Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and inhalational anesthesia using isoflurane for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 328-332

  Ankichetty, Saravanan P ^a   Ponniah, Manickam ^a   Cherian, V T ^a   Thomas, Sarah ^a   Kumar, Kamal ^a   Jeslin, L ^a   Jeyasheela, K ^b   Malhotra, Naveen ^c  

^a Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care ^*  (India)

^b CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^c POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Anesthetic techniques; Hypotensive; Isoflurane; Otolaryngological surgeries; Propofol

Indexed keywords

ISOFLURANE; PROPOFOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDUCED HYPOTENSION; INHALATIONAL ANESTHESIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NAUSEA; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEDATION; SIDE EFFECT; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; VOMITING;

EID: 80051602877     PISSN: 09709185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.83675     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Stammberger H, Posawetz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1990;247:63-76.
2. Stankiewicz JA. Complications of endoscopic intranasal ethmoidectomy. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1270-1273.
3. Maniglia AJ. Fatal and other major complications of endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1991;101:349-354.
4. Boezaart AP, van der Merwe J, Coetzee A. Comparison of sodium nitroprusside- and esmolol-induced controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:373-376.
5. Ryu JH, Sohn IS, Do SH. Controlled hypotension for middle ear surgery: A comparison between remifentanil and magnesium sulphate. Br J Anaesth 2009;229:1-6.
6. Ray M, Bhattacharjee DP, Hajra B, Pal R, Chatterjee N. Effect of clonidine and magnesium sulphate on anaesthetic consumption, haemodynamics and postoperative recovery: A comparative study. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:137-141.
7. Tirelli G, Bigarini S, Russolo M, Lucangelo U, Gullo A. Total intravenous anaesthesia in endoscopic sinus-nasal surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2004;24:137-144.
8. Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, Gouldson R. Propofol: An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1005-1043.
9. Nair S, Collins M, Hung P, Rees G, Close D, Wormald PJ. The effect of beta-blocker premedication on the surgical field during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1042-1046.
10. Mandal P. Isoflurane anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2003;47:37-40.
11. Elsharnouby NM, Elsharnouby MM. Magnesium sulphate as a technique of hypotensive anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2006;96: 727-731.
12. Price ML, Walmsley A, Swaine C, Ponte J. Comparison of total intravenous anaesthetic technique using a propofol infusion, with an inhalational technique using enflurane for day case surgery. Anaesthesia 1998;43:84-87.
13. DiFlorio T. Is propofol a dopamine antagonist? Anesth Analg 1993;77:200-201.
14. Visser K, Hassink EA, Bonsel GJ, Moen J, Kalkman CJ. Randomized controlled trial of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane-nitrous oxide: Postoperative nausea with vomiting and economic analysis. Anesthesiology 2001;95:616-626.