From gift to waste: Changing policies in biobanking practices

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 510-520

  Tupasela, Aaro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; MEDICINE; POLICY STRATEGY; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 79961229887     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234211X12960315268056     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allardt, Erik 1995.Kansallinen innovaatiojärjestelmä teknologiapolitiikan ystävänä ja tiedepolitiikan haittana. Tieteessä tapahtuu, 13(4), 5-9. [Transl: The national innovation system as friend of technology policy and foe of science policy]
2. Allardt, Erik 1998. Teknologiaretoriikka uomalaisen todellisuuden konstruoimisen välineenä. Tiede & Edistys, 2(2), 85-95. [Transl: Technology rhetoric as a tool for constructing Finnish reality]
3. Anderlik, Mary R and Mark A Rothstein 2001. Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information: what rules for the new science? Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2, 401-433.
4. Anderson, Robert, Michael Balls, M Danny Burke, Marie Cummins, Deirdre Fehily et al. 2001. The establishment of human research tissue banking in the UK and several Western European countries. ATLA, 29(2), 125-134.
5. Andrews, Lori and Dorothy Nelkin 2001. The Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue in the Biotechnology Age. New York: Crown Publishers.
6. Arrow, Kenneth J 1972. Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(4), 343-362.
7. BBMRI 2008. Biobanking and biomolecular resource research infrastructure. Available at http://www.biobanks.eu/, last accessed 9 September 2008.
8. Birch, Kean 2009. The knowledge-space dynamic in the UK bioeconomy. Area, 41(3), 273-284.
9. Boyle, James 1996. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bryant, R J, R F Harrison, R D Start, A S A Chetwood, A M Chesshire, M W R Reed and S S Cross 2008. Ownership and uses of human tissue: what are the opinions of surgical in-patients? Journal of Clinical Pathology, 61(3), 322-326.
11. Cooper, Melinda 2008. Life as Surplus. Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
12. Council of Europe 2006. Recommendation Rec(2006)4 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on Research on Biological Materials of Human Origin. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2006 at the 958th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies. Available at https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=977859, last accessed 28 June 2011.
13. Davoudi, Simin 2000. Planning for waste management: changing discourses and institutional relationships. Progress in Planning, 53(3), 165-216.
14. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2004.
15. Directive 2004/23/EC on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union, 31.3.2004.
16. Douglas, Conor 2005. Managing huge expectations: rhetorical strategies in human genome epidemiology. Science Studies, 18(2), 26-45.
17. ESHG (European Society of Human Genetics) 2003. Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: technical, social and ethical issues. European Journal of Human Genetics, 11(Suppl 2), 8-10.
18. European Commission 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
19. European Commission 2002. Science and Society - Action Plan. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
20. EU Workshop 2003. Biobanks for Health - Optimising the Use of European Biobanks and Health Registries for Research Relevant to Public Health and Combating Disease. Report and recommendations from an EU Workshop held 28-31 January 2003, Oslo, Norway.
21. Fletcher, Amy L 2004. Field of genes: the politics of science and identity in the Estonian genome project. New Genetics and Society, 23(1), 3-14.
22. Gottweis, Herbert 1998. Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Haimes, Erica and Micheal Whong-Barr 2004. Levels and styles of participation in genetic databases: a case study of the North Cumbria Community Genetics Project, pp 57-77. In Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA, R Tutton and O Corrigan (eds.). Routledge, London.
24. Hardy, John and Andrew Singleton 2009. Genomewide association studies and disease. New England Journal of Medicine,360(17), 1759-1768.
25. Häyrinen-Alestalo, Marja and Ulla Peltola 2006. The problem of a market-oriented university. Higher Education, 52(2), 251-281.
26. Hoeyer, Klaus 2006. The power of ethics. A case study from Sweden on the social life of moral concerns in policy processes. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28(6), 785-801.
27. Jackson, Steven J, P N Edwards, G C Bowker and C P Knobel 2007. Understanding infrastructure: history, heuristics, and cyberinfrastructure policy. First Monday, 12(6). Available at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_6/, last accessed 31 May 2010.
28. Kettunen, Pauli 2001. The nordic welfare state in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of History, 26(3), 225-247.
29. Kraft, Peter and David J Hunter 2009. Genetic risk prediction-are we there yet? New England Journal of Medicine, 360(17), 1701-1703.
30. Lounsbury, Michael, Marc Ventresca and Paul M Hirsch 2003.
31. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-economic Review, 1(1), 71-104.
32. Manson, Neil C and Onara O'Neil 2007. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Mauss, Marcel 2004[1954]. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London, Routledge.
34. Mayrhofer, Michaela and Barbara Prainsack 2009. Being a member of the club: the transnational (self-)governance of biobank networks. Special issue on Inclusive risk governance. International Journal on Risk Assessment and Management, 12(1), 64-81.
35. Miettinen, Reijo 2002. National Innovation System. Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric? Helsinki: Edita.
36. Myers, Greg 1991. Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In C Bazerman and J Paradis (eds.) Textual Dynamics of the Profession: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, pp 45-75.Madison,WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
37. Nelkin, Dorothy and Lori Andrews 1998. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology. Hastings Center Report, 28(5), 30-39.
38. OECD 2001. Biological Resource Centres: Underpinning the Future of Life Sciences and Biotechnology. Paris:OECD.
39. Orr, Samantha, Eliane Alexandre, Brain Clark, Robert Combes, Lueder M Fels et al. 2002. The establishment of a network of European human research tissue banks. Cell and Tissue Banking, 3(2), 133-137.
40. Parry, Bronwyn 2004. Trading the Genome: Investigating the Commodification of Bio-information. New York: Columbia University Press.
41. Porter, Richard C 2002. The Economics of Waste. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
42. Sihvo, S, K Snell, A Tupasela, P Jallinoja, A R Aro, A Hämäläinen and E Hemminki 2007. Väestö, biopankit ja lääketieteellinen tutkimus. Suomalaisten suhtautuminen lääketieteellisten näytteiden käyttöön. STAKESin Työpapereita 18. [Transl: Population, biobanks and medical research: attitudes of Finns towards the use of medical tissue samples]
43. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö 2007. Biopankit, yhteinen etu. Ihmisperäisten näytekokoelmien hyödyntämistä selvittävän työryhmän loppuraportti. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 52. STM, Helsinki. [Transl: Biobanks, a common interest. Final report of the working group on human-based tissue collections]
44. Strong, Michael D 2000. The US Navy Tissue Bank: 50 years on the cutting edge. Cell and Tissue Banking, 1(1), 9-16.
45. Sunder Rajan, Kausit 2006. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46. Thompson, Michael 1979. Rubbish Theory: The Creation and Destruction of Value. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47. Titmuss, Richard 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
48. Tupasela, Aaro 2007. Re-examining medical modernization-framing the public in Finnish iomedical research policy. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 63-78.
49. Tupasela, Aaro 2010. Semantic interoperability and biobanking: the politics of setting technical standards in tissue economies. In Yearbook 2009 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology & Society, A Bammé, G Getzinger and B Wieser (eds.), pp 143-164. Munich and Vienna: Profil.
50. Tupasela, A, S Sihvo, K Snell, P Jallinoja, A R Aro and E Hemminki 2010. Attitudes towards the biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent and biobanks among Finns. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(1), 46-52.
51. Von Versen, Rüdiger 2000. Letter from the Editor. Cell and Tissue Banking 1(1), 1-3.
52. Waldby, Catherine 2002. Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 6(3), 305-323.
53. Waldby, Catherine and Robert Mitchell 2006. Tissue Economies: Gifts, Commodities, and Bio-value in Late Stage Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
54. Yuille, Martin, Gert-Jan van Ommen, Christian Bréchot, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Georges Dagher et al. 2007. Biobanking for Europe. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 9(1), 14-24.