Policies and practices of ability grouping in New Zealand intermediate schools

Support for Learning

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 92-96

  Hornby, Garry ^a   Witte, Chrystal ^a   Mitchell, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Ability grouping; Banding; Intermediate schools; Streaming

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051594893     PISSN: 02682141     EISSN: 14679604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2011.01485.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ARGYS, L. and REES, D. (1996) Detracking America's schools: equity at zero cost? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15, 4, 623-645.
2. BURRIS, C. C. and WELNER, K. G. (2005) Closing the achievement gap by detracking. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 8, 594-598.
3. DUCKWORTH, K., AKERMAN, R., GUTMAN, L. M. and VORHAUS, J. (2009) Influences and Leverages on Low Levels of Attainment: A Review of Literature and Policy Initiatives. Research Report 31. London: Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning, Institute of Education, University of London.
4. FEINSTEIN, L. and SYMONS, J. (1999) Attainment in secondary school. Oxford Economic Papers, 51, 300-321.
5. GAMORAN, A. (1992) Is ability grouping equitable? Synthesis of research. Educational Leadership, 50, 1, 11-17.
6. HALLAM, S. and TOUTOUNJI, I. (1996) What do We Know about the Grouping of Pupils by Ability: A Research Review. London: Institute of Education.
7. HANUSHEK, E. A. and WOESSMANN, L. (2005) Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. CESifo Working Paper No. 1415. [Online at]. Accessed 01/05/08.
8. HATTIE, J. (2009) Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
9. HOUTVEEN, T. and VAN DE GRIFT, W. (2001) Inclusion and adaptive instruction in elementary education. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6, 4, 389-409.
10. IRESON, J., HALLAM, S. and HURLEY, C. (2005) What are the effects of ability grouping on GCSE attainment? British Educational Research Journal, 31, 3, 443-458.
11. KUTNICK, P., SEBBA, J., BLATCHFORD, P., GALTON, M. and THORP, J. (2005) The Effects of Pupil Grouping: Literature Review. Research Report 688. London: DfES.
12. LIPSEY, M. W. and WILSON, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 12, 1181-1209.
13. MACIVER, D. J., REUMAN, D. A. and MAIN, S. R. (1995) Social structuring of the school: studying what is, illuminating what could be. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 375-400.
14. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION (2005) The Schooling Strategy 2005-2010. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
15. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS (2006) Position statement on ability grouping and tracking. [Online at]. Accessed 04/07/08.
16. ROBERTSON, D. and SYMONS, J. (2003) Do peer groups matter? Peer group versus schooling effects on academic attainment. Economica, 70, 31-53.
17. RUBIN, B. (2008) Detracking in context: how local constructions of ability complicate equity-geared reform. Teachers College Record. [Online at]. Accessed 05/11/08.
18. SLAVIN, R. E. (1987) Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: a best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 3, 347-350.
19. SLAVIN, R. E. (1990) Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: a best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 3, 471-499.
20. SLAVIN, R. E. (1996) Education for All: Contexts of Learning. Lisse: Swets and Keitlinger.
21. SMITH, C. M. M. and SUTHERLAND, M. J. (2006) Setting or mixed ability? Pupils' views of the organisational arrangement in their school. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6, 2, 69-75.