Using concept maps to assess individuals and teams in collaborative learning environments

Handbook of Research on Collaborative Learning Using Concept Mapping

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 358-381

  Johnson, Tristan E ^a   Ifenthanler, Dirk ^b   Pirnay Dummer, Pablo N ^b   Spector, J Michael ^c  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961214297     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-992-2.ch018     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Baker, E. (1999, July). Technology: How do we know it works? Paper presented at the Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology, July 12-13, 1999, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/Technology/TechConf/1999/whitepapers/paper5.html.
2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How experts differ from novices. In How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (pp. 31-50). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (Eds.). (1998). Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Carnevale, A., Gainer, L., & Meltzer, A. (1989). Workplace basics: The skills employers want. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
5. Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151-173. doi:10.1518/001872000779656561
6. Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Kiekel, P. A., & Bell, B. (2004). Advances in measuring team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 83-106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Doyle, J. K., Radzicki, M. J., & Trees, W. S. (1998). Measuring Change in Mental Models of Dynamic Systems: An Exploratory Study.Unpub-lished manuscript.
8. Dummer, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2005). Planning and assessing navigation in model-centered learning environments. Why learners often do not follow the path laid out for them. In G. Chiazzese, M. Allegra, A. Chifari & S. Ottaviano (Eds.), Methods and technologies for learning (pp. 327-334). Boston: WIT Press.
9. Ellson, J., Gansner, E. R., Koutsofios, E., North, S. C., & Woodhull, G. (2003). GraphViz and Dynagraph. Static and dynamic graph drawing tools. Florham Park, NJ: AT&T Labs.
10. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2004). Why we need team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. xi, 268). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software, Practice & Experience, 21(11), 1129-1164. doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102
13. Ganser, E. R., & North, S. C. (1999). An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering. Software, Practice & Experience, 00(S1), 1-5.
14. Grotzer, T. A., & Perkins, D. N. (2000). A taxonomy of causal models: The conceptual leaps between models and students' reflections on them. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), New Orleans, LA, April 28-May 1, 2000.
15. Guzzo, R. A., & Salas, E. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision-making in organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
16. Hackman, R. A. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective team work. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
17. Harary, F. (1974). Graphentheorie. München, Germany: Oldenbourg.
18. Herl, H. E., O'Neil, H. F., Jr., Chung, G. L. W. K., Bianchi, C., Wang, S., Mayer, R., et al. (1999). Final report for validation of problem solving measures (CSE Technical Report 501). Los Angeles: CRESST.
19. Ifenthaler, D. (2006). Diagnosis of the learningdependent progression of mental models. Development of the SMD-Technology as a methodology for assessing individual models on relational, structural and semantic levels. Freiburg, Germany: Universitäts-Dissertation.
20. Ifenthaler, D. (2007). Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the AECT, Anaheim, CA.
21. Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., & Seel, N. M. (2008). Tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Paper presented at the AREA 2008, New York.
22. Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2005). The measurement of change: learning-dependent progression of mental models. Technology, Instruction. Cognition and Learning, 2(4), 317-336.
23. Janetzko, D. (1996) Knowledge Tracking. A Method to Analyze Cognitive Structures. Freiburg, Germany: IIG-Berichte 2.
24. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47-62. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47
25. Johnson, T. E., & O'Connor, D. L. (2008a). Assessment of group learning processes. In M. D. Merrill, van Merriënboer, J., Spector, J. M., & Driscoll, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3 Ed., pp. 776-783). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Johnson, T. E., & O'Connor, D. L. (2008b). Measuring team shared understanding using analysis constructed shared mental model methodology. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 1-23.
27. Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C., Hong, N., Harvey, D., & Peters, K. (1997). Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3/4), 289-308.
28. Karoly, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2004). The 21st century at work: Forces shaping the future workforce and workplace in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
29. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model - construct or metaphor. Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-437. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90021-3
30. Langan-Fox, J., Anglim, J., & Wilson, J. R. (2004). Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(4), 331-352. doi:10.1002/hfm.20004
31. Langan-Fox, J., Code, S., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2000). Team mental models: Techniques, methods, and analytic approaches. Human Factors, 42(2), 242-271. doi:10.1518/001872000779656534
32. Maedche, A., Pekar, V., & Staab, S. (2002) Ontology learning part one - on discovering taxonomic relations from the web. In Proceedings of the Web Intelligence Conference, (pp. 301-322). Berlin: Springer.
33. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
34. Milrad, M., Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2002). Model facilitated learning. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and Teaching with Technology: Principles and Practices (pp. 13-27). London: Kogan Page.
35. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. O'Connor, D. L., & Johnson, T. E. (2004). Measuring team cognition: Concept mapping elicitation as a means of constructing team shared mental models in an applied setting. First International Conference on Concept Mapping, September 14-17, 2004, Pamplona, Spain.
38. Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2006). Expertise und Modellbildung: MITOCAR. Freiburg, Germany: Universitäts-Dissertation.
39. Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2007). Model Inspection Trace of Concepts and Relations. A Heuristic Approach to Language-Oriented Model Assessment. Paper presented at the AERA 2007, Division C, TICL SIG, April 2007, Chicago.
40. Pirnay-Dummer, P. & Nußbickel, M. (in press). New Ways of Finding Out What is Needed to Know. Using the latest Tools for Knowledge and Mental Model Assessment in the Processes of Needs Assessment.
41. Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129-143.
42. Rowe, A. L., & Cooke, N. J. (1995). Measuring mental models: Choosing the right tools for the job. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(3), 243-255. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920060303
43. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The anatomy of team training. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training & retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 312-335). New York: Macmillan Reference.
44. Salas, E., & Fiore, S. M. (2004). Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Savenye, W., Robinson, R., Niemczyk, M., & Atkinson, R. (2008). Assessment of individual learning processes. In M. D. Merrill, van Merriënboer, J., Spector, J. M., & Driscoll, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3 Ed., pp. 776-783). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Schvaneveldt, R. W. (Ed.). (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47. Seel, N. M. (1991). Weltwissen und mentale Modelle[World knowledge and mental models]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
48. Seel, N. M. (1999). Educational diagnosis of mental models: Assessment problems and technologybased solutions. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(2), 153-185.
49. Seel, N. M., Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2006). Mental Models and Problem Solving: Technological Solutions for Measurement and Assessment. In J. Strobel & D. Jonassen (Eds.) Learning by Modelling Systems. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Simon, H. A. (1996). Observations on the sciences of science learning. Pittsburgh, PA: Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.
51. Spector, J. M., Dennen, V. P., & Koszalka, T. A. (2005). Causal maps, mental models and assessing acquisition of expertise. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3.
52. Spector, J. M., & Koszalka, T. A. (2004). The DEEP methodology for assessing learning in complex domains (Final report to the National Science Foundation Evaluative Research and Evaluation Capacity Building). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
53. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61-67. doi:10.1518/001872099779577273
55. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327-352. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327