A multi-resolution framework for Information Extraction from free text

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 592-599

  Maslennikov, Mstislav ^a   Chua, Tat Seng ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY RELATION; FREE TEXTS; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; MULTI-RESOLUTIONS; STATISTICAL CORRELATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 80051537809     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. P. Cimiano and U. Reyle. 2003. Ontology-based semantic construction, underspecification and disambiguation. In Proc of the Prospects and Advances in the Syntax-Semantic Interface Workshop.
2. P. Cimiano, U. Reyle and J. Saric. 2005. Ontology-driven discourse analysis for information extraction. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55(1):59-83.
3. H.L. Chieu and H.T. Ng. 2002. A Maximum Entropy Approach to Information Extraction from Semi-Structured and Free Text. In Proc of AAAI-2002.
4. F. Ciravegna. 2001. Adaptive Information Extraction from Text by Rule Induction and Generalization. In Proc of IJCAI-2001.
5. A. Culotta and J. Sorensen J. 2004. Dependency tree kernels for relation extraction. In Proc of ACL-2004.
6. A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39(1):1-38.
7. B. Grosz and C. Sidner. 1986. Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
8. M. Halliday and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Longman, London.
9. D. Lin. 1997. Dependency-based Evaluation of Minipar. In Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing systems.
10. M. Maslennikov, H.K. Goh and T.S. Chua. 2006. ARE: Instance Splitting Strategies for Dependency Relation-based Information Extraction. In Proc of ACL-2006.
11. E. Miltsakaki. 2003. The Syntax-Discourse Interface: Effects of the Main-Subordinate Distinction on Attention Structure. PhD thesis.
12. M.F. Moens and R. De Busser. 2002. First steps in building a model for the retrieval of court decisions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(5):429-446.
13. S. Pradhan, W. Ward, K. Hacioglu, J. Martin and D. Jurafsky. 2004. Shallow Semantic Parsing using Support Vector Machines. In Proc of HLT/NAACL-2004.
14. E. Riloff, J. Wiebe, and W. Phillips. 2005. Exploiting Subjectivity Classification to Improve Information Extraction. In Proc of AAAI-2005.
15. S. Soderland. 1999. Learning Information Extraction Rules for Semi-Structured and Free Text. Machine Learning, 34:233-272.
16. R. Soricut and D. Marcu. 2003. Sentence Level Discourse Parsing using Syntactic and Lexical Information. In Proc of HLT/NAACL.
17. M. Surdeanu, S. Harabagiu, J. Williams, P. Aarseth. 2003. Using Predicate Arguments Structures for Information Extraction. In Proc of ACL-2003.
18. M. Taboada and W. Mann. 2005. Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Discourse studies, 8(4).
19. B. Webber, M. Stone, A. Joshi and A. Knott. 2002. Anaphora and Discourse Structure. Computational Linguistics, 29(4).
20. J. Xiao, T.S. Chua and H. Cui. 2004. Cascading Use of Soft and Hard Matching Pattern Rules for Weakly Supervised Information Extraction. In Proc of COLING-2004.
21. M. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Su and G. Zhou. 2006. A Composite Kernel to Extract Relations between Entities with both Flat and Structured Features. In Proc of ACL-2006.
22. G. Zhou, J. Su and M. Zhang. 2006. Modeling Commonality among Related Classes in Relation Extraction. In Proc of ACL-2006.