Progress in the diagnostics of mental models

Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 81-101

  Al Diban, Sabine ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mental models; Structure isomorphism; Test of causal models; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961230349     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76898-4_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Al-Diban, S. (2002). Diagnose mentaler Modelle. Hamburg: Kovac.
2. Birkhoff, G. (1973). Lattice theory. 3th ed. American Mathematic Society Coll. Publ. 25: Providence, R.I.
3. Caravita, S. (2001) A re-framed conceptual change theory? Learning and Instruction 11, 421429.
4. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive Apprenticeship. Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Funke, J. (1990). Systemmerkmale als Determinanten des Umgangs mit dynamischen Systemen. Sprache & Kognition, 9(3), 143-153.
6. Funke, J. (1992). Wissen über dynamische Systeme: Erwerb, Repräsentation und Anwendung. Heidelberg: Springer.
7. Ganter, B., & Wille, R. (1996). Formale Begriffsanalyse. Mathematische Grundlagen. Berlin: Springer.
8. Greeno, J.G. (1989). Situations, mental models and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr, & K. Kotovsky (Eds.) Complex information processing (pp. 285-318). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Hacker, W., Sachse, P., & Schroda, F. (1998). Design thinking-possible ways to successful solutions in product development. In H. Birkhofer, P. Badke-Schaub & E. Frankenberger (Eds.) Designer - the key to successful Product Development. London: Springer.
10. Lazarsfeld, P.F., & Barton, A.H. (1955). Das Verhältnis von theoretischer und empirischer Analyse im Rahmen qualitativer Sozialforschung. In Ch. Hopf, & E. Weingarten (Eds.), Qualitative Sozialforschung. Stuttgart: Klett.
11. Mayring, P. (1997). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse-Grundlagen und Techniken (Vol. 6). Weinheim. Beltz: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
12. Nägler, G., & Stopp, F. (1996). Graphen und ihre Anwendungen. Mathematik für Ingenieure und Naturwissenschaftler. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.
13. Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principles teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183-200.
14. Reynolds, R.E., Sinatra, G.M., & Jetton, T.L. (1996). Views of knowledge acquisition and representation: A continuum from experience centered to mind centered. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 93-104.
15. Rost, J. (1996). Lehrbuch Testtheorie Testkonstruktion. Bern: Huber.
16. Scheele, B., & Groeben, N. (1988). Dialog-Konsens-Methoden zur Rekonstruktion subjektiver Theorien. Die Heidelberger Struktur-Lege-Technik (SLT), konsensuale Ziel-Mittel-Argumentation und kommunikative Flussdiagramm-Beschreibung von Handlungen. Tübingen: Francke Verlag.
17. Seel, N. M. (1991). Weltwissen und mentale Modelle. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag.
18. Seel, N. M. (2003). Model-centered learning and instruction. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(1), 59-85.
19. Seel, N.M., Al-Diban, S., & Blumschein, P. (2000). Mental models and instructional planning. In J.M. Spector, & T.M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 129-158). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Seel, N.M., Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2007, i.p.). Mental models and problem solving: Technological solutions for measurement and assessment of the development of expertise. In J. Strobel, D. Jonassen, & W. Hung (Eds.) Learning by modelling systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Stark, R. (2003). Conceptual Change - kognitiv oder situiert? Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17(2), 133 - 144.
22. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502.