Reactions to participating in dating violence research: Are our questions distressing participants?

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Volumn 26, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 2890-2907

  Shorey, Ryan C ^a   Cornelius, Tara L ^b   Bell, Kathryn M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

aggression; dating; research ethics; violence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COURTSHIP; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; VICTIM;

ADULT; COURTSHIP; CRIME VICTIMS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPOUSE ABUSE; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79961230935     PISSN: 08862605     EISSN: 15526518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0886260510390956     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Campbell, R., Adams, A.E., Wasco, S.M., Ahrens, C.E., & Sefl, T. (2010). "What has it been like for you to talk with me today?": The impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors. Violence Against Women, 16, 60-83.
2. Carter-Visscher, R.M., Naugle, A.E., Bell, K.M., & Suvak, M.K. (2007). Ethics of asking trauma-related questions and exposing participants to arousal-inducing stimuli. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 8, 27-55.
3. Cornelius, T.L., Shorey, R.C., & Beebe, S.M. (2010). Self-reported communication variables and dating violence: Using Gottman's martial communication conceptualization. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 439-448.
4. Cornelius, T.L., Sullivan, K.T., Wyngarden, N., & Milliken, J.C. (2009). Participation in prevention programs for dating violence: Beliefs about relationship violence and intention to participate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1057-1078.
5. Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
6. DePrince, A.P., & Chu, A. (2008). Perceived benefits of trauma research: Examining methodological and individual difference factors in responses to research participation. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1556, 35-47.
7. Griffin, M.G., Resick, P.A., Waldrop, A.E., & Mechanic, M.B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 221-227.
8. Hines, D.A., & Saudino, K.J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale. Violence and Victims, 18, 197-217.
9. Hirshon, J.M., Krugman, S.D., Witting, M.D., Furuno, J.P., Limcangco, M.R., Perisse, A.R., & Rasch, E.K. (2002). Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1417-1420.
10. Jackson, S.M., Cram, F., & Seymour, F.W. (2000). Violence and sexual coercion in high school students' dating relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 23-36.
11. Johnson, L.E., & Benight, C.C. (2003). Effects of trauma-focused research on recent domestic violence survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 567-571.
12. Johnson, M.P., & Leone, J.M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322-349.
13. Kaura, S.A., & Lohman, B.J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: A comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 367-381.
14. Logan, T.L., Walker, R., Shannon, L., & Cole, J. (2008). Combining ethical considerations with recruitment and follow-up strategies for partner violence victimization research. Violence Against Women, 14, 1226-1251.
15. Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D.G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 383-394.
16. Newman, E., Willard, T., Sinclair, R., & Kaloupek, D. (2001). Empirically supported ethical research practice: The costs and benefits of research from the participants' views. Accountability in Research, 8, 309-329.
17. Resick, P.A., Iverson, K.M., & Artz, C.E. (2009). Participant reactions to a pretreatment research assessment during a treatment outcome study for PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22, 316-319.
18. Rhatigan, D.L., & Street, A.E. (2005). The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships: A test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1580-1597.
19. Shorey, R.C., Cornelius, T.L., & Bell, K.M. (2008). A critical review of theoretical frameworks for dating violence: Comparing the dating and marital fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 185-194.
20. Smith, P.H., White, J.W., & Holland, L.J. (2003). A longitudinal perspective on dating violence among adolescent and college-age women. Journal of American Public Health Association, 93, 1104-1109.
21. Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D.B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
22. White, J.W., & Smith, P.H. (2009). Covariaiton in the use of physical and seuxal intimate partner aggression among adolescent college-age men: A longitudinal analysis. Violence Against Women, 15, 24-43.
23. Wolfe, D.A., Wekerle, C., Scott, K., Straatman, A.L., Grasley, C., & Jaffe, D.R. (2003). Dating violence prevention with at-risk youth: A controlled outcome evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 279-291.