Propagule pressure hypothesis not supported by an 80-year experiment on woody species invasion

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1311-1316

  Nuñez, Martin A ^a   Moretti, Adolfo ^b   Simberloff, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b Intendencia del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIONAL PARK; PROPAGULE; TWENTIETH CENTURY;

ARGENTINA; NAHUEL HUAPI NATIONAL PARK; NEUQUEN; VICTORIA ISLAND [NEUQUEN];

EID: 80051598257     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19504.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baker H. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. - In: Baker H. and Stebbins G. (eds), The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, pp. 147-168.
2. Barrett W. H. G. 1952. Las especies del genero 'Pinus' cultivadas en la región del Parque nacional Nahuel Huapi. Publicación Técnica no. 18 (nueva serie). - Inst. de Botanica Agrícola, Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
3. Blackburn T. M. et al. 2009. The role of species traits in the establishment success of exotic birds. Global Change Biol. 15: 2852-2860.
4. Bucharova A. and van Kleunen M. 2009. Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. J. Ecol. 97: 230-238.
5. Bustamante R. O. and Simonetti J. A. 2005. Is Pinus radiata invading the native vegetation in central Chile? Demographic responses in a fragmented forest. Biol. Invas. 7: 243-249.
6. Cassey P. et al. 2004. Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 271: S405-S408.
7. Clark C. J. et al. 2007. Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am. Nat. 170: 128-142.
8. Colautti R. I. et al. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invas. 8: 1023-1037.
9. Drake J. M. et al. 1989. Biological invasions: a global perspective. - Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) by Wiley.
10. Elton C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. - Methuen.
11. Fremstad E. and Elven R. 1996. Fremmede planter i Norge. Platanlönn (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) Blyttia 54: 61-78.
12. Greene D. F. and Johnson D. A. 1989. A model of wind dispersal of winged or plumes seeds. Ecology 70: 339-347.
13. Higgins S. L. and Richardson D. M. 1999. Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. Am. Nat. 153: 464-475.
14. Koutché V. 1942. Estación forestal de Puerto Achorena, Isla Victoria; su organización y trabajos. - Boletin forestal correspondiente al año 1941. Ministerio de Agricultura, Dirección de Parques Nacionales.
15. Krivanek M. et al. 2006. Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv. Biol. 20: 1487-1498.
16. Lebedeff N. 1932. Apuntes sobre reforestación de los terrenos desarbolados en la zona del Lago Nahuel Huapi. - Ministerio de Agricultura, Dirección Nacional de Tierras.
17. Lebedeff N. 1942. Apuntes sobre reforestacion artificial en la Isla Victoria. - Boletin Forestal años 1938-1940, Ministerio de Agricultura, Dirección de Parques Nacionales.
18. Lockwood J. L. et al. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 223-228.
19. Lockwood J. L. et al. 2007. Invasion ecology. - Blackwell Scientific Press.
20. Lockwood J. L. et al. 2009. The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Div. Distr. 15: 904-910.
21. Macdonald G. M. et al. 1998. The late quaternary dynamic of pines in northern North America. - In: Richardson D. M. (ed.), Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 122-136.
22. Maron J. L. 2006. The relative importance of latitude matching and propagule pressure in the colonization success of an invasive forb. Ecography 29: 819-826.
23. Martin P. H. et al. 2009. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7: 142-149.
24. Memmott J. et al. 2005. The effect of propagule size on the invasion of an alien insect. J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 50-62.
25. Mooney H. and Drake J. 1986. Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. - Springer.
26. Moulton M. P. et al. 2010. The earliest house sparrow introductions to North America. Biol. Invas. 12: 2955-2958.
27. Myers J. A. and Harms K. E. 2009. Seed arrival, ecological filters, and plant species richness: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 12: 1250-1260.
28. Nathan R. et al. 2000. Spatiotemporal variation in seed dispersal and recruitment near and far from Pinus halepensis trees. Ecology 85: 2156-2169.
29. Nuñez M. A. et al. 2008a. Enemy release or invasional meltdown? Deer preference for exotic and native trees on Isla Victoria, Argentina. Austral Ecol. 33: 317-323.
30. Nuñez M. A. et al. 2008b. Seed predation as a barrier to alien conifer invasions. Biol. Invas. 10: 1389-1398.
31. Nuñez M. A. et al. 2009. Lack of belowground mutualisms hinders Pinaceae invasions. Ecology 90: 2352-2359.
32. Peña E. et al. 2008. Patterns of spread of Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. invasion in a natural reserve in southern South America. For. Ecol. Manage. 256: 1049-1054.
33. Poulsen J. R. et al. 2007. Plants as reef fish: fitting the functional form of seedling recruitment. Am. Nat. 170: 167-183.
34. Reaser J. K. et al. 2008. Saving camels from straws: how propagule pressure-based prevention policies can reduce the risk of biological invasion. Biol. Invas. 10: 1085-1098.
35. Rejmánek M. et al. 2005. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. - In: Mooney H. A. et al. (eds), Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment, pp. 104-161.
36. Rejmánek M. and Richardson D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655-1661.
37. Relva M. A. et al. 2010. Introduced deer affect native plant communities and facilitate non-native tree species in a temperate forest in Patagonia, Argentina. Biol. Invas. 12: 303-311.
38. Richardson D. M. 2006. Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78: 375-388.
39. Richardson D.M. and Higgins S.L. 1998. Pines as invaders in the Southern Hemisphere. - In: Richardson D.M. (ed.), Ecology and biogeography of pines. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 450-473.
40. Richardson D. M. and Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progr. Physical Geogr. 30: 409-431.
41. Richardson D. M. and Rejmánek M. 2004. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Div. Distr. 10: 321-331.
42. Richardson D.M. et al. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Div. Distr. 6: 93-107.
43. Richardson D. M. et al. 2008. Alien conifer invasions in South America: short fuse burning? Biol. Invas. 10: 573-577.
44. Rouget M. and Richardson D. M. 2003. Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. Am. Nat. 162: 713-724.
45. Simberloff D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 81-102.
46. Simberloff D. et al. 2002. Gringos en el bosque: introduced tree invasion in a native Nothofagus/Austrocedrus forest. Biol. Invas. 4: 35-53.
47. Simberloff D. et al. 2003. Introduced species and management of a Nothofagus/Austrocedrus forest. Environ. Manage. 31: 263-275.
48. Simberloff D. et al. 2010. Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecol. 35: 489-504.
49. Turnbull L. A. et al. 2000. Are plant populations seed- limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88: 225-238.
50. Von Holle B. and Simberloff D. 2005. Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86: 3212-3218.
51. Von Holle B. et al. 2003. The importance of biological inertia in plant community resistance to invasion. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 425-432.
52. Wilson J. R. U. et al. 2007. Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Div. Distr. 13: 11-22.