How has Oregon's land use planning system affected property values?

Land Use Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 62-72

  Jaeger, William K ^a   Plantinga, Andrew J ^a   Grout, Cyrus ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INRA   (France)

Author keywords

Land use planning; Land use regulations; Property values; Urban growth boundaries

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; LANDOWNERSHIP; PLANNING SYSTEM; PROPERTY MARKET; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

OREGON; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80051562549     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Acharya G., Bennett L.L. Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2001, 22(2/3):221-238.
2. Anderson, K., Weinhold, D., 2005. Do Conservation Easements Reduce Land Prices? The Case of South Central Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Paper No. 484.
3. Beaton W.P. The impact of regional land-use controls on property values: the case of the New Jersey pinelands. Land Economics 1991, 67(2):172-194.
4. Beaton W.P., Pollock M. Economic impact of growth management policies surrounding the Chesapeake Bay. Land Economics 1992, 68(4):434-453.
5. Doss C.R., Taff S.J. The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 1996, 21(1):120-129.
6. Earnhart D. Using contingent-pricing analysis to value open space and its duration at residential locations. Land Economics 2006, 82(1):17-35.
7. Geoghegan J. Capitalization of open spaces into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2003, 32(1):33-45.
8. Gleeson M.E. Effects of an urban growth management system on land values. Land Economics 1979, 55(3):350-365.
9. Grout, C., Jaeger, W.K., Plantinga, A.J., 2011. Land use regulations and property values in Portland, Oregon: a regression discontinuity design approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics 41 (2), 98-107.
10. Henneberry D.M., Barrows R.L. Capitalization of exclusive agricultural zoning into farmland prices. Land Economics 1990, 66(3):249-258.
11. Irwin E.G., Bockstael N.E. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83:698-704.
12. Jaeger, W.K., Plantinga, A.J., 2007a "How have land use regulations affected property values in Oregon?" Special Report #1077, Oregon State University Extension Service. June 2007. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/pdf/sr/sr%201077.pdf.
13. Jaeger, W.K., Plantinga, A.J., 2007b. The Economics Behind Measure 37 (EM 8925). Oregon State University Extension Service. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/pdf/em/em8925.pdf.
14. Jaeger W.K. The effects of land use regulations on property values. Environmental Law 2006, 26(Spring):105-130.
15. Knapp G.J. The price effects of urban growth boundaries in metropolitan Portland Oregon. Land Economics 1985, 61(1):26-35.
16. Lynch L., Gray W., Geoghegan J. Are farmland preservation program easement restrictions capitalized into farmland prices? What can a propensity score matching analysis tell us?. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 2007, 29(3):502-509.
17. Mahan B.L., Polasky S., Adams R.M. Valuing urban wetlands: a property price approach. Land Economics 2000, 76(1):100-113.
18. Netusil N.R. The effect of environmental zoning and amenities on property values: Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 2005, 81(2):227-246.
19. Nickerson C.J., Lynch L. The effect of farmland preservation programs on farmland prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83(2):341-351.
20. Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Oregon's Statewide Planning Goals & Guidelines 2010, http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/goals.shtml.
21. Phillips J., Goodstein E. Growth management and housing prices: the case of Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy 2000, 18(3):334-344.
22. Ready R.C., Abdalla C.W. The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: estimates from a hedonic pricing model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 87(2):214-326.
23. Richmond H.R., Houchen T.G. Oregon's Public Investment in Conservation, Prosperity and Fairness 2007, The American Land Institute, March. http://www.oregonpublicinvestment.com/.
24. Runge C.F., Duclos M.T., Adams J.S., Goodwin B., Martin J.A., Squires R.D. Government Actions Affecting Land and Property Values: An Empirical Review of Takings and Givings 1996, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, Research Paper.
25. Smith V.K., Poulus C., Kim H. Treating open spaces as an urban amenity. Resource and Energy Economics 2002, 24(1-2):107-129.
26. Spalatro F., Provencher B. An analysis of minimum frontage zoning to preserve lakefront amenities. Land Economics 2001, 77(4):469-481.
27. Thorsnes P. The value of a suburban forest preserve: estimates from sales of vacant residential building lots. Land Economics 2002, 78(3):426-441.