Observational studies and STROBE reporting quality in plastic surgical conference abstracts

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Knobloch, Karsten ^a   Yoon, Uzung ^a   Vogt, Peter M ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATION; ORGANIZATION; PLASTIC SURGERY; UNITED STATES;

CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; OBSERVATION; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SURGERY, PLASTIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80051534827     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821ef408     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Chung KC, Swanson JA, Schmitz D, Sullivan D, Rohrich RJ. Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1385-1389.
2. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:681-684. (Pubitemid 43833495)
3. Song JW, Chung KC. Observational studies: Cohort and casecontrol studies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2234-2242.
4. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-1457.