory. Springer-Verlag, 1976.
5. K. J. Åström, P. Hagander, and J. Sternby. Zeros of sampled systems. Automatica, 20(1):31-38, 1984.
6. M. J. Blachuta. On approximate pulse transfer functions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 44(11):2062-2067, 1999. (Pubitemid 30531643)
7. A. Feuer and G.C. Goodwin. Sampling in Digital Signal Processing and Control. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1996.
8. J. Gillberg. Frequency domain identification of continuous-time systems. PhD thesis, Linköping University, Sweden, 2006.
9. J. Gillberg and L. Ljung. Frequency domain identification of continuous-time ARMA models from sampled data. Automatica, 2008. To appear.
10. G. C. Goodwin, S. F. Graebe, and M. E. Salgado. Control System Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
11. G. C. Goodwin, J. I. Yuz, and J. C. Agüero. Relative error issues in sampled data models. In IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
12. E. K. Larsson. Identification of Stochastic Continuous-time Systems. PhD thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2003.
13. E. K. Larsson. Limiting sampling results for continuous ARMA systems. International Journal of Control, 78:461-473, 2005. (Pubitemid 41657404)
14. R. Pintelon and J. Schoukens. Frequency domain maximum likelihood estimation of linear dynamic errors-in-variables models. Automatica, 43(4):621-630, 2007. (Pubitemid 46341232)
15. R. Pintelon, J. Schoukens, and Y. Rolain. Frequency-domain approach to continuous-time system identification: Some practical aspects. In H. Garnier and L. Wang, editors, Continuous-time Model Identification from Sampled Data, chapter 3, pages 67-89. Springer, 2008.
16. T. Söderström. Discrete-Time Stochastic Systems: Estimation and control. Springer, second edition, 2002.
17. T. Söderström. Errors-in-variables methods in system identification. Automatica, 43(6):939-958, 2007. (Pubitemid 46653815)
18. T. Söderström, E.K. Larsson, K. Mahata, and M. Mossberg. Using continuous-time modeling for errors-in-variables identification. In 14th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Newcastle, Australia, 2006.
19. S. Thil, H. Garnier, M. Gilson, and K. Mahata. Continuous-time model identification from noisy input/output measurements using fourth-order cumulants. 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 4257-4262, Dec. 2007. (Pubitemid 351277813)
20. B. Wahlberg. Limit results for sampled systems. International Journal of Control, 48(3):1267-1283, 1988.
21. S. R. Weller, W. Moran, B. Ninness, and A. D. Pollington. Sampling zeros and the Euler-Frobenius polynomials. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 46(2):340-343, 2001. (Pubitemid 32259340)