The guy's stone scoregrading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures

Urology

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 277-281

  Thomas, Kay ^a,b   Smith, Naomi C ^a   Hegarty, Nicholas ^a   Glass, Jonathan M ^a  

^a GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DIVERTICULOSIS; FEMALE; FEVER; GUYS STONE SCORE; HEARING LOSS; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; INFECTION; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINA BIFIDA; SPINE INJURY; STAGHORN STONE; STONE ANALYSIS; STONE FORMATION; SURGEON; URINE RETENTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051473213     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. I. Fernstrom, and B. Johannson Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique Scand J Urol Nephrol 10 1976 257 259 (Pubitemid 8001412)
2. C. Turk, T. Knoll, and A. Petrik Guidelines on urolithiasis Eur Assoc Urol 2010 1 128
3. M. Morgan, N.S. Smith, and K. Thomas Is Clavien the new standard for reporting urological complications? BJU Int 104 2009 434 436
4. A. Tefekli, M. Ali-Karadag, and K. Tepeler Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard Eur Urol 53 2008 184 190 (Pubitemid 350166715)
5. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, and P.A. Clavien Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of a 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 2004 205 213 (Pubitemid 38963009)
6. M.S. Michel, L. Trojan, and J.J. Rassweiler Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy Eur Urol 51 2007 899 906 (Pubitemid 46281422)
7. J. de la Rosette, J. Rioja-Zuazu, and P. Tsakiris Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification J Urol 180 2008 2489 2493
8. The British Association of Urological Surgeons PCNL Audit 2007 http://www.baus.org.uk/Resources/BAUS/Documents/PDF%20Documents/Sections/ Endourology/PCNL%20Audit%202007.pdf Accessed June 7, 2010
9. M. De Sio, G. Autorino, and F. Quarto Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial Eur Urol 54 2008 196 203
10. J.J. Rassweiler, C. Renner, and F. Eisenberger The management of complex renal stones BJU Int 86 2000 919 928
11. B. Turna, M. Umul, and S. Demiryoguran How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 21 2007 34 43
12. P.J. Olbert, A. Hegele, and A.J. Schrader Pre- and peri-operative predictors of short term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy Urol Res 35 2007 225 230
13. H.G. Tiselius, and A. Andersson Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol 43 2003 275 281 (Pubitemid 36314240)
14. A.R. El Nahas, A.A. Shokeir, and A.M. El-Assemy Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive haemorrhage: a study of risk factors J Urol 177 2007 576 579 (Pubitemid 46054023)
15. A.Y. Muslumanoglu, A. Tefekli, and M.A. Karadag Impact of percutaneous access point number and location on complication and success rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy Urol Int 77 2006 340 346 (Pubitemid 44837004)
16. R. Kukreja, M. Desai, and S. Patel Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study J Endourol 18 2004 715 722 (Pubitemid 39441759)
17. American Society of Anesthesiologists New classification of physical status Anesthesiology 24 1963 111
18. G. Copeland, D. Jones, and M. Walters POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical audit Br J Surg 78 1991 355 360
19. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Testing changes www.ihi.org/IHI/ Topics/Improvement/ImprovementMethods/HowToImprove/testingchanges.htm Accessed July 21, 2010
20. O'Brien T, Viney R, Doherty A, et al. Why don't Mercedes Benz publish randomised trials? BJU Int;105:293-297.
21. D.J. Culkin, J.S. Wheeler, and B.A. Nemchausky Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the spinal cord injury population J Urol 136 1986 1181 1183 (Pubitemid 17189177)
22. S. Symons, C.S. Biyani, and S. Bhargava Challenge of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal neuropathy Int J Urol 13 2006 874 879 (Pubitemid 44049909)
23. R.L. Brennan, and D.J. Prediger Coefficient kappa: some uses, misuses, and alternatives Educ Psychol Meas 41 1981 687 699
24. J.R. Landis, and G.G. Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1977 159 174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
25. J.J. de la Rosette, M.P. Laguna, and J.J. Rassweiler Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomya critical review Eur Urol 54 2008 994 1003
26. D. Allen, T. O'Brien, and R. Tiptaft Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 19 2005 279 282 (Pubitemid 40656297)
27. S.R. Patel, G.E. Haleblian, and G. Pareek Percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be safely performed in the high risk patient Urology 75 2010 51 55
28. A. Bagrodia, A. Gupta, and J.D. Raman Predictors of cost and clinical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Urol 182 2009 586 590
29. M.K. Ferguson, and A.E. Durkin A comparison of three scoring systems for predicting complications after major lung resection Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23 2003 35 42 (Pubitemid 35472094)
30. K. Kanao, J. Nakashima, and K. Nakagawa Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy J Urol 176 2006 1453 1457 (Pubitemid 44307244)