Effect of different surface treatments on the repair strength of a nanofilled resin-based composite

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 537-545

  Hamano, Naho ^a   Chiang, Yu Chih ^b   Nyamaa, Indra ^c   Yamaguchi, Hiroaki ^a   Ino, Satoshi ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^c   Kunzelmann, Karl Heinz ^c  

^a KANAGAWA DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Bonding agent; Microtensile bond strength; Resin composite; Silane

Indexed keywords

BONDING AGENT; COMPOSITE SAMPLES; FILLER SURFACES; MICRO-TENSILE BOND STRENGTH; MICRO-TENSILE STRENGTH; NANO-FILLERS; NEGATIVE CONTROL; PRE-TREATMENT; RESIN COMPOSITE; RESIN-BASED COMPOSITE; SEM IMAGE; THERMOMECHANICAL FATIGUE;

ACETONE; BOND (MASONRY); BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); DENTAL COMPOSITES; FILLERS; RESINS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

SURFACE TREATMENT;

ACETONE; ACRYLAMIDE DERIVATIVE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CERAMX; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLOXYPROPYLTRIMETHOXYSILANE; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACETONE; ACRYLAMIDES; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; SILANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 80051575884     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2010-202     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gordan VV. Clinical evaluation of replacement of class V resin based composite restorations. J Dent 2001; 29: 485-488.
2. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo JJr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 41-49.
3. Kawamoto Y, Hinokiyama N, Nemoto M, Shima H, Kawahara K, Shimada K, Yoshinari K, Asano S, Kakehashi Y, Lgarashi T, Saitoh M, Nishiyama M. A study on repair restoration of high-filler-content prosthetic composite resins-effect of surface treatment conditions on bending bond strength. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2001; 45: 632-641.
4. Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 519-525.
5. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 2008; 36: 969-976.
6. Finger WJ, Fritz U. Laboratory evaluation of one-component enamel/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 206-210.
7. Rached RN, Del-Bel Cury AA. Heat-cured acrylic resin repaired with microwave-cured one: bond strength and surface texture. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 370-375.
8. Ino S, Hamano N, Lee MC, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Toyoda M. An analysis of the polymerization reaction of the light curing type of self-etching bonding system using ESR. Adhes Dent 2006; 24: 1-6.
9. Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 363-371.
10. Anusavice KJ. Philips' science of dental materials. 10th ed. Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders Co; 1996. p. 298-299.
11. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Roberson TM. Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 417-424.
12. Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 2003; 31: 521-525.
13. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 299-309.
14. Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 358-360.
15. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 1998; 26: 685-694.
16. Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Ritter AV, Swift EJ. Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 159-164.
17. Hernandez EP, Oshida Y, Platt JA, Andres CJ, Barco MT, Brown DT. Mechanical properties of four methylmethacrylatebased resins for provisional fixed restorations. Biomed Mater Eng 2004; 14: 107-122.
18. Balkenhol M, Michel K, Stelzig J, Wostmann B. Repairability of cross-linked biopolymers. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 152-157.
19. Holmes RG, Rueggeberg FA, Callan, RS, Caughman F, Chan DC, Pashley DH, Looney SW. Effect of solvent type and content on monomer conversion of a model resin system as a thin film. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1506-1512.
20. Spanoudakis J, Young RJ. Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin; Part 2 Effect of particle-matrix adhesion. J Mater Sci 1984; 19: 487-496.