Anisotropic AAA: Computational comparison between four and two fiber family material models

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 2418-2426

  Di Achille, P ^a   Celi, S ^b   Di Puccio, F ^a   Forte, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aneurysm; Anisotropy; Constitutive modeling; Finite element analysis; Wall stress

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS; ANEURYSM; AXIAL STRESS; AXIAL STRETCH; BIAXIAL TESTS; CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRESS; CLINICAL MANAGEMENT; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPARISONS; CONSTITUTIVE MODELING; DATA EXTRAPOLATION; DATA SETS; EFFECTIVE STRESS FIELD; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FINITE ELEMENT CODES; HIGH INCIDENCE; INTRINSIC CHARACTERISTICS; LITERATURE DATA; MATERIAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION; STRAIN ENERGY FUNCTIONS; STRESS-STRAIN; TWO-MATERIALS; WALL STRESS;

ANISOTROPY; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSELS; CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS; CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; TISSUE;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

BIOMATERIAL;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMECHANICS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS TESTING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; WALL STRESS;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR;

EID: 80051557768     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.029     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baek S., Gleason R.L., Rajagopal K.R., Humphrey J.D. Theory of small on large: potential utility in computations of fluid-solid interactions in arteries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007, 196:3070-3078.
2. Basciano C.A., Kleinstreuer C. Invariant-based anisotropic constitutive models of the healthy and aneurysmal abdominal aortic wall. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2009, 131(2):21009-21011.
3. Baxter B.T., Terrin M.C., Dalman R.L. Medical management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 2008, 117(14):1883-1889.
4. Cardamone L., Valentin A., Eberth J.F., Humphrey J.D. Origin of axial prestretch and residual stress in arteries. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2009, 8(6):431-446.
5. Celi, S., Di Puccio, F., Forte, P., Berti, S., 2010. FE sensitivity analyses to estimate the role of the thrombus in an aortic aneurysm. In: Proceedings of the 17th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics (ESB).
6. Elger D.F., Blackketter D.M., Budwig R.S., Johansen K.H. The Influence of shape on the stress in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1996, 118:326-332.
7. Ferruzzi J., Vorp D.A., Humphrey J.D. On constitutive descriptors of the biaxial mechanical behaviour of human abdominal aorta and aneurysms. Journal of Royal Society Interface 2011, 8(56):435-450.
8. Fillinger M.F., Raghavan M.L., Marra S.P., Cronenwett J.L., Kennedy F.E. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2002, 36(3):589-597.
9. Fillinger M.F., Marra S.P., Raghavan M.L., Kennedy F.E. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2003, 37(4):724-732.
10. Hall A.J., Busse E.F.G., McCarville D.J., Burgess J.J. Aortic wall tension as a predictive factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture: improving the selection of patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Annals of Vascular Surgery 2000, 14(2):152-157.
11. Holzapfel G.A., Gasser T.C., Ogden R.W. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. Journal of Elasticity 2000, 61(1):1-48.
12. Holzapfel G.A., Sommer G., Auer M., Regitnig P., Ogden R.W. Layer-specific 3D residual deformations of human aortas with non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2007, 35(4):530-545.
13. Holzapfel G.A., Ogden R.W. Constitutive modelling of arteries. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science 2010, 466(2118):1551-1596.
14. Lederle F.A., Wilson S.E., Johnson G.R., Reinke D.B., Littooy F.N., Acher C.W., Ballard D.J., et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. New England Journal of Medicine 2002, 346(19):1437-1444.
15. Ogden R.W., Saccomandi G., Sgura I. Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data. Computational Mechanics 2004, 34(6):484-502.
16. Rissland P., Alemu Y., Einav S., Ricotta J., Bluestein D. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2009, 131(3):31001-31010.
17. Rodriguez J.F., Ruìz C., Doblaré M., Holzapfel G.A. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2008, 130:1-10.
18. Rodriguez J.F., Martufi G., Doblaré M., Finol E.A. The effect of material model formulation in the stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2009, 37:2218-2221.
19. Schmid H., Nash M.P., Young A.A., Rohrle O., Hunter P.J. A computationally efficient optimization kernel for material parameter estimation procedures. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2007, 129(2):279-283.
20. Schmid H., Watton P.N., Maurer M.M., Wimmer J., Winkler P., Wang Y.K., Rohrle O., Itskov M. Impact of transmural heterogeneities on arterial adaptation. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2009, 9(3):295-315.
21. The Uk Small Aneurysm Trial Participants, 2002. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. New England Journal of Medicine 346, 1445-1452.
22. Truijers M., Pol J.A., SchultzeKool L.J., van Sterkenburg S.M., Fillinger M.F., Blankensteijn J.D. Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2007, 33(4):401-407.
23. Vande Geest J.P., Sacks M.S., Vorp D.A. Age dependency of the biaxial biomechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2004, 126(6):815-822.
24. Vande Geest J.P., Sacks M.S., Vorp D.A. The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39(7):1324-1334.
25. Vande Geest, J.P., Schmidt, D.E., Sacks, M.S., Vorp, D.A., 2008. The Effects of Anisotropy on the Stress Analyses of Patient-Specific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 36 (6, 4), 921-932.
26. Venkatasubramaniam A.K., Fagan M.J., Mehta T., Mylankal K.J., Ray B., Kuhan G., Chetter I.C., McCollum P.T. A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2004, 28(2):168-176.
27. Vorp D.A. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of biomechanics 2007, 40(9):1887-1902.
28. Wicker B.K., Hutchens H.P., Wu Q., Yeh A.T., Humphrey J.D. Normal basilar artery structure and biaxial mechanical behaviour. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2008, 11(5):539-551.
29. Xu, J., Kochanek, K.D., Murphy, S.L., Tejada-Vera, B., 2010. Deaths: Final Data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58, 19, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.