Cell adhesion and detachment on gold surfaces modified with a thiol-functionalized RGD peptide

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 30, 2011, Pages 7286-7296

  Yoon, Sang Hee ^a,b   Mofrad, Mohammad R K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cell detachment; Electrochemistry; Gold; Polyethylene glycol; Thiol functionalized arginine glycine aspartic acid (RGD) peptide

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION POTENTIAL; ANCHORAGE-DEPENDENT CELLS; ARGININE-GLYCINE-ASPARTIC ACIDS; CELL DETACHMENT; CELL SHAPES; CELLULAR ADHESION; CELLULAR DYNAMICS; DYNAMIC NATURE; EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION; GEOMETRIC SHAPE; GOLD SURFACES; IN-VIVO; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MECHANOCHEMICALS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL; QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERIZATION; RGD PEPTIDE; SUB-CELLULAR;

ANCHORAGES (FOUNDATIONS); ARGININE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; DESORPTION; GLYCOLS; GOLD; ORGANIC ACIDS; PEPTIDES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS; SURFACES;

ADHESION;

GLYCINE AMIDINOTRANSFERASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CELL ANCHORAGE; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CONTACT ANGLE; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLAST; GEOMETRY; GOLD STANDARD; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; FIBROBLASTS; GOLD; MICE; NIH 3T3 CELLS; OLIGOPEPTIDES; SULFHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 80051545921     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.077     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Geiger B., Bershadsky A., Pankov R., Yamada K.M. Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2(11):793-805.
2. Park T.H., Shuler M.L. Integration of cell culture and microfabricationtechnology. BiotechnolProg 2003, 19(2):243-253.
3. Ridley A.J., Schwartz M.A., Burridge K., Firtel R.A., Ginsberg M.H., Borisy G., et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 2003, 302(5651):1704-1709.
4. Beningo K.A., Dembo M., Kaverina I., Small J.V., Wang Y.L. Nascent focal adhesions are responsible for the generation of strong propulsive forces in migrating fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 2001, 153(4):881-888.
5. Zamir E., Geiger B. Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. J Cell Sci 2001, 114(20):3583-3590.
6. Galbraith C.G., Yamada K.M., Sheetz M.P. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 2002, 159(4):695-705.
7. Wiesner S., Legate K.R., Fässler R. Integrin-actin interactions. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005, 62(10):1081-1099.
8. Bershadsky A., Kozlov M., Geiger B. Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. CurrOpin Cell Biol 2006, 18(5):472-481.
9. Palecek S.P., Loftus J.C., Ginsberg M.H., Lauffenburger D.A., Horwitz A.F. Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness. Nature 1997, 385(6616):537-540.
10. Clark P., Connolly P., Curtis A.S., Dow J.A., Wilkinson C.D. Topographical control of cell behavior.I. Simple Step Cues Dev 1987, 99(3):439-448.
11. Chehroudi B., Gould T.R., Brunette D.M. Titanium-coated micromachinedgrooves of different dimensions affectepithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. J Biomed Mater ResA 1990, 24(9):1203-1219.
12. Lussi J.W., Tang C., Kuenzi P.-A., Staufer U., Csucs G., Vörös J., et al. Selective molecular assembly patterning at the nanoscale: a novel platform for producing protein patterns by electron-beam lithography on SiO2/indium tin oxide-coated glass substrates. Nanotechnology 2005, 16(9):1781-1786.
13. Lee K.-B., Park S.J., Mirkin C.A., Smith J.C., Mrksich M. Protein nanoarrays generated by dip-pen nanolithography. Science 2002, 295(5560):1702-1705.
14. Hoff J.D., Cheng L.-J., Meyhöfer E., Guo L.J., Hunt A.J. Nanoscale protein patterning by imprint lithography. Nano Lett 2004, 4(5):853-857.
15. Chen C.S., Mrksich M., Huang S., Whitesides G.M., Ingber D.E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997, 276(5317):1425-1428.
16. Lee N.Y., Lim J.R., Kim Y.S. Selective patterning and immobilization of biomolecules within precisely-defined micro-reservoirs. BiosensBioelectron 2006, 21(11):2188-2193.
17. Folch A., Jo B.H., Hurtado O., Beebe D.J., Toner M. Microfabricated elastomeric stencils for micropatterning cell cultures. J Biomed Mater ResA 2000, 52(2):346-353.
18. Roth E.A., Xu T., Das M., Gregory C., Hickman J.J., Boland T. Inkjet printing for high-throughput cell patterning. Biomaterials 2004, 25(17):3707-3715.
19. Birkbeck A.L., Flynn R.A., Ozkan M., Song D., Gross M. Esener SC.VCSEL arrays as micromanipulators in chip-based biosystems. Biomed Microdevices 2003, 5(1):47-54.
20. Ozkan M., Pisanic T., Scheel J., Barlow C., Esener S., Bhatia S.N. Electro-optical platform for the manipulation of live cells. Langmuir 2003, 19(5):1532-1538.
21. Rosenthal A., Voldman J. Dielectrophoretic traps for single-particle patterning. Biophys J 2005, 88(3):2193-2205.
22. Lahann J., Mitragotri S., Tran T.-N., Kaido H., Sundaram J., Choi I.S., et al. A reversibly switching surface. Science 2003, 299(5605):371-374.
23. Truskey G.A., Pirone J.S. The effect of fluid shear stress upon cell adhesion to fibronectin-treated surfaces. J Biomed Mater ResA 1990, 24(10):1333-1353.
24. van Kooten T.G., Schakenraad J.M., van der Mei H.C., Dekker A., Kirkpatrick C.J., Busscher H.J. Fluid shear induced endothelial cell detachment from glass-influence of adhesion time and shear stress. Med EngPhys 1994, 16(6):506-512.
25. García A.J., Huber F., Boettiger D. Force required to break α5β1 integrin-fibronectin bonds in intact adherent cells is sensitive to integrin activation state. J BiolChem 1998, 273(18):10988-10993.
26. Cargill R.S.I.I., Dee K.C., Malcolm S. An assessment of the strength of NG108-15 cell adhesion to chemically modified surfaces. Biomaterials 1999, 20(23-24):2417-2425.
27. Kuo S.C., Lauffenburger D.A. Relationship between receptor/ligand binding affinity and adhesion strength. Biophys J 1993, 65(5):2191-2200.
28. Kuo S.C., Hammer D.A., Lauffenburger D.A. Simulation of detachment of specifically bound particles from surfaces by shear flow. Biophys J 1997, 73(1):517-531.
29. Goldstein A.S., DiMilla P.A. Effect of adsorbed fibronectin concentration on cell adhesion and deformation under shear on hydrophobic surfaces. J Biomed Mater ResA 2002, 59(4):665-675.
30. McClay D.R., Wessel G.M. Marchase RB.Intercellular recognition: quantitation of initial binding events. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 1981, 78(8):4975-4979.
31. Lotz M.M., Burdsal C.A., Erickson H.P., McClay D.R. Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response. J Cell Biol 1989, 109(4):1795-1805.
32. Burdsal C.A., Alliegro M.C., McClay D.R. Tissue-specific, temporal changes in cell adhesion to echinonectin in the sea urchin embryo. DevBiol 1991, 144(2):327-334.
33. Burdsal C.A., Lotz M.M., Miller J., McClay D.R. A quantitative switch in integrin expression accompanies differentiation of F9 cells treated with retinoic acid. DevDyn 1994, 201(4):344-353.
34. Sung K.L., Sung L.A., Crimmins M., Burakoff S.J., Chien S. Determination of junction avidity of cytolytic T cell and target cell. Science 1986, 234(4782):1405-1408.
35. Evans E., Ritchie K., Merkel R. Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. Biophys J 1995, 68(6):2580-2587.
36. Shao J.-Y., Hochmuth R.M. Micropipette suction for measuring piconewton forces of adhesion and tether formation from neutrophil membranes. Biophys J 1996, 71(5):2892-2901.
37. Richards R.G., ap Gwynn I., Bundy K.J., Rahn B.A. Microjet impingement followed by scanning electron microscopy as a qualitative technique to compare cellular adhesion to various biomaterials. Cell BiolInt. 1995, 19(12):1015-1024.
38. Jiang X., Bruzewicz D.A., Wong A.P., Piel M., Whitesides G.M. Directing cell migration with asymmetric micropatterns. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 2005, 102(4):975-978.
39. Inaba R., Khademhosseini A., Suzuki H., Fukuda J. Electrochemical desorption of self-assembled monolayers for engineering cellular tissues. Biomaterials 2009, 30(21):3573-3579.
40. Guillaume-Gentil O., Gabi M., Zenobi-Wong M., Vörös J. Electrochemically switchable platformfor the micro-patterning and release of heterotypic cell sheets. Biomed Microdevices 2011, 13(1):221-230.
41. Karp G. Cell and molecular biology: concepts and experiments 2005, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
42. Dalton B.A., Walboomers X.F., Dziegielewski M., Evans M.D., Taylor S., Jansen J.A., et al. Modulation of epithelial tissue and cell migration by microgrooves. J Biomed Mater Res A 2001, 56(2):195-207.
43. Yoon S.-H., Lee C., Mofrad M.R.K. Viscoelastic characterization of the retracting cytoskeleton using subcellular detachment. ApplPhysLett 2011, 98(13):133701.
44. Haga H., Sasaki S., Kawabata K., Ito E., Ushiki T., Sambongi T. Elasticity mapping of living fibroblasts by AFM and immunofluorescence observation of cytoskeleton. Ultramicroscopy 2000, 82(1-4):253-258.
45. Haga H., Nagayama M., Kawabata K. Imaging mechanical properties of living cells by scanning probe microscopy. CurrNanosci 2007, 3(1):97-103.
46. Mofrad M.R.K. Rheology of the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2009, 41:433-453.
47. Jamali Y., Azimi M., Mofrad M.R.K. A sub-cellular viscoelastic model for cell population mechanics. PLoS One 2010, 5(8):e12097.
48. Lee S.E., Chunsrivirot S., Kamm R.D., Mofrad M.R.K. Molecular dynamics study of talin-vinculin binding. Biophys J 2008, 95(4):2027-2036.
49. Golji J., Mofrad M.R.K. A molecular dynamics investigation of vinculin activation. Biophys J 2010, 99(4):1073-1081.
50. Golji J., Lam J., Mofrad M.R.K. Vinculin activation is necessary for complete talin binding. Biophys J 2011, 100(2):332-340.
51. Bao G., Kamm R.D., Thomas W., Hwang W., Fletcher D.A., Grodzinsky A.J., et al. Molecular biomechanics: the molecular basis of how forces regulate cellular function. Mol Cell Biomech 2010, 3(2):91-105.
52. Mofrad M.R.K., Kamm R.D. Cellular mechanotransduction: diverse perspectives from molecules to tissues 2010, Cambridge University Press, New York.