ERJ peer reviewers: Does this pillar of the Journal's quality need help?

European Respiratory Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 251-252

  Migliori, G B ^a   Soriano, J B ^c   Brusasco, V ^b   Dinh Xuan, A T ^d  

^a IRCCS   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^c CIMERA   (Spain)

^d Institut Cochin   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; WRITING;

MANUSCRIPTS AS TOPIC; PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 80051520494     PISSN: 09031936     EISSN: 13993003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00093411     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Dinh-Xuan AT, Brusasco V. The ERJ in its 21st year of age: a smooth transition for an everlasting evolution. Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 1-2.
2. Siafakas NM. The European Respiratory Society, 1990-2010: a 20-year anniversary story of success. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 1-2.
3. Dinh-Xuan AT, Brusasco V. Refining the changes. Or, how to modify the shape, not the spirit. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 1.
4. Campion EW, Drazen JM. Peer review journals in the digital age. Arch Bronconeumol 2010; 46: 569-570.
5. Curfman GD, Morrissey S, Annas GJ, et al. Peer review in the balance. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2276-2277. (Pubitemid 351724459)
6. List of reviewers. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 728-734.
7. Eickelberg O, Laurent G, Nicod LP, et al. European Respiratory Society MD PhD programme in respiratory science. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 229-230.
8. van Rooyen S, Delamothe T, Evans SJ. Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 341: c5729.