Is "X"-WAS the future for all of epidemiology?

Epidemiology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 457-459

  Fallin, Margaret Daniele ^a   Kao, W H Linda ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIETARY INTAKE; ENVIRONMENT; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMAN; NOTE; NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS;

EID: 80051496148     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821d3a9f     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Ioannidis J, Tarone R, McLaughlin JK. The false-positive to falsenegative ratio in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2011;22:460-463.
2. Patel CJ, Bhattacharya J, Butte AJ. An Environment-Wide Association Study (EWAS) on type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10746.
3. National Human Genome Institute, National Institutes of Health. Genome-Wide Association Studies. Available at: www.genome.gov/20119523. Accessed 29 March 2011.
4. Green ED, Guyer MS. National Human Genome Research Institute. Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside. Nature. 2011;470:204-213.